On 29/01/2004, at 10:13 PM, Maximilian Mehnert wrote:
Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28:
Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of
whack.
In fact that sounds insane. Which threadFactory is your configuration
file set to use? If you set it to use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or
No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is
also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and
will probably continue to use it
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or similar.
I received the following error message on the console where Fred was running.
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 16 in queue, 2463 millis since enqueued last item,
5507 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel.
On 31/01/2004, at 12:32 PM, David Masover wrote:
| Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko
or
No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is
also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and
will probably continue to use
Toad wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:27:19AM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU,
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or similar.
Um, yes - we do, dodo.
Ian.
Before anybody thinks Ian wroke up
