Neither client or server has to be ssl aware.
Markus
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ahh, okay. As long as it doesn't need the clients to be ssl aware.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 03:07, Toad wrote:
Stable build 5091 is now available. Please upgrade.
Woohoo! They did it again. Thanks!
--
Michael A. Kuijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
/\- against microsoft attachments
(I'm not complaining. I'm just providing info in case anyone wants it.)
Windows XP Home
1.8 GHz
384 MB RAM
Installed Build 5090 from Start menu, including new seednodes file.
Load was 5-10% at first.
Frost and Spider have been running for 6 hours.
Now 7 hours later load is stable at 1%.
Memory
Any error messages in the log? I recommend that you upgrade your node to
a v5091.. Which solves an issue wrt merging a new seednodes file
(reseeding).
Cheers
/N
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam
Sent: den 11 augusti 2004 13:37
To:
Debatable point...
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:13:08AM +0200, Martin Scheffler wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 00:55 schrieb Michael Kuijn:
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote:
Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
Not really, but enlarging your datastore
Reason for email:
I just installed Freenet on a Windows machine. This wasn't an update, this was
a fresh install. I told the Windows installer to not create shortcuts, but
it did. This is strange, because it hasn't done this before. I went through
step-by-step, and when I got to the place
Quoting myself:
On yet another note, can't we have a separate build updater? Separate from
the installer, I mean. It doesn't make sense to answer where I want the
installation to go on the filesystem, and whether or not to create shortcuts,
when I'm updating an existing installation.
I'm working on setting up a freenet node on a machine running FreeBSD
4.6. The java vm that is already installed (and is the most current
version) is a java 1.3 vm. Sun does not release a vm for the BSDs. At
the moment I'm planing on compiling the jdk from the source provided
by sun with the
Paul wrote:
I'm working on setting up a freenet node on a machine running FreeBSD
4.6. The java vm that is already installed (and is the most current
version) is a java 1.3 vm. Sun does not release a vm for the BSDs. At
You really need at last the (possibly latest) 1.4 jvm, sorry.
Me, I use
The binary on the server at the moment is a 1.3 vm. To get the 1.4 vm
working you have to download the source and some binaries from sun's
site, apply a patch from the bsd team, and then compile it. (all
because of sun's lisense) Sounds simple enough execpt compiling it
requires a java vm.
~Paul
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 04:39:04PM +0200, lflesch.domicile wrote:
I'm actually making a tree with freenet.
Installed freenet build 5090 on XP pro + frost.
I have configured my node as permanent node and have made a reseed with the seednode
found on freenet homepage.
Everything seems
It's a recent addition. The question is, is it included by the
installer? Further, should it be included in the Distribution Servlet?
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 08:07:43AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting myself:
On yet another note, can't we have a separate build updater? Separate from
12 matches
Mail list logo
