Hi
I'm also running a node on my private serverfarm and accessing it from home.
I succesfully created ssl tunnel with stunnel from my Linux router to my
Linux server for surfing freenet with my browser. My problem is that I'm
having trouble to create working stunnel between Fuqid (running on
don't worry, your node will automatically tell you when a newer version i=
s available (by noticing new build numbers within the network)
Usually :). Check the web site from time to time, or read this list or
devl, in case there's a reset.
This is not necessarily so. 99% of the time this
ack.
then i hope you're pleased with my other observations?
so one can say, a node is unusable without doubt if it has less than, say, 40
connections to other nodes, is halfway useable if less than 60 and after that it's
okay?
maybe the mainport could give credit to this and not only show the
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download anything
through stunnel, logs say Fatal error in download thread: EFCPError: recv
failed: 10054.
Markus
Hi
I'm also running a node on my private
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:31:01 +0300
Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download anything
through stunnel, logs say Fatal error in download thread: EFCPError: recv
S writes:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:31:01 +0300
Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download anything
through stunnel, logs say Fatal error in download thread: EFCPError: recv
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download
anything
through stunnel, logs say Fatal error in download thread: EFCPError:
recv
failed: 10054.
10054 is the Winsock error code for Connection
S writes:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:31:01 +0300
Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say
that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download
anything
through stunnel, logs say Fatal error in download thread:
Windows XP Home
1.8 GHz
384 MB RAM
Installed Build 5090
Load has been 0 to 1% for 3 days.
Open Connections:
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 0 (0/0/200)
Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 0 (0/0)
Data waiting to be transferred None
Total amount of data transferred
Windows XP Home
1.8 GHz
384 MB RAM
Installed Build 5090
Load has been 0 to 1% for 3 days.
INFO: Native CPUID library
'freenet/support/CPUInformation/jcpuid-x86-windows.dll' loaded from resource
INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library
'net/i2p/util/jbigi-windows-pentium4.dll' loaded from
Try changing it to -Xmx160M. That should fix the problem and allow you
to reseed. You can change it back afterwards. 5091 will solve the
problem by implementing a hack to use less memory, will be out today or
tomorrow. Apologies for the delay.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 04:07:50AM +0200, Heine
Ugh. No thanks, it's simply not that predictable, and it changes
constantly.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 09:11:51AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ack.
then i hope you're pleased with my other observations?
so one can say, a node is unusable without doubt if it has less than, say, 40
Don't use stunnel, use ssh, and forward the ports. Stunnel just creates
an HTTPS connection, right?
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:31:01AM +0300, Markus wrote:
Ouch, typo in Fuqids configuration (wrong port). Now it doesn't say that
node is overloaded or down, but I still can't get it to download
Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL
Don't use stunnel, use ssh, and forward the ports. Stunnel just creates
an HTTPS connection, right?
From Stunnel's man page
(http://www.stunnel.org/faq/stunnel.html#description):
The stunnel program is designed to work as SSL encryption wrapper between
remote clients and local (inetd-startable)
Am Sonntag, 8. August 2004 13:48 schrieb Anonymous:
...
yes, disk is in full thrash.. cpu maxed. other processes grinding to a
halt.
...
64mb (best this mb will do)
...
Sorry to say that, but just forget this for now.
My node is P1/200 with 128MB of RAM (Gentoo Linux) and i had to choke it
Ahh, okay. As long as it doesn't need the clients to be ssl aware.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:48:44PM +0300, Markus wrote:
Don't use stunnel, use ssh, and forward the ports. Stunnel just creates
an HTTPS connection, right?
From Stunnel's man page
Have you tried reseeding?
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:44:55AM +, Sam wrote:
Windows XP Home
1.8 GHz
384 MB RAM
Installed Build 5090
Load has been 0 to 1% for 3 days.
Open Connections:
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 0 (0/0/200)
Transfers active
Known bug will be fixed in 5091.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:37:06AM +, Sam wrote:
Windows XP Home
1.8 GHz
384 MB RAM
Installed Build 5090
Load has been 0 to 1% for 3 days.
INFO: Native CPUID library
'freenet/support/CPUInformation/jcpuid-x86-windows.dll' loaded from resource
Am Dienstag, 10. August 2004 21:41 schrieb Steve:
Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
short answer: No!
long answer: The store fills up when your node serves requests from others
and you (the user). If a requested key is already in the store, your node
just sends this and
sorry, messed up the last mail a bit, but the text is valid!
good byte
pgpkft2zi46m6.pgp
Description: signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at
Am Dienstag, 10. August 2004 20:23 schrieb Ralph Towner:
Can you please help me. For years I've never had problems to connect
to freenet, but since some days ago I can't anymore. What could be the
problem? I include my logfile.
Thanks!
The seednodes.ref file is quite big nowadays. that is
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote:
Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
Not really, but enlarging your datastore all the time will prevent
specialisation. This isn't real bad, but specialisation improves routing. If
I were you I would let it specialise at one
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 00:12, Martin Scheffler wrote:
My node is P1/200 with 128MB of RAM (Gentoo Linux) and i had to choke it
really hard to get it working more than 12 hours without restart.
(Now it does, but not very powerful operation)
Holy bleep! My PIV 2.66 GHz with 256 MB RAM had
Hmmm. Am I wrong to think there probably is an optimal store size for
each node?
My thinking is that as the store grows, the node draws more requests,
which at some point will exceed the node's ability to service them all
in a timely manner due to resource limits (probably bandwidth).
As the
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 00:55 schrieb Michael Kuijn:
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote:
Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
Not really, but enlarging your datastore all the time will prevent
specialisation. This isn't real bad, but specialisation improves
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 01:06 schrieb Derek Ferguson:
Hmmm. Am I wrong to think there probably is an optimal store size for
each node?
Sorry, yes.
My thinking is that as the store grows, the node draws more requests,
which at some point will exceed the node's ability to service them all
Stable build 5091 is now available. Please upgrade.
To upgrade:
On Windows, use the update option on the start menu, if it is there.
On linux, stop the node, run update.sh, and start it.
On any platform, stop the node, fetch
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar and overwrite
28 matches
Mail list logo
