Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on NetBSD 1.6 (old java version)

2004-05-28 Thread Victor Denisov
Unfortunately, Freenet requires Java 1.4.x JVM, because it relies on nio (non-blocking input/output) API only available in 1.4.x. For the same reason, Freenet can't be run under open-source JVMs - Classpath's nio implementation is buggy (this _should_ change in the near future). Also, 1.4.0 had

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on NetBSD 1.6 (old java version)

2004-05-28 Thread Toad
A 1.4 JVM is an absolute requirement, because we use NIO. Sorry. Kaffe or GCJ might run on NetBSD, however, right now the NIO doesn't work on that either (bugs, being worked on, but can't give you a schedule). On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:23:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I recently

Re: [freenet-support] freenet on Mac OS X 10.3.3

2004-05-28 Thread Toad
Does it start anyway? On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:12:49AM +, Paul wrote: Hi. I have successfully run freenet on Mac OS X for some time. I have downloaded installed the latest stable, but when I attempt to start freenet, here is the result: iMac:~/freenet paul$ sh ./start-freenet.sh

[freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest

2004-05-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the messageSendTimeRequest seems to be tied the amount of data waiting to be

Re: [freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest

2004-05-28 Thread Toad
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:13:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-28 Thread Thomas Guyot-Sionnest
That's either not that speed, or not DSL! ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little faster for upload, but slower for download (up=down)... Even a dedicated T1 is not that fast, around 50Mbps! Thomas Guyot Dave wrote: You want to move to Japan instead. 100Mbits up, 100Mbits down DSL, for

[freenet-support] Re: messageSendTimeRequest

2004-05-28 Thread Wayne McDougall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. ... So is there anything I can do to reduce the load? Forgive me if this is too obvious, but I had the same problem