On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:01:28 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:49:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:17:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:55:58 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 20:14:52 Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:44:07 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:01:28 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:49:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:17:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:55:58 +, Matthew Toseland
CC'ing Martin in case he has any ideas.
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:01:28 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:49:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:17:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:55:58 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday
On Friday 28 January 2011 18:05:53 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:44:07 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:01:28 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:49:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:17:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:14:14 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
(My last flood occurred for over 10 minutes, and then managed to
stop. I believe all 5 of my connected strangers were listed as
BackedOff during the flood. I will try to provide more details
and more testing.)
Was
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:11:29 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
CC'ing Martin in case he has any ideas.
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:01:28 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:49:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:17:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27
I was referring to Freenet's custom congestion control. There is no
resending of UDP packets, unless Freenet pro-actively resends it.
Right, and what we do is we resend packets if they are not acknowledged after
a few round trips. Which is pretty much what TCP does.
I'm not entirely sure
