[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
Hrm.. sorry.. it seems to be working now that I'm using r23350. I was having all my problems with r23352--which I could have sworn was referenced in freenet-stable-latest.jar.url this morning :|. Anywho, sorry for the noise.

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:13:11 -0500, > Dennis Nezic wrote: > > I should also add that my load averages (uptime) were at 80. I've > never seen them that high before. Update: I tried it again, except this time I accidentally forgot to give it a seednodes.fref. The first attempt, the same thing

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:42:35 -0500, > Dennis Nezic wrote: > > ., constantly using 100% cpu since being launched. I should also add that my load averages (uptime) were at 80. I've never seen them that high before.

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:02:40 +, > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Freenet 0.7 build 1169 is now available. Please update. No massive > changes, but some important bugfixes which hopefully will fix some of > the connectivity problems that have been reported recently: I'm having a LOT of trouble

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081106/e087cc8c/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Node won't connect to peers 1167/68

2008-11-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
uest at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081106/4fcfbf4a/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081106/fb1a8325/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7 build 1169 is now available. Please update. No massive changes, but some important bugfixes which hopefully will fix some of the connectivity problems that have been reported recently: - Fix announcing to the same node more than once, disconnecting, wasting lots of announcements.

Re: [freenet-support] Node won't connect to peers 1167/68

2008-11-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
Okay, the PacketSender resent-and-not-acked problem is probably caused by a bug fixed in 1169. Unfortunately we will have to wait for most of the network to update before this will make a big impact. On Thursday 06 November 2008 02:43, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:00:52 +,

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
Please forward the below to FMS. Also, if update doesn't work, please run update.sh / update.cmd manually. Thanks. On Thursday 06 November 2008 14:02, Matthew Toseland wrote: Freenet 0.7 build 1169 is now available. Please update. No massive changes, but some important bugfixes which

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:02:40 +, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freenet 0.7 build 1169 is now available. Please update. No massive changes, but some important bugfixes which hopefully will fix some of the connectivity problems that have been reported recently: I'm having a LOT

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:42:35 -0500, Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ., constantly using 100% cpu since being launched. I should also add that my load averages (uptime) were at 80. I've never seen them that high before. ___ Support mailing

[freenet-support] Node can't find native BigInteger library

2008-11-06 Thread Victor Denisov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just noticed that, for some reason, my node doesn't pick up native BigInteger library: ... Initializing Node using Freenet Build #1169 r23350M and freenet-ext Build #24 r23199 with Sun Microsystems Inc. JVM version 1.6.0_06 running on amd64 Windows

Re: [freenet-support] Node can't find native BigInteger library

2008-11-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 07 November 2008 00:03, Victor Denisov wrote: Just noticed that, for some reason, my node doesn't pick up native BigInteger library: ... Initializing Node using Freenet Build #1169 r23350M and freenet-ext Build #24 r23199 with Sun Microsystems Inc. JVM version 1.6.0_06 running

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:13:11 -0500, Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I should also add that my load averages (uptime) were at 80. I've never seen them that high before. Update: I tried it again, except this time I accidentally forgot to give it a seednodes.fref. The first attempt, the

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:28:38 -0500, Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .. BUT it was still consuming all the cpu!--supposedly not doing anything!? At this point I turned the logger back on, and to my horror, it immediately filled to over 70MB, 69.9 of which were errors of the

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
Hrm.. sorry.. it seems to be working now that I'm using r23350. I was having all my problems with r23352--which I could have sworn was referenced in freenet-stable-latest.jar.url this morning :|. Anywho, sorry for the noise. ___ Support mailing list