Re: [Supervisor-users] lost supervisor.sock

2014-05-09 Thread Paul Fox
sergey wrote: See if any of your periodic clean-up jobs could wipe out the entry from /tmp. If a directory entry was created and opened by a process, then the removal of the entry from the directory does not affect the process that holds the socket open. But any new attempt to find or open

Re: [Supervisor-users] Harvesting stale application processes

2014-05-09 Thread Sergey Maslyakov
On a related note, documentation says that supervisord relies on SIGCHLD to be notified of a monitored process termination: http://supervisord.org/subprocess.html However, in the code I see that SIGCHLD is swallowed with a mere log message, while the actual mechanism seems to rely on a file