RE: [freenet-support] Showdown at the Freenode Coral

2004-08-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really? I believe I did. Don't get mad at me if you chose to ignore it. I gave you a link to the New York state penal code definition of criminal facilitation. Which spells out very clearly that one only needs a probable knowledge that his or her actions are allowing for a crime to occur.

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Node not finishing start up under W2k

2004-08-06 Thread Hessi James
Thanks alot, that worked. Though I've got 1GB of RAM this seemed to be the problem! I cutted seednodes.ref down to about 10MB. On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:30:16 +0200, Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hessi James schrieb: Hey there, I just updated to 5089. However, the node does not finish

RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2004-08-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The sixth amendment is the right to a public and speedy trial, the right to call witnesses, and the right to counsel. The fourth amendment is the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. And I've never suggested we ditch or add anything. Laws preventing you from transmitting

Re: [freenet-support] Question about the bunny app

2004-08-06 Thread Someone
The answer would be no, as far as I can tell. Supposedly there was going to be another line added into the flaunch.ini that would let you send parameters to java to startup Freenet with, however there does not seem to be any at this time. The current workaround is: 1. Start Freenet directly

[freenet-support] Moved to chat: Showdown at the Freenode Coral

2004-08-06 Thread Ian Clarke
This discussion is now continuing on the chat mailing list as it is not really appropriate for support. Please post any further follow-ups there. Ian. On 6 Aug 2004, at 15:29, vinyl1 wrote: I suggest we not give Mr. Findley a hard time. He is an honorable guy, and is telling us what the law

OT** Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2004-08-06 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Friday 06 August 2004 10:16 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The sixth amendment is the right to a public and speedy trial, the right to call witnesses, and the right to counsel. The fourth amendment is the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. And I've never suggested we

[freenet-support] On topic message

2004-08-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why do my messages keep show up as double posts in the archive? I'm only sending it to the email address for the group only once One shows up as something like [freenet-support] Showdown at the Freenode Coral and the other just as Showdown at the Freenode Coral

[freenet-support] Stable build 5090

2004-08-06 Thread Toad
Stable build 5090 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Please upgrade ASAP, unless you are using the unstable branch. You can do this on Windows by using the update option on the start menu. On Linux, OS/X etc, you can update by using the update.sh script (and restart the node). You

[freenet-support] Freenet on XP Home/

2004-08-06 Thread Toad
The download page says: Freenet works best with Windows 2000, XP Professional or NT. Windows ME, 98 and 95 work less well. Does freenet work less well on XP Home than on XP Pro? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS -

Re: [freenet-support] On topic message

2004-08-06 Thread Jay Oliveri
Even this is off-topic. The message you refer to is the only message that appears twice in the gmane archives. It's your setup; I've never used NetJunction. Could be those Return Receipts you're sending as well. On Friday 06 August 2004 02:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do my messages

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on XP Home/

2004-08-06 Thread Michael Kuijn
On Friday 06 August 2004 21:48, Toad wrote: Does freenet work less well on XP Home than on XP Pro? Are you kidding? It's both Windows NT 5.1 0x0A ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on XP Home/

2004-08-06 Thread Dave
Dude, you really think that? - Original Message - From: Michael Kuijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 11:33 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on XP Home/ On Friday 06 August 2004 21:48, Toad wrote: Does freenet work less well on XP Home

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on XP Home/

2004-08-06 Thread Toad
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:33:38AM +0200, Michael Kuijn wrote: On Friday 06 August 2004 21:48, Toad wrote: Does freenet work less well on XP Home than on XP Pro? Are you kidding? It's both Windows NT 5.1 Sure but it has some deep crippling to make it hard to run servers IIRC. Is it a problem

[freenet-support] (no subject)

2004-08-06 Thread MySTiC8277
I keep on getting the error message: Couldn't Retrieve Key Couldn't connect to the network. Are you sure you have configured Freenet correctly? Also make sure that you are connected to the internet. Retrying... And I cant figure out how to get it to work..I was behind a linksys router but

[freenet-support] Error: Route Not Found

2004-08-06 Thread Arralen
Hello ! Some time ago, freenet worked just fine on my machine. Didn't use it for over a year or so (and did some software installs etc.), and all of a sudden I'm stuck with the Route not Found Error. I'm running W2kSp4(Ge) with Internet Connection Sharing, Kerio Firewall 2.1.5 (can't run v4,

Re: [freenet-support] Error: Route Not Found

2004-08-06 Thread Toad
This is build 5090? It will say what build it is on the web interface. What does it say on the route not found error page? Go to advanced mode on the web interface homepage if needed to get more detail. On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:18:56PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello ! Some time ago,

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2004-08-06 Thread Toad
Hmmm. Go to http://127.0.0.1:/ . What build number is it running? Go to Advanced mode. Then try again, and show me exactly what it says on the Route Not Found error page. On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:53:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I keep on getting the error message: Couldn't

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on XP Home/

2004-08-06 Thread Toad
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:33:38AM +0200, Michael Kuijn wrote: On Friday 06 August 2004 21:48, Toad wrote: Does freenet work less well on XP Home than on XP Pro? Are you kidding? It's both Windows NT 5.1 BTW it's 6 not 5. :) -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official

Re: [freenet-support] no address

2004-08-06 Thread Toad
It means you are connected to a node that does not know its address. A firewalled node might have this problem. Recent stable builds should reduce the occurrence of this. On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 06:52:23AM -0700, Ben Gass wrote: Didn't confirm my subscription before sending the last one.

[freenet-support] update.sh produces a 24Mb seednodes.ref?

2004-08-06 Thread Heine Laursen
I've got this with the udating freenet lateley! When i upgrade freenet using the upgrade script, it produces a 24Mb seednodes.ref file, witch i suspect is causing my node of running out of memory! I'm running Debian Woody Stable! Here is what happens! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/freenet$ ./update.sh cp: