I've got this with the udating freenet lateley!
When i upgrade freenet using the upgrade script, it produces a
24Mb seednodes.ref file, witch i suspect is causing my node of running
out of memory!
I'm running Debian Woody Stable!
Here is what happens!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/freenet$ ./update.sh
cp:
It means you are connected to a node that does not know its address. A
firewalled node might have this problem. Recent stable builds should
reduce the occurrence of this.
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 06:52:23AM -0700, Ben Gass wrote:
> Didn't confirm my subscription before sending the last
> one.
>
>
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:33:38AM +0200, Michael Kuijn wrote:
> On Friday 06 August 2004 21:48, Toad wrote:
> > Does freenet work less well on XP Home than on XP Pro?
> Are you kidding? It's both Windows NT 5.1
BTW it's 6 not 5. :)
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Offici
Hmmm. Go to http://127.0.0.1:/ . What build number is it running? Go
to Advanced mode. Then try again, and show me exactly what it says on
the Route Not Found error page.
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:53:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I keep on getting the error message:
>
> Couldn't Re
This is build 5090? It will say what build it is on the web interface.
What does it say on the route not found error page? Go to advanced mode
on the web interface homepage if needed to get more detail.
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:18:56PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello !
>
> Some time ago
Hello !
Some time ago, freenet worked just fine on my machine. Didn't use it
for over a year or so (and did some software installs etc.), and all of
a sudden I'm stuck with the "Route not Found" Error.
I'm running W2kSp4(Ge) with Internet Connection Sharing, Kerio Firewall
2.1.5 (can't run v4,
I keep on getting the error message:
Couldn't Retrieve Key
Couldn't connect to the network. Are you sure you have configured Freenet correctly?
Also make sure that you are connected to the internet.
Retrying...
And I cant figure out how to get it to work..I was behind a linksys router but
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:33:38AM +0200, Michael Kuijn wrote:
> On Friday 06 August 2004 21:48, Toad wrote:
> > Does freenet work less well on XP Home than on XP Pro?
> Are you kidding? It's both Windows NT 5.1
Sure but it has some deep crippling to make it hard to run servers IIRC.
Is it a probl
Dude, you really think that?
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Kuijn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on XP Home/
> On Friday 06 August 2004 21:48, Toad wrote:
> > Does freenet work less well on
On Friday 06 August 2004 21:48, Toad wrote:
> Does freenet work less well on XP Home than on XP Pro?
Are you kidding? It's both Windows NT 5.1
0x0A
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe
Even this is off-topic. The message you refer to is the only message that
appears twice in the gmane archives. It's your setup; I've never used
NetJunction. Could be those Return Receipts you're sending as well.
On Friday 06 August 2004 02:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why do my messages
The download page says:
"Freenet works best with Windows 2000, XP Professional or NT. Windows
ME, 98 and 95 work less well."
Does freenet work less well on XP Home than on XP Pro?
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - N
Stable build 5090 is now available. The snapshots have been updated.
Please upgrade ASAP, unless you are using the unstable branch. You can
do this on Windows by using the update option on the start menu. On
Linux, OS/X etc, you can update by using the update.sh script (and
restart the node). You c
Why do my messages keep show up as double posts in the archive?
I'm only sending it to the email address for the group only once
One shows up as something like
[freenet-support] Showdown at the Freenode Coral
and the other just as
Showdown at the Freenode Coral
On Friday 06 August 2004 10:16 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The sixth amendment is the right to a public and speedy trial, the right
> to call witnesses, and the right to counsel. The fourth amendment is the
> protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
>
> And I've never suggested we
This discussion is now continuing on the chat mailing list as it is not
really appropriate for support. Please post any further follow-ups
there.
Ian.
On 6 Aug 2004, at 15:29, vinyl1 wrote:
I suggest we not give Mr. Findley a hard time. He is an honorable
guy, and is telling us what the law i
The answer would be no, as far as I can tell. Supposedly there was going to
be another line added into the flaunch.ini that would let you send
parameters to java to startup Freenet with, however there does not seem to
be any at this time. The current workaround is:
1. Start Freenet directly thr
I suggest we not give Mr. Findley a hard time. He is an honorable guy, and is telling
us what the law is, not what a bunch of Unix geeks think it ought to be.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.suppo
Other approach: just increase the -Xmx.
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Hessi James wrote:
> Thanks alot, that worked. Though I've got 1GB of RAM this seemed to be the
> problem!
> I cutted seednodes.ref down to about 10MB.
>
>
> On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:30:16 +0200, Someone <[EMAIL PR
The sixth amendment is the right to a public and speedy trial, the right to call
witnesses, and the right to counsel.
The fourth amendment is the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
And I've never suggested we ditch or add anything. Laws preventing you from
transmitting illeg
Thanks alot, that worked. Though I've got 1GB of RAM this seemed to be the
problem!
I cutted seednodes.ref down to about 10MB.
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:30:16 +0200, Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hessi James schrieb:
Hey there,
I just updated to 5089. However, the node does not finish star
Really? I believe I did. Don't get mad at me if you chose to ignore it.
I gave you a link to the New York state penal code definition of criminal
facilitation. Which spells out very clearly that one only needs a probable knowledge
that his or her actions are allowing for a crime to occur.
htt
22 matches
Mail list logo
