Re: [freenet-support] node on a server, and at home?
Neither client or server has to be ssl aware. Markus From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ahh, okay. As long as it doesn't need the clients to be ssl aware. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5091
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 03:07, Toad wrote: Stable build 5091 is now available. Please upgrade. Woohoo! They did it again. Thanks! -- Michael A. Kuijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\- against microsoft attachments ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] My 5091 is dead (after 7 hours)
(I'm not complaining. I'm just providing info in case anyone wants it.) Windows XP Home 1.8 GHz 384 MB RAM Installed Build 5090 from Start menu, including new seednodes file. Load was 5-10% at first. Frost and Spider have been running for 6 hours. Now 7 hours later load is stable at 1%. Memory usage (pages/second, disk queue length) is low. Open Connections: Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 0 (0/0/132) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 0 (0/0) Data waiting to be transferred None Total amount of data transferredNone Number of requests (sent/received) 0/0 Node Status Info: Uptime: 0 days, 7 hours, 9 minutes Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 2 (1.1%) Pooled threads which are idle: 25 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 10%. Load due to thread limit = 1.1% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (100%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 20% = 100ms / 500ms = overloadLow (100%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(0) = limit (5419007.856 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.9) * outputBandwidthLimit (100352) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 0% because: 3600.0 req/hr * 9.991E-5 (pTransfer) * 293454.0 bytes = 105643 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 15912960 (set input limit) * 60 * 1.1 = 1050255360 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 1.1%. Routing Table (at /nodestatus.html) Number of known routing nodes 263 Number of node references 263 Number of newbie nodes 0 Number of uncontactable nodes 263 Contacted and attempted to contact node references 0 Contacted node references 0 Contacted newbie node references0 Connections with Successful Transfers 0 Backed off nodes0 Connection Attempts 0 Successful Connections 0 Lowest max estimated search time0ms Lowest max estimated DNF time 0ms Lowest global search time estimate 30.0ms Highest global search time estimate 30.0ms Lowest global transfer rate estimate0 bytes/second Highest global transfer rate estimate 0 bytes/second Lowest one hop probability of DNF 0.95 Highest one hop probability of DNF 0.95 Lowest one hop probability of transfer failure 0.95 Highest one hop probability of transfer failure 0.95 Single hop probability of QueryRejected 0.9 Single hop average time for QueryRejected 17720.0 Single hop probability of early timeout 0.9 Single hop average time for early timeout 17720.0 Single hop probability of search timeout0.9 Single hop average time for search timeout 493544.0 Single hop overall probability of DNF given no timeout 0.9 Single hop overall probability of transfer failure given transfer 0.9 Probability of transfer given incoming request 0.1 Total number of requests that didn't QR 0 Total number of reqests that timed out before a QR or Accepted 0 Implementation freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable Freenet.log (62 KB in error logging mode) The first few errors: INFO: Native CPUID library 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/jcpuid-x86-windows.dll' loaded from resource INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library 'net/i2p/util/jbigi-windows-pentium4.dll' loaded from resource Aug 10, 2004 11:18:00 PM (freenet.client.http.FproxyServlet, YThread-30, ERROR): Unexpected Exception in FproxyServlet.doGet -- freenet.KeyException: Byte array does not contain a SVK freenet.KeyException: Byte array does not contain a SVK at freenet.keys.SVK.init(SVK.java:41) at freenet.keys.SVK.init(SVK.java:50) at freenet.client.ClientSVK.init(ClientSVK.java:53) at freenet.client.ClientSSK.init(ClientSSK.java:57) at freenet.client.ClientSSK.createFromRequestURI(ClientSSK.java:44) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at freenet.client.AbstractClientKey.createClientKey (AbstractClientKey.java:49) at freenet.client.AbstractClientKey.createFromRequestURI (AbstractClientKey.java:36) at freenet.client.http.FproxyServlet.doGet(FproxyServlet.java:570) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(Unknown Source) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(Unknown Source) at freenet.interfaces.servlet.ServletContainer.handle(ServletContainer.java:82) at freenet.interfaces.LocalNIOInterface$ConnectionShell.run (LocalNIOInterface.java:268) at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run(YThreadFactory.java:285) Aug 10, 2004 11:19:11 PM (freenet.client.http.FproxyServlet, YThread-28, ERROR): Unexpected Exception in FproxyServlet.doGet -- freenet.KeyException: Byte array does not contain a SVK freenet.KeyException: Byte array does not contain a SVK at freenet.keys.SVK.init(SVK.java:41) at
RE: [freenet-support] My 5091 is dead (after 7 hours)
Any error messages in the log? I recommend that you upgrade your node to a v5091.. Which solves an issue wrt merging a new seednodes file (reseeding). Cheers /N -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Sent: den 11 augusti 2004 13:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] My 5091 is dead (after 7 hours) (I'm not complaining. I'm just providing info in case anyone wants it.) Windows XP Home 1.8 GHz 384 MB RAM Installed Build 5090 from Start menu, including new seednodes file. Load was 5-10% at first. Frost and Spider have been running for 6 hours. Now 7 hours later load is stable at 1%. Memory usage (pages/second, disk queue length) is low. Open Connections: Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 0 (0/0/132) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 0 (0/0) Data waiting to be transferredNone Total amount of data transferred None Number of requests (sent/received)0/0 Node Status Info: Uptime: 0 days, 7 hours, 9 minutes Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 2 (1.1%) Pooled threads which are idle: 25 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 10%. Load due to thread limit = 1.1% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (100%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 20% = 100ms / 500ms = overloadLow (100%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(0) = limit (5419007.856 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.9) * outputBandwidthLimit (100352) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 0% because: 3600.0 req/hr * 9.991E-5 (pTransfer) * 293454.0 bytes = 105643 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 15912960 (set input limit) * 60 * 1.1 = 1050255360 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 1.1%. Routing Table (at /nodestatus.html) Number of known routing nodes 263 Number of node references 263 Number of newbie nodes0 Number of uncontactable nodes 263 Contacted and attempted to contact node references0 Contacted node references 0 Contacted newbie node references 0 Connections with Successful Transfers 0 Backed off nodes 0 Connection Attempts 0 Successful Connections0 Lowest max estimated search time 0ms Lowest max estimated DNF time 0ms Lowest global search time estimate30.0ms Highest global search time estimate 30.0ms Lowest global transfer rate estimate 0 bytes/second Highest global transfer rate estimate 0 bytes/second Lowest one hop probability of DNF 0.95 Highest one hop probability of DNF0.95 Lowest one hop probability of transfer failure0.95 Highest one hop probability of transfer failure 0.95 Single hop probability of QueryRejected 0.9 Single hop average time for QueryRejected 17720.0 Single hop probability of early timeout 0.9 Single hop average time for early timeout 17720.0 Single hop probability of search timeout 0.9 Single hop average time for search timeout493544.0 Single hop overall probability of DNF given no timeout0.9 Single hop overall probability of transfer failure given transfer 0.9 Probability of transfer given incoming request0.1 Total number of requests that didn't QR 0 Total number of reqests that timed out before a QR or Accepted 0 Implementationfreenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable Freenet.log (62 KB in error logging mode) The first few errors: INFO: Native CPUID library 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/jcpuid-x86-windows.dll' loaded from resource INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library 'net/i2p/util/jbigi-windows-pentium4.dll' loaded from resource Aug 10, 2004 11:18:00 PM (freenet.client.http.FproxyServlet, YThread-30, ERROR): Unexpected Exception in FproxyServlet.doGet -- freenet.KeyException: Byte array does not contain a SVK freenet.KeyException: Byte array does not contain a SVK at freenet.keys.SVK.init(SVK.java:41) at freenet.keys.SVK.init(SVK.java:50) at freenet.client.ClientSVK.init(ClientSVK.java:53) at freenet.client.ClientSSK.init(ClientSSK.java:57) at freenet.client.ClientSSK.createFromRequestURI(ClientSSK.java:44) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at freenet.client.AbstractClientKey.createClientKey (AbstractClientKey.java:49) at freenet.client.AbstractClientKey.createFromRequestURI (AbstractClientKey.java:36) at freenet.client.http.FproxyServlet.doGet(FproxyServlet.java:570) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(Unknown Source) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(Unknown Source) at
Re: [freenet-support] datastore size
Debatable point... On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:13:08AM +0200, Martin Scheffler wrote: Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 00:55 schrieb Michael Kuijn: On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote: Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big? Not really, but enlarging your datastore all the time will prevent specialisation. This isn't real bad, but specialisation improves routing. If I were you I would let it specialise at one point. Sorry, but forget that. In Freenet there is no thing like a one peak specialisation for more than one minute. And when the network can hold more data, it increases the lifetime of seldom requested keys. Specialization changes over time, anyway. The only drawback may be that your ubernode becomes popular over time because of more successful replies :-) (much connections increase request ability aswell) Routing does not get better when your node has to purge old keys on new requests - maybe they are requested just one minute later - more net load :-( good byte ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] The Windows Installer
Reason for email: I just installed Freenet on a Windows machine. This wasn't an update, this was a fresh install. I told the Windows installer to not create shortcuts, but it did. This is strange, because it hasn't done this before. I went through step-by-step, and when I got to the place where I could check Do Not Create Shortcuts I checked it. Yet, I get a Freenet icon on the desktop, a Freenet program group entry in the Start Menu, and a Freenet shortcut in the Startup folder. This was for 5090. When I updated to 5091 I told it again to not create shortcuts and, again, it did. Outstanding Issues: On another note, whether or not Freenet starts up when Windows starts should be separate from whether or not to create shortcuts. They're logically different (especially for those who don't know how a user sets a program to startup automatically) and the choice has been separated in every other Windows installer I've ever seen, making it the expected behavior. On yet another note, can't we have a separate build updater? Separate from the installer, I mean. It doesn't make sense to answer where I want the installation to go on the filesystem, and whether or not to create shortcuts, when I'm updating an existing installation. update.bat? -todd ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] The Windows Installer
Quoting myself: On yet another note, can't we have a separate build updater? Separate from the installer, I mean. It doesn't make sense to answer where I want the installation to go on the filesystem, and whether or not to create shortcuts, when I'm updating an existing installation. update.bat? Egads. I apologize. How long has that UpdateSnapshot.exe been there? *g* -todd ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Freenet on FreeBSD
I'm working on setting up a freenet node on a machine running FreeBSD 4.6. The java vm that is already installed (and is the most current version) is a java 1.3 vm. Sun does not release a vm for the BSDs. At the moment I'm planing on compiling the jdk from the source provided by sun with the freebsd patches (www.freebsd.org/java). Any advice? Will freenet work with the freebsd patched version? ~Paul ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on FreeBSD
Paul wrote: I'm working on setting up a freenet node on a machine running FreeBSD 4.6. The java vm that is already installed (and is the most current version) is a java 1.3 vm. Sun does not release a vm for the BSDs. At You really need at last the (possibly latest) 1.4 jvm, sorry. Me, I use the 1.4.2 linux version on NetBSD, and it works very well. -- /~\ The ASCIITLD \ / Ribbon Campaign They that can give up essential liberty to obtain X Against HTMLa little temporary safety deserve neither liberty / \ Email! nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on FreeBSD
The binary on the server at the moment is a 1.3 vm. To get the 1.4 vm working you have to download the source and some binaries from sun's site, apply a patch from the bsd team, and then compile it. (all because of sun's lisense) Sounds simple enough execpt compiling it requires a java vm. ~Paul On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:05:33 +0200, TLD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul wrote: I'm working on setting up a freenet node on a machine running FreeBSD 4.6. The java vm that is already installed (and is the most current version) is a java 1.3 vm. Sun does not release a vm for the BSDs. At You really need at last the (possibly latest) 1.4 jvm, sorry. Me, I use the 1.4.2 linux version on NetBSD, and it works very well. -- /~\ The ASCIITLD \ / Ribbon Campaign They that can give up essential liberty to obtain X Against HTMLa little temporary safety deserve neither liberty / \ Email! nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Newbie : is my installation good ?
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 04:39:04PM +0200, lflesch.domicile wrote: I'm actually making a tree with freenet. Installed freenet build 5090 on XP pro + frost. I have configured my node as permanent node and have made a reseed with the seednode found on freenet homepage. Everything seems working yet : - After 3 days o connection, I have only maxi 30 reference node connected. Is it normal. What is a typical number ? No. It should be higher than that. See http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/networking/ocm Near the top it should say something like: Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 82 (30/52/200) Show me - are there any inbound connections? - Browsing a freesite is very hard. In fact, I succeeded only once opening one of the site proposed. Is it normal ? No. Well, mostly no. :). Consequence of the above. I hope all your advices to help me diagnose and tune my installation. Thanks ! -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] The Windows Installer
It's a recent addition. The question is, is it included by the installer? Further, should it be included in the Distribution Servlet? On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 08:07:43AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting myself: On yet another note, can't we have a separate build updater? Separate from the installer, I mean. It doesn't make sense to answer where I want the installation to go on the filesystem, and whether or not to create shortcuts, when I'm updating an existing installation. update.bat? Egads. I apologize. How long has that UpdateSnapshot.exe been there? *g* -todd -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]