-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Madeline Brubaker wrote:
| Would someone step me through setting up Norton Internet Security
| Professional properly? I'm not entirely sure how to
Do yourself a favor, and don't run that software.
Yes, I'm a Linux nut. My attitude towards Windows
David Masover wrote:
Madeline Brubaker wrote:
| Would someone step me through setting up Norton Internet Security
| Professional properly? I'm not entirely sure how to
Do yourself a favor, and don't run that software.
Yes, I'm a Linux nut. My attitude towards Windows boxes is: almost all
Windows
I'm not a Linux nut, but I agree with this in principal. Just using a
software firewall is totally insecure. Your best bet, if you don't want
to bother setting up a Linux box to act as your go between, [...]
What, a linux/unix box is *not* a software firewall? :)
--
5:45PM up 132 days, 3
On Monday 14 June 2004 08:45 am, David Masover wrote:
Madeline Brubaker wrote:
| Would someone step me through setting up Norton Internet Security
| Professional properly? I'm not entirely sure how to
Do yourself a favor, and don't run that software.
Yes, I'm a Linux nut. My attitude
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not a Linux nut, but I agree with this in principal. Just using a
software firewall is totally insecure. Your best bet, if you don't want
to bother setting up a Linux box to act as your go between, [...]
What, a linux/unix box is *not* a software firewall? :)
Dear
Madeline Brubaker:
Please excuse the nuts around here that seem to be as much of a
problem as Apple lovers once were.
I don't particularly like some of Window's creations, but even though
Linus releases are getting slowly more usable for ordinary people,
they still do not have enough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael R. Stork wrote:
[...]
| a hardware firewall and NAT. I wouldn't connect any PC direct to a
| cable/DSL line.
I would. A linux one. Or better, a BSD one. With daily updates. The
firewall really wouldn't help all that much for me, although I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|I'm not a Linux nut, but I agree with this in principal. Just using a
|software firewall is totally insecure. Your best bet, if you don't want
|to bother setting up a Linux box to act as your go between, [...]
|
|
| What, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicholas Sturm wrote:
| Dear
|
|Madeline Brubaker:
|
|
| Please excuse the nuts around here that seem to be as much of a
| problem as Apple lovers once were.
Ooh! Ooh! I smell a rant!
Please excuse my response to being called a nut.
| I don't
David Masover wrote:
Michael R. Stork wrote:
[...]
| a hardware firewall and NAT. I wouldn't connect any PC direct to a
| cable/DSL line.
I would. A linux one. Or better, a BSD one. With daily updates. The
firewall really wouldn't help all that much for me, although I do use
NAT as an
David Masover wrote:
| What, a linux/unix box is *not* a software firewall? :)
Point taken. But Linux kernel vs Norton userspace? About the third
time I've said so on this list, but I just turn off the _services_ that
I don't use, and people get denied anyway, with no special firewall.
What's
11 matches
Mail list logo