On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:02:21 +
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main change here is to reduce the maximum HTL to 10.
Is this enforced by fred, or just the new default?
-s
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yesterday I decided to test freenet again after a long time of
resignation.
I downloaded and updated to the latest stable. It even seemed to work
well. I was so enthusiastic, I even planned to set up a permanent node
though performance was terrible even after two or three hours on a
broadband
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:33:42 +0100
Maximilian Mehnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet is one of the most beautiful ideas I ever hit on.
But it should be possible to run it on a small pentium machine with no
more than 100MB of RAM.
I agree 100%. I have a machine dedicated to Freenet. It
"Basicly this network here is screwed
up!"
O, so you are using Freenet already? ;-)
Basically, the stable build is currently really shitty. I
suggest you install the unstable build. (6452 it is currently, I believe).
Also,keep in mind that even unstable is beta (duh), and it needs a few
Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of whack.
In fact that sounds insane. Which threadFactory is your configuration
file set to use? If you set it to use the YThreadFactory, do things
improve?
At the moment it looks ok. I upgraded to 5065 and I'm using
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of S
Sent: den 28 januari 2004 13:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:33:42 +0100
Maximilian Mehnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
