Quoting Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stable build 5099 is now available widely.
Do we have to do the wait-for-larger-network-to-get-new-seednodes thing, as was
stated with 5097 and 5098?
-todd
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello. When trying to insert a NIM I get this
error. I'm running 5099 on Slackware 10 (Linux 2.4.26),
Java 1.4.2_04-b05:
The Insert Request failed.
Reason: Request failed gracefully: freenet.client.WrongStateException: Wrong
state: FAILED should be DONE: after waiting for next process
I
20:18:47Got a TWCM that was not finished!:
freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:true:false for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ d4cf7f176cb38016:
d4cf7f176cb38016/4926c6d20ff8833c: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
id=12634, written=258612, closed=true, writingPacket=true, ready=false,
"given win98se and being forced to run with only
64mb ram on a p233what would you recommend?"
Not running a node?
Well, I think the 1.5 jmv is less heavy on HD and
RAM then the 1.4.2. So, if you really want to go through with it, you either
keep the 1.4.1 or go to the 1.5 JVM, that's my
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:20:40 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the seednodes, so upgrading should be relatively uneventful. You may be
able to use the update utility on Windows, or update.sh on Linux. If
this does not work, for example if your node connects to zero nodes
after startup, download
Yes, this is why you are supposed to update while the node is switched
off. ;)
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:11:23AM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:20:40 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the seednodes, so upgrading should be relatively uneventful. You may be
able to use
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 12:00:19AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stable build 5099 is now available widely.
Do we have to do the wait-for-larger-network-to-get-new-seednodes thing, as was
stated with 5097 and 5098?
Read the rest of the email! We have 64
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 11:46:15PM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
Toad schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 08:28:58PM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
Hi,
there is an important need to bind the external port to a specific
IP-address, for some anonymity reasons:
I have some virtual IP-adresses
I have been unable to d/l 5099. I have tried three times from the snapshot
update and all three times it has failed.Help.
--- Robert Greenage
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- EarthLink: It's your Internet.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do you mean by failed?
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 06:27:32PM +, Robert Greenage wrote:
I have been unable to d/l 5099. I have tried three times from the snapshot
update and all three times it has failed.Help.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey -
The d/l aborted without finishing.
[Original Message]
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10/27/04 1:18:12 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] 5099
What do you mean by failed?
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 06:27:32PM +, Robert Greenage wrote:
I have
11 matches
Mail list logo