On Friday 27 February 2009 21:17:21 bqz69 wrote:
> Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> >> It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
> >
> > More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do "emerge freenet", and
>
> My main complain
On Friday 27 February 2009 21:17:21 bqz69 wrote:
Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do emerge freenet, and
My main complain is, that is not
Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
>> It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
>
> More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do "emerge freenet", and
My main complain is, that is not possible to use Freenet anonymously for
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:17:21 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> The Freenet program might be something like one combined GUI (Graphic
> User Interface) where everything could be done, in order to use
> Freenet at its maximum capabilities - that's my dream.
What you are dreaming of is an entire
bqz69 wrote:
> I was just wondering?
>
> I have tried out freenet for years, but it still seems not to be ready
> for serious use by individual people, that is the huge group of ordinary
> people out there on the Internet, who are in serious need for a Freenet.
>
> It can be used mostly only
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do "emerge freenet", and
*done*. I have a running node ready to surf--err, maybe a quick wizard
first :P. In Window$, I assume, you
I was just wondering?
I have tried out freenet for years, but it still seems not to be ready
for serious use by individual people, that is the huge group of ordinary
people out there on the Internet, who are in serious need for a Freenet.
It can be used mostly only by small groups of smart
bqz69 wrote:
I was just wondering?
I have tried out freenet for years, but it still seems not to be ready
for serious use by individual people, that is the huge group of ordinary
people out there on the Internet, who are in serious need for a Freenet.
It can be used mostly only by small
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do emerge freenet, and
*done*. I have a running node ready to surf--err, maybe a quick wizard
first :P. In Window$, I assume, you
Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do emerge freenet, and
My main complain is, that is not possible to use Freenet anonymously for
individual
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:17:21 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
The Freenet program might be something like one combined GUI (Graphic
User Interface) where everything could be done, in order to use
Freenet at its maximum capabilities - that's my dream.
What you are dreaming of is an entire
bqz69 wrote:
> I was just wondering?
> I do not have any capabilities of programming myself, and is only a
> possibly enduser of Freenet.
I think that about sums it up right there. Most people involved in the
project are end-users, and there seems to be only one paid and two or
three volunteer
bqz69 wrote:
I was just wondering?
snip
I do not have any capabilities of programming myself, and is only a
possibly enduser of Freenet.
I think that about sums it up right there. Most people involved in the
project are end-users, and there seems to be only one paid and two or
three volunteer
13 matches
Mail list logo
