On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 11:05:14PM -0700, Galen wrote:
Hi,
One of the places where I would like to use freenet is behind NAT. I
know all about port mapping, but this simply isn't available in this
situation.
What is the hope of running Freenet?
I know virtually every other protocol
One of the places where I would like to use freenet is behind NAT. I
know all about port mapping, but this simply isn't available in this
situation.
What is the hope of running Freenet?
I know virtually every other protocol has implemented support for NAT
as part of (or before) becoming
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:41:56 -0700, Galen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella,
fasttrack, etc. Uploading doesn't always work really great, but
downloading is quite decent. Bittorrent seems to have zero problems
saturating upstream
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:07:15PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:41:56 -0700, Galen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella,
fasttrack, etc. Uploading doesn't always work really great, but
downloading is quite
No, they haven't. Please try running a web server behind a NAT that
you
can't forward ports on. Or ssh. Or any number of other client/server
protocols.
I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella,
fasttrack, etc. Uploading doesn't always work really great, but
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:07:49PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
No, they haven't. Please try running a web server behind a NAT that
you
can't forward ports on. Or ssh. Or any number of other client/server
protocols.
I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella,
- Original Message -
From: Galen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 8:05 AM
Subject: [freenet-support] NAT Freenet
Hi,
One of the places where I would like to use freenet is behind NAT. I
know all about port mapping, but this simply isn't
