mpossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050919/c69ffb75/attachment.pgp>
tp://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050919/16ff1de9/attachment.pgp>
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
>My understanding is that the french crypto regulations were abandoned
>some time ago.
>
>
That law is just a project (no decree yet). For the moment, we're still
limited to 128b.
>Make your own darknet. :)
>Then come to Bristol, take me out for a pizza, and I'll
was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1798 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050919/de0ed82d/attachment.bin>
-- next part --
-
I know that you probably hate people asking the same questions over and over
again, i have
been reading these discussions and explanations for quite some time, but can't
find an
answers to the questions that interests me.
Let's say I trust John and Jill. I create my own litte darknet to
Hello
I am a new user to freenet, and it seems like I followed all the
directions, but I can't get on freenet.
Here's some info:
Version Information
Node Version0.5
Protocol Version1.46
Build Number5012
CVS Revision1.90.2.50.2.38
Uptime
1 day 4 hours
dns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050919/751a4812/attachment.pgp>
org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050919/ecbe746d/attachment.pgp>
enet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https:/
tinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
In <20050919160711.GB19713 at amphibian.dyndns.org> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:47:54AM -0700, dukemorbid1 at hushmail.com wrote:
>> I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical
>> expert
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
In <20050919155428.GD18971 at amphibian.dyndns.org> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 07:52:44PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
>>
>> >On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Julien
Jim Q. writes:
> Hi,
> I had problem installing Freenet because it will fail to download software
> during installation. Matthew helped me with that so I copied some of the
> software it was having difficulty with in the installation directory but now
> at the end of the installation I get
Jim Q. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I had problem installing Freenet because it will fail to download software
during installation. Matthew helped me with that so I copied some of the
software it was having difficulty with in the installation directory but now
at the end of the
No. 0.7 is a major change. The fundamentals will be similar but there
are some significant changes:
- We no longer create one connection for every request. We multiplex.
This is what the identifiers are for.
- Requests do not necessarily start immediately. They can be queued by
the node. If
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 08:55:01PM +, Bob wrote:
Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--snip--
No, there will be an opennet. It will probably operate on similar
principles to the current 0.5 network, but will be 0.7.
We could have a rotating public nodes system like we
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 10:28:49PM -0400, John Meeks wrote:
It seems to me that finding people to communicate with (trust) is the hard
part, and actually communicating with them is the easy part. The opennet
allows you to not have to trust people, since everything is anonymous, and
thus
Well... yeah. :| You can keep using 0.5. And there will be a TCP
transport plugin, eventually, but probably not before 0.7.0.
However in your case I rather suspect freenet 0.7.0 would just work,
even with UDP. UDP port forwarding should not normally be necessary. If
you know the IP of the other
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 07:52:44PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
As far as the above goes, please read the responses to the other post.
I did. So you confirm my understanding ? 99% of current
I had been using Freenet for about a week without an
issue. After having to restart, Freenet would just
keep trying to connect forever without success.
I have tried re-installing to no avail.
I have double checked my Firewall settings with the
Port in the Freenet.ini file.
I can't see any
I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical
expert found it fascinating. Some questions arise that might
concern other non-technical users of Freenet too.
1. I don't know (i.e. can't identify) any other Freenet users. How
will I be able to find a set of peers?
2. Does
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:01:35AM -0700, Jake Speed wrote:
I had been using Freenet for about a week without an
issue. After having to restart, Freenet would just
keep trying to connect forever without success.
Trying to connect? What do you mean? Do you have any connections (web
interface -
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:47:54AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical
expert found it fascinating. Some questions arise that might
concern other non-technical users of Freenet too.
1. I don't know (i.e. can't identify) any other
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
My understanding is that the french crypto regulations were abandoned
some time ago.
That law is just a project (no decree yet). For the moment, we're still
limited to 128b.
Make your own darknet. :)
Then come to Bristol, take me out for a pizza, and I'll connect
I know that you probably hate people asking the same questions over and over again, i have
been reading these discussions and explanations for quite some time, but can't find an
answers to the questions that interests me.
Let's say I trust John and Jill. I create my own litte darknet to
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 06:55:38PM +0100, Volodya Mozhenkov wrote:
I know that you probably hate people asking the same questions over and
over again, i have been reading these discussions and explanations for
quite some time, but can't find an answers to the questions that interests
me.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 07:37:27PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
My understanding is that the french crypto regulations were abandoned
some time ago.
That law is just a project (no decree yet). For the moment, we're still
limited to 128b.
That's bizarre. Nobody
Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:01:35AM -0700, Jake Speed wrote:
I had been using Freenet for about a week without an
issue. After having to restart, Freenet would just
keep trying to connect forever without success.
Trying to connect? What do you
Hello
I am a new user to freenet, and it seems like I followed all the
directions, but I can't get on freenet.
Here's some info:
Version Information
Node Version0.5
Protocol Version1.46
Build Number5012
CVS Revision1.90.2.50.2.38
On 9/19/05, Bruce Hollihan [c] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I am a new user to freenet, and it seems like I followed all the
directions, but I can't get on freenet.
Here's some info:
Version Information
Node Version0.5
Protocol Version1.46
Build Number5012
Ouch. This
Thanks for the heads up
I ended up trashing that ancient version of freenet, and went for the
latest release instead.
I've started it up, and already things seem to be closer to a desired
outcome, so I'll be patient.
Also, I received this message, as seen below this line. Should I be
concerned
32 matches
Mail list logo
