-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mika Hirvonen randomly hit the keyboard and managed to write on 21/03/2004 21:38:
Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2004 13:28, Niklas Bergh wrote:
You mean like we do with
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref.bz2
That's
> 2) Even after having the node up for a wile and(!)
> successfully downloading content, the node more often
> fails to route the request to other nodes than before
> NG-routing. Wihtout NG routing I was able to have
> request returned with 25 HTL with a "data not found"
> error - a clear indicatio
Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2004 13:28, Niklas Bergh wrote:
You mean like we do with
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref.bz2
That's nice to know but update.sh doesn't use it. So I guess most
Freenet-users download the big uncompressed file.
Yes, it does.
On Sunday 21 March 2004 13:28, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> You mean like we do with
> http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref.bz2
That's nice to know but update.sh doesn't use it. So I guess most
Freenet-users download the big uncompressed file.
BTW: I'm on the list.
with regards,
Max Morit
S wrote:
1MB doesn't sound unusual. 905 distinct nodes in 1MB's worth of space
does sound unusual. What's the date on your seednodes.ref?
12th October 2003... that does seem a bit old.
Maybe it's
using the classic routing scheme, with no estimators.
Looking at http://freenetproject.org/snapshot
1MB doesn't sound unusual. 905 distinct nodes in 1MB's worth of space
does sound unusual. What's the date on your seednodes.ref? Maybe it's
using the classic routing scheme, with no estimators. Maybe you're
counting the entries incorrectly?
I just checked the 1.9MB seednodes.ref in snapshots,
$ l
Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
This bings me to mind why don't we compress the
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref with gzip or bzip2?
We do.
--
Mika Hirvonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://nightwatch.mine.nu/
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL
You mean like we do with
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref.bz2
:)
/N
- Original Message -
From: "Max Moritz Sievers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] seednodes.ref abnormally large?
> This b
Ok... seing that the seednodes.ref on the snapshot site is 2.5 mb, maybe
my 1 mb isn't that big.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
This bings me to mind why don't we compress the
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref with gzip or bzip2?
with regards,
Max Moritz Sievers
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubs
Hi,
My seednodes.ref is nearly 1mb in size, with (I worked out) 905 entries
in it. I've downloaded a couple from freenet, and they're both a lot
smaller, with about 50 entries. The one from Reskill has 49 entries. Is
the size of my seednodes.ref normal? I'm using build 5076.
Thanks,
Michal.
_
11 matches
Mail list logo