[freenet-support] Fwd: memory problem

-- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original message - From: Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: devl freenet devl@freenetproject.org Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 02:05:25 -0700 Subject: memory problem Where do I need to define memory constraints for the java executables as defined

[freenet-support] capacity

but in 5102 they only way to achieve that is by restarting with 10 or 20 connections max. If I were able to claim back some capacity without having to restart the node I would let it run 24 hours a day. I hope to see something like this in a future version. Thanks -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [freenet-support] MIRC?

, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:05:40PM -0700, Maps Baps wrote: I take no offense in what you call pedantic but has it ever occurred to you that it is NAT that labels a session as MIRC when port 6667 is being used? I overlooked that and so I asked about it. Luckily someone knowledgeable answered my

[freenet-support] (void) i/o ratio

to define a ratio between the number of inbound and outbound connections so that it is like 50/50 or 30/70 for example? Thank you all -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org

[freenet-support] inbound/outbound ratio

or outbound? Maybe it's a stupid question but I am wondering about this. Regards -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http

[freenet-support] (void)???

Looking at the list of inbound connected peers I see some named '(void)'. It seems nodes can connect in that way. Is there a way to know the ip of these '(void)'s or a way to not accept them? I am getting a little paranoid here, not really, but still I wonder. -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED

[freenet-support] MIRC?

with type MIRC. Can anyone tell me what is happening here? -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi

Fwd: [freenet-support] MIRC?

elsewhere since I block this ip as well) Sofar these two IP are the only ones that showed up in NAT as being involved in a MIRC session. Since what happens differs from all the other nodes I block these two ip's but I would like to know what's happening. Thanks -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [freenet-support] MIRC?

, 2005 at 01:50:32PM -0700, Maps Baps wrote: Is there any MIRC involved in freenet? I noticed the presence of MIRC like sessions sometime ago, just yet I looked again and found two machines that deviate from the normal freenet pattern. They both start normally as inbound connections but soon

Re: [freenet-support] MIRC?

, 26 Apr 2005 09:27:32 +1200, Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On 26/04/05, Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any MIRC involved in freenet? I noticed the presence of MIRC like sessions sometime ago, just yet I looked again and found two machines that deviate from the normal

Fwd: Re: [freenet-support] Fwd: superfluous SYN after exit node

have changed its address. On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 11:01:55AM -0700, Maps Baps wrote: L.S., Some more on this, the nodes keep trying to connect the whole other 12 hours long. Shouldn't they give up after some unsuccesfull attempts until they are notified the node is on again? Maybe I am just

Fwd: Re: [freenet-support] Fwd: superfluous SYN after exit node

, what makes other nodes stop sending SYN to node X? T.I.A. -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original message - From: Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@freenetproject.org Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:14:05 +0100 Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Fwd: superfluous SYN after exit node

[freenet-support] superfluous SYN after exit node

. Their SYN packets are at least wasting some capacity without reason I think. -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http

[freenet-support] Fwd: superfluous SYN after exit node

someone confirm the behaviour I see is correct and inline with the intended behaviour? T.I.A. -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original message - From: Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@freenetproject.org Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:35:43 -0700 Subject: superfluous SYN after exit

Re: [freenet-support] listenPort?

mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing

Fwd: Re: [freenet-support] listenPort?

of something wrong. -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original message - From: Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@freenetproject.org Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 04:53:41 -0700 Subject: Re: [freenet-support] listenPort? Sorry for the trouble, it was my mistake and only firewall/nat related

[freenet-support] listenPort?

. What are these other packets? They address another port. Also, could it be that I should wait some days for connection attempts addressing the proper port? T.I.A. -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http

[freenet-support] tcp only?

L.S., Is it sufficient to allow incoming tcp on the port mentioned in the config file for a node to become fully operational? T.I.A. -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org

[freenet-support] error, fyi

) java.lang.IllegalStateException: unclosed -- Maps Baps [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto