Re: [freenet-support] Update re: DFI
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:34:25 -0600 "Conrad J. Sabatier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still in the process of refining the spider and its results. One thing > I've done recently, which I'm not sure is a good idea or not, is to ignore > CHK keys. It's just my feeling that a "real" freesite should use an SSK. > Similarly, KSKs are passed right over as well. > > If anyone knows why this may be a bad idea, please let me know. Due to the difficulty inserting freesites with e.g. FIW, is it possible that some people are inserting large portions of their freesite via FUQID and using FIW only to insert the index? If so, that may be a reason to keep spidering CHKs at least for now. -s ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Update re: DFI
I've finally gotten around to adding a NIM feedback form to DFI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/DFI//), so if anyone has any comments, please feel free. I'm still in the process of refining the spider and its results. One thing I've done recently, which I'm not sure is a good idea or not, is to ignore CHK keys. It's just my feeling that a "real" freesite should use an SSK. Similarly, KSKs are passed right over as well. If anyone knows why this may be a bad idea, please let me know. Thanks. -- Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas" freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/DFI// ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Log entry
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 7 in queue, 3156 millis since enqueued last item, 483698 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel. JVM Version: Sun 1.4.2_01-b06 OS: Win2KPro SP4 with all MS updates. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] HTL
Given network topology, and current lack of specialisation, is there any systematic difference in either the number of nodes contacted or the particular nodes contacted between having 100 attempts to find something with HTL=5 and having 20 attempts with HTL 25? Or will the HTL=25 attempts take more than five times as long as the HTL=5 attempts, if carried out serially? Just trying to understand the effect of retrying to find something. -- Roger Hayter ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
FW: RE: [freenet-support] node references
--- Robert Greenage --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- EarthLink: It's your Internet. > [Original Message] > From: Robert Greenage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 12/12/03 7:03:46 AM > Subject: RE: [freenet-support] node references > > i upgraded to 5050, manually reseeded and i still cannot get any connections. for awhile with 5048 i was able to get many connections easily and then it stopped. iam using win98se,500 mz PIII,192 RAM and a dual HDD master= 10 Gigs and slave = 30 GIGS, java 1.4.2_01-b06.I am running the freeware version of Zone Alarm 3.7.202. Allowing all java apps to have internet access. Open connections 0(0/40/0). The routing table which had been full back in version 5037 or some such is totally empty.Number of node references =19 ,number of nodes contacted = 0.What, if anyting, am I doing wrong or...need to do differently? > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Niklas Bergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 12/11/03 10:56:19 AM > > Subject: RE: [freenet-support] node references > > > > >i am updating my node references. the message says this should only > > take a minute. It > > >has been saying >>that for over ten minutes now . is that normal? > > > > Nope.. Try downloading the seednodes.ref file manually from > > http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref > > > > Put it in the 'Freenet' folder on your harddrive and restart the node to > > make use of it. > > > > /N > > > > ___ > > Support mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Re: [freenet-support] huge storeSize/key expiration
How do you know it's deleting data? Meaning: Are you sure it's deleting datastore data? By default the temp folder is in the datastore directory. I wouldn't be surprised if Freenet were deleting temp stuff. -todd On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 20:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've got a nice new machine that I built, and I'm willing to share it with > freenet. I set my storeSize to 10G, but I've noticed that freenet seems to > automatically delete data from time to time. I'm not a freenet expert and I > don't completely understand it's architecture, but I'm wondering why it's > deleting data when it's nowhere near the size I've alocated for the store. I > guess I'm just asking how can I best get my node to utilized the resources > I'm giving it. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
