On 22 Aug 2006, at 20:37, an ominous cow herd wrote:You never experienced World War I, but I bet you know something about it.Yes, but I wouldn't lecture those who had actually experienced it, and I think you will find Freenet 0.7 a somewhat more pleasant experience than the first world war.Ian.
Which datastores can i delete so my inserts still can resume at what
ever % they are at current state?
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at
is there any way to limit the log size so i dont keep getting 1 gig logs
all the time?
ive set max 100k lines in ram, 10M in ram
and 50M Maximum disk space used by old logs
still getting several hunderes meg sized logs
___
Support mailing list
try setting the log level from NORMAL to ERROR.
also... why are your logs this big? o_O
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:09:09 +0200, Stefan Grönberg wrote:
is there any way to limit the log size so i dont keep getting 1 gig logs
all the time?
ive set max 100k lines in ram, 10M in ram
and 50M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try setting the log level from NORMAL to ERROR.
its at minor atm since i got tons of problems daily with my node.
also... why are your logs this big? o_O
same as above id guess, i get perhaps 5-15gig logs a day or something
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006
try to avoid setting the log level to DEBUG or MINOR.. that's insane - no wonder your logs are that big :D
then again i suppose "Maximum disk space used by old logs" should work nevetheless if i understand it's purpose correctly...
--Original Message Text---
From: Stefan Grönberg
I'm new to Freenet and have been watching the discussion about version 0.5
vs 0.7. I'm not sure what is meant when the 0.5 advocates talk about
OpenNet, so could someone enlighten me? I went to the Freenet site hoping to
find information related to 0.5, even in the WIKI, but it now only
With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all.
Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400
connections with the default settings. And 0.5 has more content and
probably more users, though I'm not sure on that one.
On 8/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
On 8/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all.
Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400
connections with the default settings. And 0.5 has more content and
probably more users, though I'm not sure
Yes it will work, however it only works for old logs i.e. gzipped logs;
it doesn't limit the size of either a single gzipped logfile, or the
uncompressed freenet-latest etc logs.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:09:17PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try to avoid setting the log level to DEBUG or
400 connections? I hardly ever saw more than 100.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:09:59AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all.
Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400
connections with the default settings. And
Current svn snapshot:
Aug 23, 2006 17:08:08:818 (freenet.client.async.SplitFileFetcherSegment, FCP
input handler for /127.0.0.1:2580, ERROR): Failing with
FetchException:Cancelled:null:-1:null:false:null:null but already started decode
FetchException:Cancelled:null:-1:null:false:null:null
The stable version of WW1 was so much better...On 8/23/06, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 Aug 2006, at 20:37, an ominous cow herd wrote:You never experienced World War I, but I bet you know something about it.
Yes, but I wouldn't lecture those who had actually experienced it, and I
My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50 connections right now and
I'm not doing anything. Not running frost, not surving any sites...all
inbound I guess.
On 8/23/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
400 connections? I hardly ever saw more than 100.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at
Freenet 0.7 build 953 is now available. It should be deployed through
the auto-updater very soon, and it is already downloadable through the
update scripts. Please upgrade. Changelogs:
953:
- Probably fix insert resuming (again!!)
- Turn off aggressiveGC for now
- Restart non-global persistent
Hi there.I am new to this so please bear with me.I am trying to install Freenet and find I am unable to connect to it. It appears to have not installed properly and was wondering if I could get some advice on what to do to be able to install it correctly or if it is how to fix the error listed
Please try again, nextgens has changed something in the installer that
might help.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:12:20PM +0100, simon gallienne wrote:
Hi there.
I am new to this so please bear with me.
I am trying to install Freenet and find I am unable to connect to it. It
appears to have
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
Project Dantooine mixminion server at Dantooine.winstonsmith.info. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about anonymity, see
Please foreward a copy of the unstable version of WW1. Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: Ortwin Regel
To: support@freenetproject.org
Sent: 8/23/2006 1:39:36 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7
The stable version of WW1 was so much better...
On 8/23/06, Ian
Why bother even anonymizing your emails if you insist on running an
unsupported (and therefore seriously insecure) operating system?
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:03:55PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
Project Dantooine
0.7 isn't a stable version either. It's a not nearly completed, far
from functional version.
On 8/23/06, Ortwin Regel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0.5 isn't a stable version. It's an outdated version that many people
happen to use. Of course you can keep using 0.5 and slowly watch it
die, or even
Wrong, it works quite well so it's functional. It's not completed but it needs users to progress.On 8/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:0.7
isn't a stable version either. It's a not nearly completed, farfrom functional version.On 8/23/06, Ortwin Regel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 0.5
It has no opennet. As far as I'm concerned, it's useless.
On 8/23/06, Ortwin Regel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong, it works quite well so it's functional. It's not completed but it
needs users to progress.
On 8/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0.7 isn't a stable version
Please move this conversation to the chat mailing list, it really doesn't belong here.Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog ___
Support mailing list
Mine fluctuates between 100 and 200 active connections with 800 known nodes.
I have seen people bragging about having several hundred active connections
and thousands of known nodes.
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 11:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50
first world war.
Ian.
Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc.
phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/2006
Which datastores can i delete so my inserts still can resume at what
ever % they are at current state?
is there any way to limit the log size so i dont keep getting 1 gig logs
all the time?
ive set max 100k lines in ram, 10M in ram
and 50M Maximum disk space used by old logs
still getting several hunderes meg sized logs
try setting the log level from NORMAL to ERROR.
also... why are your logs this big? o_O
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:09:09 +0200, Stefan Gr??nberg wrote:
>is there any way to limit the log size so i dont keep getting 1 gig logs
>all the time?
>
>ive set max 100k lines in ram, 10M in ram
>and 50M
; Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060823/36bc8cdf/attachment.html>
next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060823/670269ee/attachment.html>
I'm new to Freenet and have been watching the discussion about version 0.5
vs 0.7. I'm not sure what is meant when the 0.5 advocates talk about
OpenNet, so could someone enlighten me? I went to the Freenet site hoping to
find information related to 0.5, even in the WIKI, but it now only
With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all.
Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400
connections with the default settings. And 0.5 has more content and
probably more users, though I'm not sure on that one.
On 8/23/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com
On 8/23/06, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote:
> With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all.
> Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400
> connections with the default settings. And 0.5 has more content and
> probably more users, though I'm not sure on
ct Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060823/cecde4c7/attachment.pgp>
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060823/3c4f8295/attachment.pgp>
Current svn snapshot:
Aug 23, 2006 17:08:08:818 (freenet.client.async.SplitFileFetcherSegment, FCP
input handler for /127.0.0.1:2580, ERROR): Failing with
FetchException:Cancelled:null:-1:null:false:null:null but already started decode
FetchException:Cancelled:null:-1:null:false:null:null
ort-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060823/8bab0cab/attachment.html>
My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50 connections right now and
I'm not doing anything. Not running frost, not surving any sites...all
inbound I guess.
On 8/23/06, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> 400 connections? I hardly ever saw more than 100.
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:09:59AM -0400,
: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060823/47900c06/attachment.pgp>
y thanks in advance.
-
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo!
Security Centre.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060823/f27e3b56/attachment.html>
This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
Project Dantooine mixminion server at Dantooine.winstonsmith.info. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox-
admin at winstonsmith.info. For more information about anonymity, see
chments/20060823/2710e561/attachment.html>
0.7 isn't a stable version either. It's a not nearly completed, far
from functional version.
On 8/23/06, Ortwin Regel wrote:
> 0.5 isn't a stable version. It's an outdated version that many people
> happen to use. Of course you can keep using 0.5 and slowly watch it
> die, or even try to keep it
It has no opennet. As far as I'm concerned, it's useless.
On 8/23/06, Ortwin Regel wrote:
> Wrong, it works quite well so it's functional. It's not completed but it
> needs users to progress.
>
>
> On 8/24/06, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote:
> >
> 0.7 isn't a stable version either. It's a not
Thank you for the reply. I was hoping that you might actually answer the
other part of the message
The past Freenet had two branches, the stable and unstable. ?The unstable
branch was the one where active coding was performed. ?The stable branch did
not get updated often if at all.
My
t;https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060823/27ed8e94/attachment.html>
Mine fluctuates between 100 and 200 active connections with 800 known nodes.
I have seen people bragging about having several hundred active connections
and thousands of known nodes.
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 11:19, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote:
> My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50
48 matches
Mail list logo
