Re: [freenet-support] Announcement problem
At 02.45 11/02/03 -0500, you wrote: On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:07, Greg Wooledge wrote: Build 611? Are you sure about that? I have made contact with (unstable) nodes with build numbers as high as 663. Are you also seeing your problem with the stable builds? Sorry for the typo... that should say 661. Also tried it tonight with 556: no successful announcements, same types of exceptions I included before. I don't know if this is significant, but in the last couple of month my fresly bootsrapped node (now stable 552) has no traffic until I do some retrieve with fproxy; then it begin to have traffic that stabilize in a couple of hours. HTH. Marco -- + il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco+ * the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit* * Marco A. Calamari[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marcoc.it* * PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 * + DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B + ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Announcement problem
Nope, that is not it. I am *pretty* sure that this is the way: When announcing your node will send an announcement message with a specific HTL to 3 of the nodes in you routing table.. These three will in their turn distribute the announcement on to the best match in their routing table.. and so on until the HTL becomes zero.. Much like a plain insert. /N -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: den 11 februari 2003 15:50 To: Niklas Bergh Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Announcement problem At 12.53 11/02/03 +0100, you wrote: I have seen that earlier too but I haven't noticed it for a long time now.. I think that if your node has been running earlier and because of that is present in other nodes routingtables and thereby recieveing incoming connections everything should start working because of that... This is what I find strange; after announcement, I must be in routing tables of all nodes that are in my routing table this is the supposed way things works, isn't it ? Ciao. Marco /N -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 11 februari 2003 11:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Announcement problem At 02.45 11/02/03 -0500, you wrote: On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:07, Greg Wooledge wrote: Build 611? Are you sure about that? I have made contact with (unstable) nodes with build numbers as high as 663. Are you also seeing your problem with the stable builds? Sorry for the typo... that should say 661. Also tried it tonight with 556: no successful announcements, same types of exceptions I included before. I don't know if this is significant, but in the last couple of month my fresly bootsrapped node (now stable 552) has no traffic until I do some retrieve with fproxy; then it begin to have traffic that stabilize in a couple of hours. HTH. Marco -- + il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco+ * the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit* * Marco A. Calamari[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marcoc.it * * PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 * + DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B + ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support -- + il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco+ * the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit* * Marco A. Calamari[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marcoc.it* * PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 * + DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B + ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
FW: [freenet-support] Announcement problem
Mrgh.. The listserv sets the wrong reply to address in the mails from this list. Here comes a mail I thought I sent to the list two hours ago.. /N -Original Message- From: Niklas Bergh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: den 11 februari 2003 13:01 To: 'bdonlan' Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Announcement problem This is the last part of a debug-level log from one of my nodes that are idle without reason (One that is idle from startup that is.. Not one of those becoming idle after a number of days).. I can't really find a reason for the problems from it. If someone is interested in looking then help yourself ;) /N idle66nodeLog.zip Description: Zip compressed data
FW: Longtime idle connections, was: [freenet-support] Build 659 (unstable)
And another one -Original Message- From: Niklas Bergh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: den 11 februari 2003 12:57 To: 'Matthew Toseland' Subject: RE: Longtime idle connections, was: [freenet-support] Build 659 (unstable) On this particular node maxmimumThreads are set to 300 so everything is order from that aspect... /N ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] ARKs are amazing
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] ARKs are amazing
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] ARKs are amazing
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:03 pm, Sascha Wüstemann wrote: ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support Um, is somethign wrong with the server? Every message on the support list I've ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
bdonlan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Um, is somethign wrong with the server? Every message on the support list I've Consider this a test. This message consists of three lines of original content, in addition to the attribution, one quoted line, and signature. If you see all three lines, then the problem is your KMail setup. -- Greg Wooledge | Truth belongs to everybody. [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | msg02903/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[freenet-support] FCPTools; fcpput ready for testing
Apologies; I used automake 1.5 instead of 1.4. KDE requires 1.5 and I never downgraded since working with KDE. I just tested the CVS head in a clean tree on sf's compile farm.. any problems let me know. Source tarballs: http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/fcptools-unstable.tgz Pre-compiled Win32 binary: http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/fcptools-bin.zip fcpput --help for usage instructions. -- Jay Oliveri In the land of the blind, GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54 the one-eyed man is king. FCPTools Maintainer www.sf.net/users/joliveri ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
