[Supervisor-users] Harvesting stale application processes

2014-05-08 Thread Sergey Maslyakov
Hello, I have an error-handling question about supervisord. In case if supervisord crashes or exits abnormally, and then it is restarted, would the new instance of supervisord be able to harvest the process list and to continue monitoring processes started by its predecessor? Or would it try to

[Supervisor-users] lost supervisor.sock

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Fox
i'm running a relatively old version of supervisor, so if this has been fixed in a later release, i'll live with it -- upgrading this particular system is difficult at the moment. i have a supervisord process that's been running for over 32 days, since april 6th. it's still running, and will

Re: [Supervisor-users] lost supervisor.sock

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Fox
matt wrote: I’d suggest checking your /etc/supervisord.conf to be sure that the following two config entries match up: [unix_http_server] file=/tmp/supervisord.sock ; (the path to the socket file) [supervisorctl] serverurl=unix:///tmp/supervisord.sock they match.

Re: [Supervisor-users] lost supervisor.sock

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Fox
matt's mail made me start thinking about pathnames, so i did some more groveling. it seems that netstat thinks the socket is being listened on: # netstat -an | grep supervisor unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 8404 /var/tmp/supervisor.sock.567 and it seems that