Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-21 Thread Zenon Panoussis
David Masover wrote: Of course, if you don't own your own computer, how can you trust it? One-way trust. Suppose my bro trusts me, but I don't trust him, I have root, and he wants Freenet. You don't need root to run it and it's probably a good idea to not run it as root even when you are

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-21 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:48:29PM -0500, David Masover wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:33:30AM -0500, David Masover wrote: | |Unfortunately, I can't work on this at all right now. My freenet node |looks fine, only I get a

Re: [freenet-support] Routing problem?/Connectivity not working

2004-07-21 Thread Toad
Probably you just need to continue waiting. A few things to check though: 1. What did you change max connections to? 2. Are you firewalled or behind any sort of NAT? The Transports box on http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/internal/env would be interesting to see (it will give me your IP

Re: [freenet-support] Routing problem?/Connectivity not working

2004-07-21 Thread harmon
Probably you just need to continue waiting. A few things to check though: 1. What did you change max connections to? 2. Are you firewalled or behind any sort of NAT? The Transports box on http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/internal/env would be interesting to see (it will give me your IP

[freenet-support] Key harvester

2004-07-21 Thread Zenon Panoussis
Alright, here's an o p e n f r e e n e t p r o x y (anti- Google syntax): https://8 1 . 1 6 9 . 1 5 9 . 1 4 8 :8080/ I'd appreciate feedback from anyone who cares to play with it and/or attempt to break it. I am particularly interested in unlinked/undocumented FProxy functions which I should

Re: [freenet-support] Key harvester

2004-07-21 Thread harmon
Alright, here's an o p e n f r e e n e t p r o x y (anti- Google syntax): https://8 1 . 1 6 9 . 1 5 9 . 1 4 8 :8080/ I'd appreciate feedback from anyone who cares to play with it and/or attempt to break it. I am particularly interested in unlinked/undocumented FProxy functions which I

[freenet-support] Re: A severe freenet exploit?? - or just FUD?

2004-07-21 Thread Newsbyte
IMHO we need to make freenet work before we make it workfast. And the timescale on making it work may be a timescale of years. Ah, toad...you eternal optimist, you! ;-) Lets say decennia, to be on the safe side!! ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] Key harvester

2004-07-21 Thread Zenon Panoussis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It could be that I have yet to even browse my own proxy successfully. but I tried your site, and received a good 'ol -- Bad Gateway The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. I restarted it two minutes ago, you must have hit it right then. Try

Re: [freenet-support] Key harvester

2004-07-21 Thread Toad
Seems a bit flaky. Every so often I get an Apache error. For example: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /[EMAIL PROTECTED],aAEwN5~NVmuIvZdfqlORxg/BSIT/20// on this server. The blocks appear to prevent access to anything sensitive. I think you probably want to set publicNode=true

Re: [freenet-support] Key harvester

2004-07-21 Thread Zenon Panoussis
Toad wrote: Seems a bit flaky. Every so often I get an Apache error. Forbidden You don't have permission to access /[EMAIL PROTECTED],aAEwN5~NVmuIvZdfqlORxg/BSIT/20// on this server. Ugh. Sometimes logging serves better purposes than policing. I can't see what went wrong there. I do have some

Re: [freenet-support] Key harvester

2004-07-21 Thread Zenon Panoussis
I wrote: I do have some mod_rewrite rules in the proxy configuration in order to protect status info etc, but this shouldn't have been caught by them, unless the original URI contained a query string, i.e. server:port/something?someother . That was it; there was a query string date=some_date.

Re: [freenet-support] Key harvester

2004-07-21 Thread Zenon Panoussis
Toad wrote: Is there a list somewhere of the query strings used? For fproxy: ?key=key ?htl=number ?linkhtl=number ?mime=mime type ?date=date ?rdate=true|false ?force=short hex cookie Probably there are more for the splitfile servlet. I was trying to block access to ?setSimpleAdvancedMode=mode,

Re: [freenet-support] Key harvester

2004-07-21 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:26:04PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote: Toad wrote: Is there a list somewhere of the query strings used? For fproxy: ?key=key ?htl=number ?linkhtl=number ?mime=mime type ?date=date ?rdate=true|false ?force=short hex cookie Probably there are more for

[freenet-support] Connection/Routing problems?

2004-07-21 Thread harmon
Another 12 hours or so, and still no dice. I get messages like this in my log file periodically, i'm set to log the normal mishaps, I tried minor, and was greeted with way too much to look through real quick like. Jul 21, 2004 5:59:32 AM (freenet.support.io.NIOInputStream, YThread-19, NORMAL):

Re: [freenet-support] Connection/Routing problems?

2004-07-21 Thread Zenon Panoussis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ***A couple problems so far.. All 4 sessions, It doesn't even appear to be able to access the default ... never-fail site.. however there is a ton of traffic, so i KNOW its finding nodes out there. I suspect something with your firewall. What does it block? Can you make it

[freenet-support] In need of opinions and ideas

2004-07-21 Thread Zenon Panoussis
The whole load/logging/key harvesting discussion I started here a couple of days ago originated from my wish to make freenet searchable, especially to the non-freenet world. So I installed an open p r o x y in order to harvest keys, so that I could set up a search engine. What I only realised

[freenet-support] proxy search

2004-07-21 Thread miguel
Zenon, doing proxy stuff to let outsiders into freenet is inviting in the wolves. Why do that? And you'll be the first to get maimed and eaten before the rest of ALL the other Freenetters. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-21 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zenon Panoussis wrote: | | | David Masover wrote: | | Of course, if you don't own | your own computer, how can you trust it? One-way trust. Suppose my bro | trusts me, but I don't trust him, I have root, and he wants Freenet. | | | You don't need

Re: [freenet-support] In need of opinions and ideas

2004-07-21 Thread S
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 02:06:51 +0200 Zenon Panoussis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would really appreciate your thoughts on these issues, especially pointers to aspects I've missed. I don't really agree with the idea that such a pr0xy would bring exposure or users to Freenet. Joe Surfer, upon

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-21 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | java -cp freenet.jar freenet.Version on a command line? Freenet: Fred 0.5 (protocol STABLE-1.50) build 5084 (last good build: 5083) | Show me it. Same as what you've been seeing in the logs, pretty much. Since it dies now same as ever.

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-21 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 TLD wrote: | what's your mainport.allowedHosts= setting, and what's the IP of the | computer you're trying to access from? It's sane. Or you tell me: http://slaphack.com/freenet.conf http://slaphack.com/freenet.log -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [freenet-support] In need of opinions and ideas

2004-07-21 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 S ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) makes some valid points. I didn't feel like quoting the whole thing, but... They are all moot if there's a big banner inserted onto every page which points to an explanation of freenet (as well as a disclaimer somewhere), and