[freenet-support] Re: messageSendTimeRequest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds > successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. ... > So is there anything I can do to reduce the load? Forgive me if this is too obvious, but I had the same problem until I sent the outputbandwidth to an appropriate level. In your freenet.ini file: outputBandwidthLimit=12000 where 12000 is bytes per second and should not be your whole bandwidth capacity! ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?
That's either not that speed, or not DSL! ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little faster for upload, but slower for download (up=down)... Even a dedicated T1 is not that fast, around 50Mbps! Thomas Guyot Dave wrote: You want to move to Japan instead. 100Mbits up, 100Mbits down DSL, for ~$70 a month. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:13:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds > successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes > to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the messageSendTimeRequest seems to > be tied the amount of data waiting to be transferred so I've tried to tweak the > settings to reduce the amount of data that is going out of my node. Reducing the > number of max connections, reducing the chance of cache, and other little things. > But they don't seem to be able to bring it down. The only thing I can figure is > that my node just looks too good to pass up (I have a really good upstream), and the > other nodes just really like to request from my node and end up overloading me. > So is there anything I can do to reduce the load? Okay, this is wierd. You running stable, I assume? Can you send me the output of your General infolet? http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/performance/general How long has the node been running? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet on Mac OS X 10.3.3
>> Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=128m >> freenet.node.Main >> Done >> iMac:~/freenet paul$ Unrecognized VM option 'MaxDirectMemorySize=128m' >> Could not create the Java virtual machine. >> iMac:~/freenet paul$ >Does it start anyway? The prompt came back Read here for more information on this issue: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/13863 /N - Original Message - From: "Toad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 6:35 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] freenet on Mac OS X 10.3.3 > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet store compromised?? netbus
Toad wrote: On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 12:45:05AM -0500, tripolar wrote: Hello I am running freenet on a linux system. All seemed well until I checked out firestarter ( GUI firewall program). When I noticed requests from my machine 192.168.*.*:12345 to 81.53.*.* . Under service it says "netbus" . Thinking this was not a "good thing" I closed ports on firewall/router which I had forwarded to my linux pc. On the pc firewall ( firestarter ) I also blocked all ports. Shut down freenet. Used netstat to view connections and at that point only my isps mailservers showed up. I opened up ports 23190 & 8481then started freenet. A short time later the hits showed up again- there are 7 at a time over about 3 minutes. Don't open 8481 to the outside world. Bad idea. Thanks should I only have 23190 forwarded to my inside pc then? Prior to this output below- the last group of 7 was at 23:53 time:May 28 00:31:23 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus My /etc/services doesn't list netbus. It's probably just a node running on a wierd port though. time:May 28 00:31:26 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus time:May 28 00:31:32 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus time:May 28 00:31:44 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus time:May 28 00:32:08 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus time:May 28 00:32:56 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus time:May 28 00:34:32 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus Ok any ideas? It is a little late because I removed the freenet directory -I think about 4 gigs worth :-( I would like to reinstall freenet in chroot so I will take any pointers. Also I still have a freenet directory ( maybe 5 gigs) from when I was running windows. Now I am strictly running linux and I wonder if I can transfer any of that over to my new freenet on linux ( when I get it installed )? Thanks P.S.- I will start googling right now " freenet + chroot " ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet store compromised?? netbus
Mika Hirvonen wrote: tripolar wrote: Hello I am running freenet on a linux system. All seemed well until I checked out firestarter ( GUI firewall program). When I noticed requests from my machine 192.168.*.*:12345 to 81.53.*.* . Under service it says "netbus" . Thinking this was not a "good thing" I Ok any ideas? IMHO, this is a false alarm. Netbus is a windows trojan that by default uses port 12345. Your node just randomly chose port 12345 to use as a source port for an outgoing connection. Thanks! why didnt you tell me before I deleted /freenet ;-) Oh well I was thinking of installing freenet in chroot. Might as well investigate the options :-) Thanks ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest
My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the messageSendTimeRequest seems to be tied the amount of data waiting to be transferred so I've tried to tweak the settings to reduce the amount of data that is going out of my node. Reducing the number of max connections, reducing the chance of cache, and other little things. But they don't seem to be able to bring it down. The only thing I can figure is that my node just looks too good to pass up (I have a really good upstream), and the other nodes just really like to request from my node and end up overloading me. So is there anything I can do to reduce the load? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet on Mac OS X 10.3.3
Does it start anyway? On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:12:49AM +, Paul wrote: > Hi. I have successfully run freenet on Mac OS X for some time. > I have downloaded installed the latest > stable, but when I attempt to start freenet, here is the result: > > iMac:~/freenet paul$ sh ./start-freenet.sh > Detected freenet-ext.jar > Detected freenet.jar > Sun java detected. > Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=128m > freenet.node.Main > Done > iMac:~/freenet paul$ Unrecognized VM option 'MaxDirectMemorySize=128m' > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > iMac:~/freenet paul$ > > If it helps, here is the result of: java -version: > > iMac:~/freenet paul$ java -version > java version "1.4.2_03" > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_03-117.1) > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-34, mixed mode) > > Could anyone shed light on the problem? > > Thanks! > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet store compromised?? netbus
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 12:45:05AM -0500, tripolar wrote: > Hello > I am running freenet on a linux system. All seemed well until I checked > out firestarter ( GUI firewall program). > When I noticed requests from my machine 192.168.*.*:12345 to 81.53.*.* . > Under service it says "netbus" . Thinking this was not a "good thing" I > closed ports on firewall/router which I had forwarded to my linux pc. On > the pc firewall ( firestarter ) I also blocked all ports. Shut down > freenet. Used netstat to view connections and at that point only my isps > mailservers showed up. > I opened up ports 23190 & 8481then started freenet. A short time later > the hits showed up again- there are 7 at a time over about 3 minutes. Don't open 8481 to the outside world. Bad idea. > Prior to this output below- the last group of 7 was at 23:53 > time:May 28 00:31:23 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 > dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus My /etc/services doesn't list netbus. It's probably just a node running on a wierd port though. > time:May 28 00:31:26 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 > dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus > time:May 28 00:31:32 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 > dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus > time:May 28 00:31:44 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 > dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus > time:May 28 00:32:08 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 > dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus > time:May 28 00:32:56 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 > dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus > time:May 28 00:34:32 in: out:eth1 port:12345 source:192.168.1.1 > dest:81.53.250.193 len:44 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:netbus > > Ok any ideas? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] freenet on Mac OS X 10.3.3
Hi. I have successfully run freenet on Mac OS X for some time. I have downloaded installed the latest stable, but when I attempt to start freenet, here is the result: iMac:~/freenet paul$ sh ./start-freenet.sh Detected freenet-ext.jar Detected freenet.jar Sun java detected. Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=128m freenet.node.Main Done iMac:~/freenet paul$ Unrecognized VM option 'MaxDirectMemorySize=128m' Could not create the Java virtual machine. iMac:~/freenet paul$ If it helps, here is the result of: java -version: iMac:~/freenet paul$ java -version java version "1.4.2_03" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_03-117.1) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-34, mixed mode) Could anyone shed light on the problem? Thanks! ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on NetBSD 1.6 (old java version)
A 1.4 JVM is an absolute requirement, because we use NIO. Sorry. Kaffe or GCJ might run on NetBSD, however, right now the NIO doesn't work on that either (bugs, being worked on, but can't give you a schedule). On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:23:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi. > > I recently got my broadband connection, and of course I want to run > Freenet, but I ran into some problems. > > Summary: > > I have/run NetBSD 1.6. > > There is a sun-java 1.4 package, but it will only install under > NetBSD-current. > > Freenet doesn't seem to like 1.3.1.10. > > Sun java detected. > 1.3.1_10 > Old version of java detected. > Please install a 1.4.x JVM. > > > So, it seems my options are: > > 1. Upgrade to NetBSD-current (but I really prefer the release versions) > > 2. Wait for NetBSD 2.0 (any time now..) and hope 1.4* will work. > > 3. Try to get 1.4 to install on NetBSD-1.6 (Lots of work, probably) > > ..unless Freenet can run on a 1.3 JVM. Can it? > > The project main webpage says "We have experienced best results with > Sun's Java Runtime Environment (versions 1.4.1 and later)", which would > seem to indicate that "Sun's Java Runtime Environment (versions 1.4.1 and > later)" is not an absolute requirement. But I doubt I'd be *that* > lucky.. > > Any help appreciated. > > > Magnus > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 07:04:39PM -0400, Jay Oliveri wrote: > On Thursday 27 May 2004 09:43 am, Marc Lehmann wrote: > > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:42:37PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I find Java's memory requirements to be totally unreasonable, its > > > performance lackluster, and I've finally come to the conclusion that it > > > was indeed a poor choice of language in which to implement a project of > > > this size and complexity. A native-compiled language would have offered > > > vastly superior speed and, no doubt, significantly lower memory > > > consumption as well. > > > > And most likely vastly improved portability, too, as most native compiled > > languages are far more portable than java (and especially freenet, which > > basically runs on windows, linux/x86 and whatever emulates these only, > > due to it's dependencies on the sun sdk). > > Natively compiled languages more portable than Java? Can you provide > examples? > > Windows is a real problem in this area, as far as writing portable code is > concerned. Since windows only ships with POSIX.1, you'll have to rewrite > everything that uses functions in the later revisions, which includes > pthreads. Even then the API's don't work equally well (for example, > performing a stat() on an already opened file works fine on Linux, but on > Windows returns an error). > > I've found that debugging fcptools on Windows allows me to see more errors, > and therefore has been my choice for testing since Windows doesn't allow as > much freedom as Linux does, for better or worse. > > Choosing Java in this respect eliminates these issues, and puts the > "platform independent" effort squarely on someone else's shoulders, which > in this case is the author of the JVM. Can you name a natively compiled > language that requires no third-party libs which comes close to J2SE? MOST OF those issues. Not all. There are issues with files even in java. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet store compromised?? netbus
tripolar wrote: Hello I am running freenet on a linux system. All seemed well until I checked out firestarter ( GUI firewall program). When I noticed requests from my machine 192.168.*.*:12345 to 81.53.*.* . Under service it says "netbus" . Thinking this was not a "good thing" I Ok any ideas? IMHO, this is a false alarm. Netbus is a windows trojan that by default uses port 12345. Your node just randomly chose port 12345 to use as a source port for an outgoing connection. -- Mika Hirvonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://nightwatch.mine.nu/ ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
