Steve Litt:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 11:40:07 +0200
> fungal-net wrote:
>
>> Steve Litt:
>>> On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:34:05 +0200
>>> fungal-net wrote:
>>>
Void is also
very close, I for one use it with s6 and 66 for a while now and in
many ways being more carefree than obarun
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 11:42:57 -0500
Steve Litt wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 11:40:07 +0200
> fungal-net wrote:
>
> > Steve Litt:
> > > On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:34:05 +0200
> > > fungal-net wrote:
> > >
> > >> Void is also
> > >> very close, I for one use it with s6 and 66 for a while now and in
Στις Κυρ, Φεβ 2, 2020 at 09:07, ο/η Steve Litt
έγραψε:
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:34:05 +0200
fungal-net mailto:fungal...@obarun.org>> wrote:
Void is also
very close, I for one use it with s6 and 66 for a while now and in
many ways being more carefree than obarun having fast balls thrown
by
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 11:40:07 +0200
fungal-net wrote:
> Steve Litt:
> > On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:34:05 +0200
> > fungal-net wrote:
> >
> >> Void is also
> >> very close, I for one use it with s6 and 66 for a while now and in
> >> many ways being more carefree than obarun having fast balls thrown
Laurent Bercot:
>> I'd like to know what is your view and feeling of this expanding base,
>> what does it mean to you, and whether you see an influence of the
>> project by the growing popularity. If I can interpret this announcement
>> correctly you seem already to be reacting to the Debian s6
Steve Litt:
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:34:05 +0200
> fungal-net wrote:
>
>> Void is also
>> very close, I for one use it with s6 and 66 for a while now and in
>> many ways being more carefree than obarun having fast balls thrown by
>> arch daily.
>
> Have you, or are you going to, write
On Sun, 02 Feb 2020 15:58:12 +
"Laurent Bercot" wrote:
> >Do you mean they don't like editing files and creating symlinks? Do
> >they want a GUI interface to the service directory tree and the symlink
> >tree?
>
> No, it's about service startup with s6-rc. They don't want to dive into
> the
Do you mean they don't like editing files and creating symlinks? Do
they want a GUI interface to the service directory tree and the symlink
tree?
No, it's about service startup with s6-rc. They don't want to dive into
the unpalatable blobs that are the set of systemd unit files or the set
of
On Sun, 02 Feb 2020 14:22:31 +
"Laurent Bercot" wrote:
> The big pain point for further s6 integration in distros, as _every
> single one_ of those I contacted told me, is the user interface,
Do you mean they don't like editing files and creating symlinks? Do
they want a GUI interface to
I'd like to know what is your view and feeling of this expanding base,
what does it mean to you, and whether you see an influence of the
project by the growing popularity. If I can interpret this announcement
correctly you seem already to be reacting to the Debian s6 incorporation
fiasco more
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:34:05 +0200
fungal-net wrote:
> Void is also
> very close, I for one use it with s6 and 66 for a while now and in
> many ways being more carefree than obarun having fast balls thrown by
> arch daily.
Have you, or are you going to, write documentation on how to install
and
Is it 10 years now that s6 has been around, more or less. For 10 year
old software of its nature it appears as the best kept secret. There
are 3 distributions openly available to various levels of users'
expertise, that are now utilizing s6 init and supervision, Obarun for 4
years, Adelie for
12 matches
Mail list logo
