RE: [freenet-support] Build 659 (unstable)

2003-02-12 Thread Niklas Bergh
JVM 1.4.1_01 (always and ever until there is a newer one) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland Sent: den 6 februari 2003 19:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Build 659 (unstable) Are you sure you aren't

RE: [freenet-support] Build 659 (unstable)

2003-02-10 Thread Niklas Bergh
659 seems to have solved the 'Node suddenly ceases traffic'-problem. I have a node that has been up for close 120 hours now and there is till no sign of stagnation. It is serving up 13000 q/h at about 1MBit/s. One thing though: Peer addr Send Count Send Size Receiving Messages Idle time Lifetime

RE: [freenet-support] Build 659 (unstable)

2003-02-06 Thread Niklas Bergh
659 would seem to have some problems with announcing. One of the nodes I upgraded yesterday hasn't done a single usefult thing since... Feb 4, 2003 5:39:20 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint Feb 4, 2003 5:39:21

Re: [freenet-support] Build 659 (unstable)

2003-02-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
Are you sure you aren't using a nonstandard JVM? The IBM JVM has been known to have serious problems, as has Kaffe, and old versions of the Sun one sometimes have nasty bugs.. On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:26:25AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote: 659 would seem to have some problems with announcing. One