[freenet-support] Re: Freenet uses java and I'm a loon.
I am surprised and delighted to report that after upgrading to the current freenet update my performance problems have disappeared completely. I am now able to work with the default thread and server connection settings. Apparently earlier versions to the just released version weren't working right! Tim McGrath ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Flaþ!..Flaþ!..Flaþ!.. Dünyanýn Ýlk Astroloji ve Gizli Ýlimler Portalý Açýldý...
Dünya'nn lk Astroloji ve Gizli limler Portalwww.astromerkez.com Dünya'nn ilk astroloji portal hizmete girdi. Haftalk maç yorumlar, Bu Haftaki Fener-Galata Derbisinin sonucu Gündemdeki konular, Deprem, Saddam ve Sava, Seçimler, AB ve Türkiye'nin gelecei , R.Tayyip Erdoan'n ve Deniz Baykal' n astroloji haritalar ve karakter analizleri, kiiye özel ücretsiz detayl günlük fal hizmeti, Tüm burçlarn hiçbir yerde bulamayacanz detayl analizleri, Tüm gizemli limler, Vefk, Remil, Ebced, Havvas,Ledün... ifal dualar, Duann tesirinin bilimsel açklamas ve yaplan aratrma ve deneyler, Manyetizma, Durugörü, Astral Seyahat, Meditasyon, Ruhu Bedenden Ayrma.. Ve Daha Pek Çok Konu Tüm Dünya'da ilk defa ve sadece www.astromerkez.com da ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Freenet bug?
While the current release (531) works great here cpuwise, I just noticed something extremely odd here in http://localhost:/servlet/nodeinfo/performance/general : # Active pooled jobs: 136 (113.36%) [Rejecting incoming connections and requests!] # Available threads: 54 Now, I understand that it's rejecting requests to do other work, right? ... ... It's not actually serving any data at all, although it has quite a few connections in iptraf. I've been monitoring it for around six minutes and the load isn't going down very quickly, I only saw one job drop off the queue. Very little data is being sent or recieved, and the cpu use of the daemon is practically negligible. (load average is 0.00 actually. Oy.) Also as I watch it now, the daemon is only connected to 5 servers. It's hard to watch it through iptraf, but it doesn't look to me like any of the servers are sending or recieving any data at all. The server isn't even responding to local requests for information. Something seems very wrong. Errors I've recieved recently (The last 24 hrs) in the logs: Nov 6, 2002 1:57:49 AM (freenet.node.ds.FSDataStoreElement$KeyInputStreamImpl, Finalizer): Please close() me manually in finalizer: Key: 683f38303336237daf9543e23b285c04e703751b100302 Buffer: freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$ExternalNativeBuffer@7b4703 New: true ( 0 of 65600 read) java.lang.IllegalStateException: unclosed at freenet.node.ds.FSDataStoreElement$KeyInputStreamImpl.finalize(FSDataStoreElement.java:312) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.invokeFinalizeMethod(Native Method) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.runFinalizer(Finalizer.java:83) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.access$100(Finalizer.java:14) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:160) === StateChain started at Wed Nov 06 01:48:20 EST 2002 Current state: Request Done @ f95052bb7196f417 === Nov 6, 2002 4:53:24 AM (freenet.node.states.request.TransferReply, QThread-1538): Upstream node sent bad data! Nov 6, 2002 4:53:24 AM (freenet.node.states.request.TransferReply, QThread-1537): Failed to send data with CB 0x81 (CB_BAD_DATA), on chain 9a94e18541637251 If you need any other information, please let me know. ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] getting bigger - time to raise defaults
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:03:27PM -0500, Zlatin Balevsky wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | high if it's a big freesite. The correct response is to implement | mixmastered first two hops, which we will not implement before 1.0. This is all nice and good, but please consider raising the defaults even if by just a little _now_. It will help the end-user experience greatly. Um, this is a completely separate question. Scalability, which has very little to do with anonymity. Thanks in advance. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ msg02021/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[freenet-support] Re: Freenet bug?
Hmm. I've noticed something recently. I have had the two same connections 'open' according to http://localhost:/servlet/nodeinfo/networking/ocm for a insanely long amount of time. Iptraf reports no connections are currently running, certaintly not by those ip addresses. Peer addrOpenSend CountReceivingLifetimeMessages ThreadTypeID tcp/194.153.168.129:52196 yes 0 yes 34422575 1 QThread-1783 Inbound 1a00355 tcp/213.153.48.24:2561 yes 0 no 13584673 3 QThread-1817 Inbound 3af8a6 My daemon is still using no cpu and is still according to it overloaded severely. Diagnostics reports really weird values in some bits: insufficient threads says there have never been an occurence of no thread being available for a task. http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/diagnostics/jobsPerQThread/hour also shows the 'qthreads' stopped doing tasks at around 7am, and all entries afterwards are NaN hour1036573200 11.555084745762711 14.051661415214742 1.0 46.0472 hour1036576800 15.421875 16.5401368186334NaN NaN 384 hour1036580400 14.341708542713567 14.385171205150542 NaN NaN 199 hour1036584000 NaN NaN NaN NaN 0 hour1036587600 NaN NaN NaN NaN 0 http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/diagnostics/globalQueryTrafficDeviation/hour shows some interesting information, although I can't understand heads or tails of what it's trying to say. Again, after 7am, interesting information occurs. in this instance however, all entries match eachother exactly! (no std deviation. minimum is exactly the same as maximum... really odd) I'd include examples here but copy and pasting is producing strange results. wait, let me see... I think this will work: hour1036580400 3893.9370370370366 2.9721561091352338 3890.1 3895.85554 6 hour1036584000 3895.85554 0.0 3895.85554 3895.85554 6 hour1036587600 3895.85554 0.0 3895.85554 3895.85554 6 ... That sort of worked. Anyway, I think you can see that all the entries match. In fact, every single one matches after 7am. :/ I can't think of any other data I can include that would help. If you need something let me know, I'm leaving this node running as it's basically not productive, but also not hurting anything by running in this state. In the last four hours, the amount of jobs to do has not gone down by more than one, and in some cases it has increased. :/ I think something is seriously fubared somewhere important in this thing ^^; Tim McGrath ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5.0.6
Freenet 0.5.0.6 is now available. It fixes a major bug that was causing freenet nodes to overload the machines they were running on. The Windows installer is available: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-webinstall.exe?download The linux distribution: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-0.5.0.6.tar.gz?download And the source: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-0.5.0.6.src.tar.gz?download It would be a very good idea to upgrade to this version, otherwise you may have big problems with your node caused by that bug. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ msg02023/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet bug?
I *was* using 501. I think 503 fixed this. I've been running it for a few hours and it's both functioning at low cpu use *and* it's working too. Tim McGrath ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] CPU Eating other things (bugs?)
Matthew Toseland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 06:58:33PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: I tried that (but with a lower magnitude on the maximumThreads), and it seemed to help for a while. But when I got home today, the load average was back in the upper 20s/lower 30s. It works now, with 533? I've been running rel-0-5-1 CVS from 5 hours ago for 5 hours now, and load average is remaining in what I'd consider a healthy range. I won't call it fixed yet, because it hasn't been long enough, but so far so good. -- Greg Wooledge | Truth belongs to everybody. [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | msg02025/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[freenet-support] ****Business Proposal****
NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY NIGERIAN WATER WAYS APAPA, LAGOS.NIGERIA CELL PHONE:234-804-213-8559 REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DEAR FRIEND, YOUR COMPANY'S NAME AND ADDRESS WAS GOTTEN FROM A BUSINESS DIRECTORY IN MY SEARCH FOR A WELL KNOWN BUSINESSMAN WHO HAS NO QUESTIONABLE CHARACTER AND MUST BE A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESSMAN. AS A MATTER OF FACT, I AM JUSTICE MUSA , A DIRECTOR IN THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY (N.E.P.A). ALSO I WAS PRIVILEGED TO BE A MEMBER OF TENDER'S BOARD THAT AWARDED AND SUPERVISED THE EXECUTION OF A MULTIMILLION U.S. DOLLARS CONTRACT IN 1998. THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND COMMISSIONED IN AUGUST 1996,AND ORIGINAL CONTRACT VALUE PAID IN OCTOBER 2000, TO THE FOREIGN FIRM THAT ACTUALLY EXECUTED THE CONTRACT. HOWEVER, AS A RESULT OF OVER-INVOICING AND SERIES OF REVISION CARRIED OUT IN THE COURSE OF THE CONTRACT EXECUTION, THERE NOW EXISTS A FLOATING SUM OF US$45.5M(FORTY FIVE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND U.S DOLLARS ONLY). THIS MONEY IS NOW DUE FOR PAYMENT IN THE GOVERNMENT QUARTERLY PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND WE WISH TO REMIT THIS FUND INTO YOUR DESIGNATED PERSONAL OR CORPORATE ACCOUNTS OVERSEAS. WE SHALL SECURE THE PAYMENT APPROVALS FROM THE RELEVANT OFFICE/MINISTRIES HERE FOR THE RELEASE OF THIS CONTRACT SUM IN FAVOUR OF YOUR COMPANY WITH DOCUMENT AND INFORMATION WE SHALL REQUEST FROM YOU TOO, WE HAVE NOW CONCLUDED ARRANGEMENTS IN THE CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA TO REMIT THIS MONEY AS SUM REALIZED BY A COMPANY THROUGH LEGITIMATE MEANS IN NIGERIA. TERMS AND CONDITIONS THE FUND WILL BE SHARED 35% FOR YOU AND 60% FOR US. THE REMAINING 5% TAKES CARE OF ALL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES. TO FORMALISE THIS TRANSACTION IN NIGERIA IN FAVOUR OF YOUR DESIGNATED COMPANY WE REQUIRE YOUTOFORWARD THE FOLLOWING: 1. AN ASSURANCE OF YOUR ABILITY, WILLINGNESS AND READINESS TO FULLY CORPORATE WITH US DURING DISBURSEMENT OVERSEAS AND TO MAINTAIN THE MAXIMUM CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIRED IN A BUSINESS OF THIS NATURE IN ALL PLACES AT ALL TIMES ON BOTH SIDES. 2. PARTICULARS OF YOUR BANKS INCLUDING NAME OF BANK, ADDRESS, ACCOUNT NUMBERS, TELEX AND FAX NUMBERSANDE-MAIL NUMBER OF YOUR BANK. 3.YOUR PRIVATE TELEX, FAX AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR SAFE, QUICK AND EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION INCLUDING HOME AND MOBILE PHONES (IF ANY). 4.WILLINGNESS READINESS TO ASSIST ME IN PROCURING RELEVANT DOCUMENTS/APPROVALS. THIS REMITTANCE IS GUARANTEE IN LESS THAN 14(FOURTEEN) WORKING DAYS UPON RECEIPT OF THE ABOVE MENTION PARTICULARS BY FAX, HOWEVER, IT REQUIRES THE HIGHEST CO-OPERATION, SERIOUSNESS, MUTUAL TRUST, HONEST AND STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL ON BOTH SIDES TO AVOID JEOPARDIZING THE POSITION OF THE OFFICERS WHO ARE TOP GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONARIES. ALSO WE WANT TO USE PART OF OUR PERCENTAGE TO IMPORT ANY QUICK SELLING GOODS WITH YOUR ASSISTANCE AFTER THE FUND HAS BEENTRANSFERREDINTO YOUR BANK ACCOUNT. LOOKING FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU THROUGH MY TELEPHONE:234-804-213-8559 OR REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BEST REGARD. JUSTICE MUSA ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] ****Business Proposal****
ooh.. wow... a businesesss Venture umm who would this cool venter be for??? me or others in this cool group :P - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:37 PM Subject: [freenet-support] Business Proposal NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY NIGERIAN WATER WAYS APAPA, LAGOS.NIGERIA CELL PHONE:234-804-213-8559 REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DEAR FRIEND, YOUR COMPANY'S NAME AND ADDRESS WAS GOTTEN FROM A BUSINESS DIRECTORY IN MY SEARCH FOR A WELL KNOWN BUSINESSMAN WHO HAS NO QUESTIONABLE CHARACTER AND MUST BE A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESSMAN. AS A MATTER OF FACT, I AM JUSTICE MUSA , A DIRECTOR IN THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY (N.E.P.A). ALSO I WAS PRIVILEGED TO BE A MEMBER OF TENDER'S BOARD THAT AWARDED AND SUPERVISED THE EXECUTION OF A MULTIMILLION U.S. DOLLARS CONTRACT IN 1998. THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND COMMISSIONED IN AUGUST 1996,AND ORIGINAL CONTRACT VALUE PAID IN OCTOBER 2000, TO THE FOREIGN FIRM THAT ACTUALLY EXECUTED THE CONTRACT. HOWEVER, AS A RESULT OF OVER-INVOICING AND SERIES OF REVISION CARRIED OUT IN THE COURSE OF THE CONTRACT EXECUTION, THERE NOW EXISTS A FLOATING SUM OF US$45.5M(FORTY FIVE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND U.S DOLLARS ONLY). THIS MONEY IS NOW DUE FOR PAYMENT IN THE GOVERNMENT QUARTERLY PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND WE WISH TO REMIT THIS FUND INTO YOUR DESIGNATED PERSONAL OR CORPORATE ACCOUNTS OVERSEAS. WE SHALL SECURE THE PAYMENT APPROVALS FROM THE RELEVANT OFFICE/MINISTRIES HERE FOR THE RELEASE OF THIS CONTRACT SUM IN FAVOUR OF YOUR COMPANY WITH DOCUMENT AND INFORMATION WE SHALL REQUEST FROM YOU TOO, WE HAVE NOW CONCLUDED ARRANGEMENTS IN THE CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA TO REMIT THIS MONEY AS SUM REALIZED BY A COMPANY THROUGH LEGITIMATE MEANS IN NIGERIA. TERMS AND CONDITIONS THE FUND WILL BE SHARED 35% FOR YOU AND 60% FOR US. THE REMAINING 5% TAKES CARE OF ALL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES. TO FORMALISE THIS TRANSACTION IN NIGERIA IN FAVOUR OF YOUR DESIGNATED COMPANY WE REQUIRE YOUTOFORWARD THE FOLLOWING: 1. AN ASSURANCE OF YOUR ABILITY, WILLINGNESS AND READINESS TO FULLY CORPORATE WITH US DURING DISBURSEMENT OVERSEAS AND TO MAINTAIN THE MAXIMUM CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIRED IN A BUSINESS OF THIS NATURE IN ALL PLACES AT ALL TIMES ON BOTH SIDES. 2. PARTICULARS OF YOUR BANKS INCLUDING NAME OF BANK, ADDRESS, ACCOUNT NUMBERS, TELEX AND FAX NUMBERSANDE-MAIL NUMBER OF YOUR BANK. 3.YOUR PRIVATE TELEX, FAX AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR SAFE, QUICK AND EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION INCLUDING HOME AND MOBILE PHONES (IF ANY). 4.WILLINGNESS READINESS TO ASSIST ME IN PROCURING RELEVANT DOCUMENTS/APPROVALS. THIS REMITTANCE IS GUARANTEE IN LESS THAN 14(FOURTEEN) WORKING DAYS UPON RECEIPT OF THE ABOVE MENTION PARTICULARS BY FAX, HOWEVER, IT REQUIRES THE HIGHEST CO-OPERATION, SERIOUSNESS, MUTUAL TRUST, HONEST AND STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL ON BOTH SIDES TO AVOID JEOPARDIZING THE POSITION OF THE OFFICERS WHO ARE TOP GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONARIES. ALSO WE WANT TO USE PART OF OUR PERCENTAGE TO IMPORT ANY QUICK SELLING GOODS WITH YOUR ASSISTANCE AFTER THE FUND HAS BEENTRANSFERREDINTO YOUR BANK ACCOUNT. LOOKING FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU THROUGH MY TELEPHONE:234-804-213-8559 OR REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BEST REGARD. JUSTICE MUSA ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] How big is freenet, right now, you think?
No. If other nodes can push references into your routing table, the whole anonymity aspect of freenet goes up in smoke as the CIA/FBI/whoever fixes everyone's routing tables to point to them. So you add the FBI nodes to your current routes and the routes that good nodes are sending you. I don't see how that is different from now. ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Build 530
Hmm. Try 531; if this doesn't work... are you in the default seednodes.ref? No - I started with that, built up a big list of nodes and have now remembered to save it so that when my routing table gets eaten (a distressingly common occurence - roughly every other boot) I can reseed it. My node (build 530) now knows about 95 other nodes (down from the seeded 146) and seems healthy. Although thses errors keep showing up: Nov 6, 2002 6:38:41 PM (freenet.diagnostics.StandardDiagnostics, main): Found file for var socketTime type: 3 Nov 6, 2002 6:38:41 PM (freenet.diagnostics.StandardDiagnostics, main): Did NOT find file for var socketTime type: 4 What are those limits, and how do they work? Freenet contains numerous arguably totally arbitrary limits, partly due to java's inability to give us any real load statistics. So, twiddle 'em till it works then tell the list so they can copy me. Got it :) Second problem. Downloading the jargon file single html file, the FEC error popped up in my browser again - and then non human readable stuff started filling my browser window. Will look at this. Annoyingly the system overloaded my CPU and I had to crash it before I could capture it. Eh? I didn't manage to get a copy of the junk it pasted into the browser - but it looked like [human ureadable] java.lang.eception.[human unreadable] Can the 'FEC download' to browser be made more understandable? Or, preferably, completely transparent? Also, had some interesting speculation in the irc channel - why does the graph fror your datastore include an entry for 1gig+ keys? Has anyone ever insderted such a key - and what would happen if someone inserted 10 20gig keys or so and requested them from elsewhere on the network to forve their propogation? No, because nodes only cache keys up to 1/200th the size of the datastore. When you include fields, this means that to cache a 1gb key you'd need a 210GB node or so - certainly not the common case. If you want to insert really big files, use fishtools or fproxy to insert them as FEC splitfiles - and tell us how you get on. Ok - that makes sense. A similar question still occurs with more sanely sized keys - insert a large number of 5 meg keys and simultaneously request them from a large number of clients -watch that old data go bye bye. ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
