I am behind NAT, but was able to forward the port, and now have 650
meg in
Before anyone comments further on this, I am behind NAT without port
forwarding options for right now. Lets not even go down this road...
Anyways, back to our regularly scheduled Freenet comments
-Galen
Nope, 5076 is still the latest.
/N
- Original Message -
From: "howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Freenet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 5:30 PM
Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 5079?
> I saw in my web interface that Freenet 5079 was the lastest, but when I
> downlo
On Friday 23 April 2004 00:45, Galen wrote:
> Hi Freenet People,
>
> I'd like to hear about your experience with and uses for freenet. I'm
> interested in those that use freenet. How "usable" is it? What is your
> setup? What kind of performance do you get? What kinds of content do
> you get on it?
Hi Freenet People,
I'd like to hear about your experience with and uses for freenet. I'm
interested in those that use freenet. How "usable" is it? What is your
setup? What kind of performance do you get? What kinds of content do
you get on it? How often do you use it?
I ask this as one hopeles
> You are more likly to get useful advise if you post
> another message saying what freenet version you are
> running, if your node can receive incoming
> connections, how many connections your nodes has open,
> have you configured the bandwidth limit to match your
> connection (defaults will flood
On windows XP I've tryed to installfreenet-java-webinstall.exe and freenet-webinstall.exe but the
message that appears is always the same:
" I could not find a compatible Java Runtime Enironment installed
on this machine.Either download and run 'freenet-java-webinstall.exe' instead, or
downloa
I saw in my web interface that Freenet 5079 was the lastest, but when I
downloaded from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar, I
appear to have gotten Freenet 5076 again.
I'm not going crazy I'm I?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC