Re: [freenet-support] No subject

2009-10-11 Thread Dsoslglece

l...@hushmail.com a écrit :
The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked 
AND that it says,

“This is untraceable, safe….”   NOW, untraceable means anonymous.
The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from 
Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT 
ANONYMOUS!

The meaning is :

“Fetch over Freenet, this is untraceable, safe….:

To download the plugin, you use freenet (of course this is safe).

“Fetch over the web from 
Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE



To download the plugin, you go out of freenet and from the web, in the 
big dark forest, using your browser and all nude, you go to freenet's 
central servers.
and this obviously is traceable and not safe, since you are not using 
freenet anymore... (of course, doing this,  you still can use Tor, or 
jap for some protection)
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] No subject

2009-10-11 Thread Dsoslglece

Evan Daniel a écrit :

On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:13 PM,  l...@hushmail.com wrote:
  

Hello. I hope this is OK. It’s quite long.

I wonder if anyone can help with this/these question/s-comment/s in
the form of clarification. I hope it doesn’t seem too petty but I
wonder if others go through the same confusion as I.

On this page: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ one can go to: “Load
Official Plugin”
The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked
AND that it says,
“This is untraceable, safe….”   NOW, untraceable means anonymous.
The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from
Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT
ANONYMOUS!

(Freenet isn’t safe?)

On this page: FREEMAIL-SETUP
http://127.0.0.1:/freenet:u...@xog49gnltumtjjzj0fvzugdpo4hjusy2us
GQkjE7NY4,EtUH5b9gGpp8JiY-Bm-Y9kHX1q-yDjD-
9oRzXn21O9k,AQACAAE/freemail/4/setup/index.html

It clearly directs one method of using the same plugin page as my
beginning comment above (Load Official Plugin), with the “only”
comment for that choice being that it is NOT ANONYMOUS!

So, is one correct to assume that the first directive is false,
misleading and/or has been tampered with (edited) by someone with
bad intent? Or is it the second one?

One point I am trying to make here is that this can cause some
immediate doubt and confusion in someone new to Freenet. I am
concerned because the world needs Freenet and Tor more than they
might consciously know. I recently saw figures about the estimated
number of users for both, and the numbers were very small. They are
small enough that large arrays of computers, set around the world
and networked, are capable of watching ALL nodes and gathering the
data to be analyzed.

Look at Tor. On the Network Map (of the world), there are nodes
running in sequential order, and all these are located in the same
place – near the CIA in the US.
Some of these sequential orders are showing up in other locations
around the Tor network.

I have found Freenet to be so frustrating and confusing to set up
and use, that as I search the web for information that is clear and
helpful, I keep coming across more comments from Users who are
quitting the program. Now it does make sense to me, that with
anonymity programs, the more using them, the better and more safely
anonymous it is for all. But, it seems the numbers are dwindling. I
don’t know.

I have used Tor for about 4 years. I recently went to its Hidden
Wiki and about one half of all its services were gone! So, I
wonder, as do others, is Tor is dying out?

I really don’t want to see that for Tor or Freenet.

If one goes to: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ first, before
finding the .jar or .zip download page (supposedly both are
anonymous but of course, IT DOESN’T SAY, then they might make a
very bad choice solely from being confused by the directions.

So, while this might seem very petty and/or trivial to (I don’t
know-most who might read this), it is very important to write
directions for the reader, not the writer!

In Tor, the Hidden Services may be tampered with, changed,
purposely to be misleading and dangerous, by those who want to
destroy anonymity and our right to it. They use anonymity to try
and destroy anonymity, except for them, of course.

Is this also possible with the Freenet pages of “howto’s?” Can they
be edited so that one is not aware of what is true, accurate and
good for the User?

Anyway, I am once more trying to set up Freenet, Freemail and Frost
and am close to quitting. If I were more knowledgeable, I would
write “howto’s” but I am not. It seems all I am is frustrated.

One last thing, at Freemail-Setup, it tells me to download
Freemail. The next bit of ‘howto’ is setting it up for “command
line version setup”.

I’m not doing that.

I don’t know the pros and cons of command line Freemail. At the end
of that instruction it says, “Now you have Freemail proxy
running….”
I DO? How? I didn’t do that so what the fuck happened? Does the
download set it up or does it have to be set up after it’s
downloaded? The latter makes sense to me but, it is now telling me
I already have it running without doing anything. So, why the
instructions? I mean, C’mon! I have to go by what the writer
writes, right?

Since it tells me I have it up and running, where is it? I can’t
find it. These instructions are telling me to insert the long
Freemail address I was given.
I was given? When? Where? I haven’t done anything yet but the
directions jump from something I don’t want to do and didn’t do,
to, “I’m up and running!”

This is a joke right? It’s only for those who are IT smart, meaning
very few, and anonymity will be shot on site.

Just before it gets to THUNDERBIRD, it tells me, “Remember that the
Freemail.jar program needs to be running whilst you are reading and
sending emails. So, where is it? There is no window to put in
any information.

Perhaps if I could get some help, yeah, I might be able to help
others.

Sorry for the rant but 

Re: [freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 49, Issue 10

2009-10-11 Thread Bob Southwell
well, i'm free right now, although at a clients by myself. What is your
number?
Bob

2009/10/11 support-requ...@freenetproject.org

 Send Support mailing list submissions to
support@freenetproject.org

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
support-requ...@freenetproject.org

 You can reach the person managing the list at
support-ow...@freenetproject.org

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of Support digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. Re: No subject (Dsoslglece)
   2. Re: No subject (Dsoslglece)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:31:49 +0200
 From: Dsoslglece dsoslgl...@orange.fr
 Subject: Re: [freenet-support] No subject
 To: support@freenetproject.org
 Message-ID: 4ad197f5.20...@orange.fr
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

 l...@hushmail.com a ?crit :
  The viewer can see, as did I, that ?Fetch over Freenet is checked
  AND that it says,
  ?This is untraceable, safe?.?   NOW, untraceable means anonymous.
  The other choice available is to, ?Fetch over the web from
  Freenet?s central servers?and is ?TRACEABLE?, meaning NOT
  ANONYMOUS!
 The meaning is :

  ?Fetch over Freenet, this is untraceable, safe?.:

 To download the plugin, you use freenet (of course this is safe).

 ?Fetch over the web from
 Freenet?s central servers?and is ?TRACEABLE


 To download the plugin, you go out of freenet and from the web, in the
 big dark forest, using your browser and all nude, you go to freenet's
 central servers.
 and this obviously is traceable and not safe, since you are not using
 freenet anymore... (of course, doing this,  you still can use Tor, or
 jap for some protection)
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20091011/bf586d37/attachment.htm

 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:08:43 +0200
 From: Dsoslglece dsoslgl...@orange.fr
 Subject: Re: [freenet-support] No subject
 To: ev...@pobox.com, support@freenetproject.org
 Message-ID: 4ad1a09b.3070...@orange.fr
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

 Evan Daniel a ?crit :
  On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:13 PM,  l...@hushmail.com wrote:
 
  Hello. I hope this is OK. It?s quite long.
 
  I wonder if anyone can help with this/these question/s-comment/s in
  the form of clarification. I hope it doesn?t seem too petty but I
  wonder if others go through the same confusion as I.
 
  On this page: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ one can go to: ?Load
  Official Plugin?
  The viewer can see, as did I, that ?Fetch over Freenet is checked
  AND that it says,
  ?This is untraceable, safe?.?   NOW, untraceable means anonymous.
  The other choice available is to, ?Fetch over the web from
  Freenet?s central servers?and is ?TRACEABLE?, meaning NOT
  ANONYMOUS!
 
  (Freenet isn?t safe?)
 
  On this page: FREEMAIL-SETUP
  http://127.0.0.1:/freenet:u...@xog49gnltumtjjzj0fvzugdpo4hjusy2us
  GQkjE7NY4,EtUH5b9gGpp8JiY-Bm-Y9kHX1q-yDjD-
  9oRzXn21O9k,AQACAAE/freemail/4/setup/index.html
 
  It clearly directs one method of using the same plugin page as my
  beginning comment above (Load Official Plugin), with the ?only?
  comment for that choice being that it is NOT ANONYMOUS!
 
  So, is one correct to assume that the first directive is false,
  misleading and/or has been tampered with (edited) by someone with
  bad intent? Or is it the second one?
 
  One point I am trying to make here is that this can cause some
  immediate doubt and confusion in someone new to Freenet. I am
  concerned because the world needs Freenet and Tor more than they
  might consciously know. I recently saw figures about the estimated
  number of users for both, and the numbers were very small. They are
  small enough that large arrays of computers, set around the world
  and networked, are capable of watching ALL nodes and gathering the
  data to be analyzed.
 
  Look at Tor. On the Network Map (of the world), there are nodes
  running in sequential order, and all these are located in the same
  place ? near the CIA in the US.
  Some of these sequential orders are showing up in other locations
  around the Tor network.
 
  I have found Freenet to be so frustrating and confusing to set up
  and use, that as I search the web for information that is clear and
  helpful, I keep coming across more comments from Users who are
  quitting the program. Now it does make sense to me, that with
  anonymity programs, the more using them, the better and more safely
  anonymous it is for all. But, it seems the numbers are dwindling. I
  don?t know.
 
  I have used Tor for about 4 years. I recently went to its Hidden
  Wiki and about one half of all its services were gone

Re: [freenet-support] Privacy (Was: No subject)

2009-10-11 Thread SmallSister development
VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
 This point has already been answered, but i feel that there is a
 point that can be made here by answering it again.
 
 When you fetch something from the regular internet, the request is
 easily traceable back to you. The warning that you see tells you that
 for that reason. The question is how did you get Freenet to run? If
 you have downloaded the installer from the official freenet site, or
 even if you have just visited the site without the use of Tor,
 somebody can potentially see that. It's the same with plug-ins.

 Anyhow, back to my original point. When you download plugin (or
 anything else Freenet-related) from the Web, you identify yourself as
 a user of Freenet. That (in and of itself) does not tell anybody
 exactly what you say on Freenet (although may identify how you say
 that... downloading Freemail says that you will be sending Freemail
 messages, downloading Frost says you will be a frost user, etc.)

When you run Freenet, it will generate a specific pattern of network
usage and it would not be too hard for an ISP to map a large part of the
Freenet nodes if it has a few nodes on its network. (It is also possible
to map the network by adding a monitoring node, no real privacy leak
here for Opennet nodes.)
Assume The Internet knows you are running a Freenet node. And your ISP
(and relevant uplinks) are able to detect that you're running a Darknet
node!
ISPs should not know what you're reading over Freenet, but I would not
be surprised if they could do traffic analysis and determine whether
you're downloading or uploading large files. (Has someone tried and
published before?)
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] freenet newbie: wrapper warning message

2009-10-11 Thread Bob Southwell
Hi,

I am new to Freenet. I have searched the archives but can find no clear
answers to my questions.

I am running Ubuntu 9.04, with a KDE desktop. I successfully almost
installed Freenet from the webpage using the java installer, it only had one
hiccup:

when installing it reported :


Enabling auto-start.
Installing cron job to start Freenet on reboot...
/home/bobs/Freenet/bin/install_autostart.sh: 3: [[: not found
Installed cron job.

But seems happy, and is running.  Is the 'install_autostart.sh .. not
found' anything to worry about?

I also notice that when first starting, and in the wrapper.log file the
following warning:

Starting Freenet 0.7...
STATUS | wrapper | 2009/10/11 23:27:19 | -- Wrapper Started as Daemon
STATUS | wrapper | 2009/10/11 23:27:19 | Launching a JVM...
INFO | jvm 1 | 2009/10/11 23:27:19 | WrapperManager: Initializing...
INFO | jvm 1 | 2009/10/11 23:27:20 | WrapperManager: WARNING - The Wrapper
jar file currently in use is version 3.3.1
INFO | jvm 1 | 2009/10/11 23:27:20 | WrapperManager: while the version of
the Wrapper which launched this JVM is
INFO | jvm 1 | 2009/10/11 23:27:20 | WrapperManager: 3.2.3.
INFO | jvm 1 | 2009/10/11 23:27:20 | WrapperManager: The Wrapper may appear
to work correctly but some features may
INFO | jvm 1 | 2009/10/11 23:27:20 | WrapperManager: not function correctly.
This configuration has not been tested
INFO | jvm 1 | 2009/10/11 23:27:20 | WrapperManager: and is not supported.

Is this anything to worry about? Or better still, is there a way to fix it?

Many thanks
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Can't get Freenet to work

2009-10-11 Thread Juiceman
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Ronald Quinn qronal...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have downloaded freenet and installed it.After It was done It said it
 had successfully installed but when I try to run it this message appears:

 Freenet start script was unable to start the freenet system service.
 Please reinstall freenet
 If the problem keeps occurring, please report this error to the developers.
 I've reinstalled it several times and it did no good. I'm not the most
 computer savvy person and I was wondering if I could get any help on the
 matter.
 thank you,
 Ron

What operating system?  Which installer did you use?


-- 
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet installation problem

2009-10-11 Thread Juiceman
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:32 AM, ahmed mohamed fall
mohamed...@yahoo.comwrote:

 Dear sirs

 While trying to install freenet, at the end, I received this error message
 : Freener start script was unable to control the Freenet system as it
 appears to be stuck. Please reinstall Freenet. If the problem keeps
 occuring, please report this message error to the developers

 I reinstalled Freenet but the problem persists

 So, I contact you to get solutioi to this problem

 Congratulations and Regards

 AHMED OULD MOHAMED FALL
 MOBILE : + 222 631 12 39

 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


What operating system?  Which installer did you use?

-- 
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death,
your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] problems with internet

2009-10-11 Thread urza9814
I've had that problem before actually, though it was on Freenet 0.5.
Is there still a way to set bandwidth limits? That's what I had to do.
Freenet saturated the network so heavily that while it was running
_nothing_ else would work.

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Juiceman juicema...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:11 AM,  lostser...@safe-mail.net wrote:
 hi.
 Internet through a router.
 after installing freenet, lost internet in opera, mozila, ie8
 emule and utorrent working properly.
 how to fix?

 It is possible that Freenet traffic is overloading your poor router,
 though if you can torrent this seems unlikely.  Please try rebooting
 your DSL/Cable modem and router.  If that doesn't work, shut down
 Freenet and see if that is the problem; if it is, I'm sorry to say
 uninstall Freenet or replace your router.

 --
 I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
 death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
 Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
 neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe




-- 
Brian Flowers
Webmaster, PSU Amnesty International
http://clubs.psu.edu/up/amnesty

President, PSU Students for a Sensible Drug Policy
http://PennStateSSDP.org

Vice President, PSU Linux Users Group
http://clubs.psu.edu/up/lug

Treasurer, PSU Amateur Radio Club
http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/k3cr/

Deveoper, FCON (Freenet Classic OpenNet)
http://fcon.sourceforge.net
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe