e: 9/6/2006 10:53:33 AM
> > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, "freenetwork at web.de" wrote:
> > >Don't feed the troll
> > >
> >
> > I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 21:07, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> What is "top-post?"
Exactly that... read the netiquette
MK
Sturm wrote:
> >What is "top-post?"
> >
> >
> >> [Original Message]
> >> From: Fake Name
> >> To:
> >> Cc:
> >> Date: 9/6/2006 10:53:33 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*
> >>
>
seland
> To:
> Date: 9/6/2006 5:49:02 PM
> Subject: Top-posting was Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*
>
> Top-posting has its uses. I sometimes top-post and sometimes reply
> inline.
>
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:41:06PM +0200, Ortwin Regel wrote:
> > H
It will but it will take time. You have to remember that 0.5 never did
(afaik).
On 3 Sep 2006 01:22:23 -, Fake Name
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, "freenetwork at web.de" wrote:
> >Don't feed the troll
> >
>
> I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to Beta state
> with
>> Don't feed the troll
>>
>
> I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to Beta state
> with open-net
>
> p.s. please don't top-post
Imho with the limited resources it is especially important to prioritise. There
already
exists opennet, it is called 0,5. However, the darknet
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:22:23AM -, Fake Name wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, "freenetwork at web.de" wrote:
> >Don't feed the troll
>
> I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to Beta state
> with open-net
There are many other requirements for beta. For example, we need
On 9/6/06, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> What is "top-post?"
See my .sig block. Also, note how I responded to your message.
On the other hand, do we care? Are we caring about this?
--Joel
--
It reverses the normal flow of conversation.
> What's wrong with top-posting?
> > Top-posting.
> > >
What is "top-post?"
> [Original Message]
> From: Fake Name
> To:
> Cc:
> Date: 9/6/2006 10:53:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*
>
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, "freenetwork at web.de" wrote:
> >Don't feed the troll
> >
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't feed the troll
I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to Beta state
with open-net
p.s. please don't top-post
Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
failures-in-waiting until
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:22:23AM -, Fake Name wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't feed the troll
I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to Beta state
with open-net
There are many other requirements for beta. For example, we
It will but it will take time. You have to remember that 0.5 never did (afaik).On 3 Sep 2006 01:22:23 -, Fake Name
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Tue, 29 Aug 2006,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Don't feed the trollI am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state.It needs to move to Beta state
Don't feed the troll
I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to Beta state
with open-net
p.s. please don't top-post
Imho with the limited resources it is especially important to prioritise. There already
exists opennet, it is called 0,5. However, the darknet is
What is top-post?
[Original Message]
From: Fake Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@freenetproject.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9/6/2006 10:53:33 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't feed the troll
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 21:07, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
What is top-post?
Exactly that... read the netiquette
MK
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at
On 9/6/06, Nicholas Sturm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is top-post?
See my .sig block. Also, note how I responded to your message.
On the other hand, do we care? Are we caring about this?
--Joel
--
It reverses the normal flow of conversation.
What's wrong with top-posting?
Top-posting.
PROTECTED]
Date: 9/6/2006 10:53:33 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't feed the troll
I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to Beta state
with open-net
p.s. please don't top-post
PROTECTED] wrote:
What is top-post?
[Original Message]
From: Fake Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@freenetproject.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9/6/2006 10:53:33 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
@freenetproject.org
Date: 9/6/2006 5:49:02 PM
Subject: Top-posting was Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*
Top-posting has its uses. I sometimes top-post and sometimes reply
inline.
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:41:06PM +0200, Ortwin Regel wrote:
He has a problem with you writing above the email
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, "freenetwork at web.de" wrote:
>Don't feed the troll
>
I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to Beta state
with open-net
p.s. please don't top-post
>
>>Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
>>failures-in-waiting until it
Don't feed the troll
>Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
>failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha
>with open-net.
>
>
>___
>Support mailing list
>Support at freenetproject.org
Don't feed the troll
Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha
with open-net.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
