[freenet-support] OSX builds of freenet
Thanks to those who tried to help me get a pathetic old Celeron 400 optimized to run freenet acceptably well. I caved and spent the time to build freenet for OSX (With native jbigi libaries!!!) using the current stable source. I knew just enough programming to make the few code changes to support loading the jbigi library for OSX and managed to compile jbigi.jnilib using the I2P source and insert it into the freenet.ext.jar file. Then I stuck that into the freenet source directory so that I could then compile freenet using ant. That may be nothing to the the developers that hang about here, but I'm damn pleased ;-)
[freenet-support] Need a little help plz ...
I seem to have Freenet working ok, but for some reason I am getting far to many error messages. To date, I have been very lucky to get to a site's main page, but never any further than that. Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong. Thanks Here are some of the error messages ... Couldn't retrieve key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Exhale/7//exhale.html Hops To Live: 23 Error: Route Not Found Attempts were made to contact 4 nodes. * 0 were totally unreachable. * 0 restarted. * 4 cleanly rejected. * 0 backed off. Couldn't retrieve key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/CICFI// Hops To Live: 15 Error: Data Not Found [EMAIL PROTECTED],QZvYaKsdFJxfCjq~FiC5XA/CICFI//activelink.png Request started at Thu Sep 29 02:12:58 BST 2005 and failed after 77 seconds Transfered 150 bytes of metadata Failed to follow a DateRedirect to '[EMAIL PROTECTED],QZvYaKsdFJxfCjq~FiC5XA/CICFI' RouteNotFound, reason: No route found I am running a Wndows XP + Firefox system, below is the information from Freenet itself ... Node Version0.5 Protocol VersionSTABLE-1.51 Build Number5105 CVS Revision1.90.2.50.2.134 Uptime 34 minutes Load Current routingTime 0ms Current messageSendTimeRequest 5643ms Pooled threads running jobs 89 (74.2%) Pooled threads which are idle 15 Reason for refusing connections: avgMessageSendTimeRequest(5643.280) > successfulSendTimeCutoff(1000.000) It's normal for the node to sometimes reject connections or requests for a limited period. If you're seeing rejections continuously the node is overloaded or something is wrong (i.e. a bug). Current estimated load for QueryReject purposes 75% Current estimated load for rate limiting 1,128.7% [Rejecting incoming connections and requests!] Reason for load:Load due to thread limit = 74.2% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (100%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 1,128.7% = 5643ms / 500ms > overloadLow (100%) Load due to expected inbound transfers: 15.2% because: 36738.65620474868 req/hr * 0.003562545888037 (pTransfer) * 104871.0 bytes = 13725846 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 1368705 (max observed bytes per minute) * 60 * 1.1 = 90334530 bytes/hr target Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to load): 0.0 Current estimated requests per hour:22816.291614250673 Current global quota (requests per hour): 21397.611919877607 Highest seen bytes downloaded in one minute:1368705 Current outgoing request rate 36738.65620474868 Current probability of a request succeeding by routing 0.5% Current probability of an inbound request causing a transfer outwards 0.7% Current target (best case single node) probability of a request succeeding 1.8% Open Connections Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 48 (22/26/200) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 45 (20/25) Data waiting to be transmitted/received 12 KiB/None Amount of data transmitted/received over currently open connections 17 MiB/22 MiB Total amount of data transmitted/received 24 MiB/25 MiB Number of distinct nodes connected 48 Outbound connections legend Inbound connections legend IdleIdle Transmitting data Transmitting data Receiving data Receiving data Receiving and transmitting data Receiving and transmitting data Messages transferred TypeSent/Received Accepted13212/18831 DataInsert 65/59 DataNotFound5912/4919 DataReply 128/105 DataRequest 21419/14809 InsertReply 10/10 InsertRequest 145/87 NodeAnnouncement5/5 QueryAborted8/16 QueryRejected 8098/15238 QueryRestarted 26684/12922 StoreData 93/77 _ The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop search! http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/ ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Disk Thrashing issues
Squished Squirrel writes: > S ...> writes: > > > I would venture to say that increasing VM is more likely to increase > > disk access, not decrease it. -Xmx does seem to be what you want, > > though; it will set a ceiling on the amount of RAM that Java will > > allocate. > > > > Try disabling Virtual Memory in Windows altogether, and see if that > > helps any with the disk thrashing. Hmm, that sounds a bit crazy .. although the windows VM does suck so who knows :) > You should be able to run Windows > > plus Freenet reasonably well in 640 megs, especially if you kill off any > > tray utilities and unnecessary services. Check the task manager to see > > how much RAM Windows wants for itself, then use -Xmx (or FLaunch.ini) > to > > give Java most of whatever's left. > > > > s > > In my haste to post, I said "VM to 192..." I meant JavaMem. Looking at > the task manager, I'm not seeing any paging per se, so I don't think > that is it. It seems to be a periodic task that freenet itself is performing. Hmm. Tried useDSIndex=false? I don't know if that's particularly significant though. You could also try doLowLevelOutputLimiting=false / doLowLevelInputLimiting=false if you make sure doCPULoad=true and you have an outputBandwidthLimit set, that's more of a CPU thing but it seems to reduce load on my node. Other than that give Java a lot of memory via the control panel->Java -Xmx method and also set -Xms reasonably high to reduce fragmentation / management overhead. If you don't run Frost or other Java apps on the same machine you could make -Xms the same as -Xmx. Or install one JRE just for freenet and one for other apps and set the flags per instance. > It might go away if I dropped a drive in that had a decent cache. > This is a 5 year old 30GB maxtor drive, and I doubt it has much of a > cache on the drive itself. I think I really need to dig up another box > with a wee bit more modern CPU and drive. That would probably help. You might even consider EVM to split your DS across multiple SATA / SCSI drives :) This is suprisingly easy in Linux, I have no idea how to do it in windows (possibly you would need 2003 server or something.) Bob
[freenet-support] OSX builds of freenet
Thanks to those who tried to help me get a pathetic old Celeron 400 optimized to run freenet acceptably well. I caved and spent the time to build freenet for OSX (With native jbigi libaries!!!) using the current stable source. I knew just enough programming to make the few code changes to support loading the jbigi library for OSX and managed to compile jbigi.jnilib using the I2P source and insert it into the freenet.ext.jar file. Then I stuck that into the freenet source directory so that I could then compile freenet using ant. That may be nothing to the the developers that hang about here, but I'm damn pleased ;-) ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Disk Thrashing issues
Squished Squirrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > S ...> writes: > > > I would venture to say that increasing VM is more likely to increase > > disk access, not decrease it. -Xmx does seem to be what you want, > > though; it will set a ceiling on the amount of RAM that Java will > > allocate. > > > > Try disabling Virtual Memory in Windows altogether, and see if that > > helps any with the disk thrashing. Hmm, that sounds a bit crazy .. although the windows VM does suck so who knows :) > You should be able to run Windows > > plus Freenet reasonably well in 640 megs, especially if you kill off any > > tray utilities and unnecessary services. Check the task manager to see > > how much RAM Windows wants for itself, then use -Xmx (or FLaunch.ini) > to > > give Java most of whatever's left. > > > > s > > In my haste to post, I said "VM to 192..." I meant JavaMem. Looking at > the task manager, I'm not seeing any paging per se, so I don't think > that is it. It seems to be a periodic task that freenet itself is performing. Hmm. Tried useDSIndex=false? I don't know if that's particularly significant though. You could also try doLowLevelOutputLimiting=false / doLowLevelInputLimiting=false if you make sure doCPULoad=true and you have an outputBandwidthLimit set, that's more of a CPU thing but it seems to reduce load on my node. Other than that give Java a lot of memory via the control panel->Java -Xmx method and also set -Xms reasonably high to reduce fragmentation / management overhead. If you don't run Frost or other Java apps on the same machine you could make -Xms the same as -Xmx. Or install one JRE just for freenet and one for other apps and set the flags per instance. > It might go away if I dropped a drive in that had a decent cache. > This is a 5 year old 30GB maxtor drive, and I doubt it has much of a > cache on the drive itself. I think I really need to dig up another box > with a wee bit more modern CPU and drive. That would probably help. You might even consider EVM to split your DS across multiple SATA / SCSI drives :) This is suprisingly easy in Linux, I have no idea how to do it in windows (possibly you would need 2003 server or something.) Bob ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] 'Please close() me manually in finalizer' exception
Hello wonderful freenet devs/support lurkers. This is the 2nd time this has happened, my node has become slow due to a lot of errors (10 - 15) in a row like this: 12:55:33 Please close() me manually in finalizer: Key: c923f1d6d077020e8b8f28b43e66389e4377a390140302 Buffer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0x1 : c923f1d6d077020e8b8f28b43e66389e4377a390140302:temp:1050081:4b8baf426b65d4ce New: true ( 0 of 1049900 read) (all with different keys) then a little later a bunch of: Failed to send (4) [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (DSA(60ec 5e98 c29f f58d ac69 4b9b ec62 ee57 fc57 ab97),tcp/67.171.74.121:25035, sessions=1, presentations=3, ID=DSA(60ec 5e98 c29f f58d ac69 4b9b ec62 ee57 fc57 ab97), version=Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.51,5105): outbound attempts=2:15/17: id=46433, keyOffset=11454, length=138, cb=freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:false:false: freenet.SendFailedException: Against peer DSA(60ec 5e98 c29f f58d ac69 4b9b ec62 ee57 fc57 ab97) @ null - Message timed out on queue (nonterminal) Last time I deleted my store and my routing tables, got a new seednodes and restarted. Is there any way to get rid of this without destroying my node? Thanks, Daniel Tallentire ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Web install does not work
#-Martin-# wrote: > I cannot get Freenet, because the web installer does not work. I have > tried it many times now, and it aborts. I tried downloading files from > here: http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/, but perhaps they were the > wrong ones, or not all of the right ones. The webinstall says i have > updated files, and would I like to use them? but when I say yes, it > says it cannot write to the disk. > I'm using XP, modem connection > Is there a zip file somewhere with all of Freenet in it, that I could > just download?why do you use this webinstaller??? I see other people > here have had the same problem. I could download a package here: > http://www.vrhome.com/freenet/, but I don't see anywhere on the main > freenet site telling which is the current version of freenet, and I > don't want to get an old one. Please help. > > Thanks, > > Martin > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=978&package_id=973&release_id=358694 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Disk Thrashing issues
S writes: > I would venture to say that increasing VM is more likely to increase > disk access, not decrease it. -Xmx does seem to be what you want, > though; it will set a ceiling on the amount of RAM that Java will > allocate. > > Try disabling Virtual Memory in Windows altogether, and see if that > helps any with the disk thrashing. You should be able to run Windows > plus Freenet reasonably well in 640 megs, especially if you kill off any > tray utilities and unnecessary services. Check the task manager to see > how much RAM Windows wants for itself, then use -Xmx (or FLaunch.ini) to > give Java most of whatever's left. > > s In my haste to post, I said "VM to 192..." I meant JavaMem. Looking at the task manager, I'm not seeing any paging per se, so I don't think that is it. It seems to be a periodic task that freenet itself is performing. It might go away if I dropped a drive in that had a decent cache. This is a 5 year old 30GB maxtor drive, and I doubt it has much of a cache on the drive itself. I think I really need to dig up another box with a wee bit more modern CPU and drive. OK, I'm really beginning to hate all the limitations on the web version of the gmane support page. Time to get on the list. Pathetic thing can't even linewrap. Squirrel
