> Maybe PuTTY (free, IIRC) has port worwarding too, but can't remember well.
>
>
Indeed PuTTY does do forwarding now.
--
"Sometimes things aren't exactly black and white when it comes to accounting
procedures."
- George W. Bush
___
support mailing l
Roger Hayter wrote:
A solution suggested on this list was to run a proxy programme (?Squid)
on the Freenet server, and, presumably, proxy to a different port
for the other machines to contact. Sounds as if it might work, but my
server has other little jobs and can't spare resources for ano
er has other little jobs and can't spare resources for another
unnecessary daemon. Would be interested to know if it works though?
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Hayter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:24 AM
Sub
Robert Carroll wrote:
no matter what. If people need to control access this can be done with a
firewall. ssh tunneling is no solution for windows users, unless someone
out there knows how this could be done in windows.
For windows clients solutions exists:
Cygwin's openssh works just great f
-
From: "Roger Hayter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:24 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Tired of my complaining yet? If not, read!
In message <002201c28492$b6cd6180$4e0d4818@ip78>, Robert Carroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In message <002201c28492$b6cd6180$4e0d4818@ip78>, Robert Carroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
I just want to spout off about my node's performance, or lack of it.
I'm running a permanent node on a server that has other things to do
besides spend every cpu cycle on a java app. Also, like alot of no
I just want to spout off about my node's
performance, or lack of it. I'm running a permanent node on a server that
has other things to do besides spend every cpu cycle on a java app. Also,
like alot of node operators, I don't use the machine directly, but instead
access fproxy and fcp from
