[freenet-support] Licence

2004-05-10 Thread Hibbs, Phil
I was a little amused to discover that the Windows installer requires me to click I Agree to the GPL screen, despite the GPL stating specifically that 5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or distribute

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents

2004-05-10 Thread Toad
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now I believe I can live with freenet being slow and that many documents are not immediately available. What is annoying me is that _I_ will have to do the retrying. Why is that

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents

2004-05-10 Thread Toad
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:52:21PM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote: How would you distinguish messages you don't want very much (like possibly non-existent Frost messages) from ones you do want a lot? It is likely to generate quite a lot of extra traffic to automatically retry all RNFs till you

Re: [freenet-support] Licence

2004-05-10 Thread Toad
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:58:03PM +0100, Hibbs, Phil wrote: I was a little amused to discover that the Windows installer requires me to click I Agree to the GPL screen, despite the GPL stating specifically that 5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed it.

[freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents

2004-05-10 Thread Michael Schierl
Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Michael Schierl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes For me it seems as Fred is too fail-fast. It may try for a few more seconds or minutes instead of returning the RNF nearly immediately (and very often). Putting that retry to the user's side (being it the browser or

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents

2004-05-10 Thread vinyl1
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied: For me it seems as Fred is too fail-fast. It may try for a few more seconds or minutes instead of returning the RNF nearly immediately (and very often). Putting that retry to the user's side (being it the browser or a FCP app) is no good idea IMHO. Maybe so.

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents

2004-05-10 Thread Salah Coronya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 vinyl1 wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied: For me it seems as Fred is too fail-fast. It may try for a few more seconds or minutes instead of returning the RNF nearly immediately (and very often). Putting that retry to the user's side (being it

Re: [freenet-support] Couldn't Retrive Key

2004-05-10 Thread GumpyGal
i really can't give much more detail, it happen sporadically when I'm browsing freenet. sometimes it will give me the Couldn't Retrieve Key message several times in a row, but I'm always able to _eventually_ load a page without reconnecting to freenet or anything. it just slows down the process

Re: [freenet-support] Couldn't Retrive Key

2004-05-10 Thread Toad
Perfectly normal. It should perhaps happen less than it does, but freenet is still under development. On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 04:11:12PM -0700, GumpyGal wrote: i really can't give much more detail, it happen sporadically when I'm browsing freenet. sometimes it will give me the Couldn't

[freenet-support] 5078 (Stable) Just Sits There, Does Nothing

2004-05-10 Thread box3
Windows XP Pro After having Freenet disabled for a couple of weeks while I was doing some heavy downloading I decided to fire it up again. I figured it was a good idea to update the snapshot from 5077 first. Big mistake. Now it does nothing. All I did was update the snapshot and download