On 6/20/06, patou22 wrote:
> I didn't make a list. I won't go and make a list.
> So, i didn't remove registry key. For the moment freenet is desactivate.
Remember to tell us if it actually fixed your problem to disable it.
And we'd like to know how much RAM you have it fixed the problem.
>
>
I didn't make a list. I won't go and make a list.
So, i didn't remove registry key. For the moment freenet is desactivate.
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 04:37:05PM +0200, patou22 wrote:
>
>> Lars Juel Nielsen a ?crit :
>>
>>> On 6/20/06, patou22 wrote:
>>>
On 6/20/06, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Fine, can somebody else have a look?
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:39:20PM +0200, patou22 wrote:
> > I didn't make a list. I won't go and make a list.
> > So, i didn't remove registry key. For the moment freenet is desactivate.
> >
> > Matthew Toseland a
Couldn't we have the node immediately check for the revocation key
when it finds a new update and wait for the revocation key check to
return before displaying the update button? Admittedly there would be
a tiny chance that the key could be blown in between when the
revocation was checked for and
t.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060620/331d4586/attachment.pgp>
A
> >mknqOkjPuqH/7ljwZqaZavw=
> >=vuHW
> >-END PGP SIGNATURE-
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesid=0t=57;> border="0" alt="Get Firefox!" title="Get Firefox!"
> src="http://sfx-images.mozilla.org/affiliates/Buttons/180x60/blank.gif"/>
--
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060620/2416b20f/attachment.pgp>
Lars Juel Nielsen a ?crit :
> On 6/20/06, patou22 wrote:
>> But,
>> Freenet has several registry key!!
>> remove the service and delete the directory 'll not be a clean
>> uninstalation
>
> It does? Which?
>
Search for "freenet" in the registry and you'll find a lot of key. I can
't say how
On 6/20/06, patou22 wrote:
> But,
> Freenet has several registry key!!
> remove the service and delete the directory 'll not be a clean uninstalation
It does? Which?
>
> Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> > I'm sorry to hear that. You have to remove the service and then delete
> > the directory.
> >
But,
Freenet has several registry key!!
remove the service and delete the directory 'll not be a clean uninstalation
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> I'm sorry to hear that. You have to remove the service and then delete
> the directory.
>
> Is your computer very short on RAM? Freenet 0.7 shouldn't
Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060620/390fff46/attachment.pgp>
pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060620/e6e456c5/attachment.pgp>
Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060620/70294cf8/attachment.pgp>
on/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060620/1c61643c/attachment.pgp>
fficial Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetp
Jan Johansson a ?crit :
> Dear members of this list, I have a important question: Since freenet
> 0.7 darknet installer (for windows), does not come with an
> uninstaller, how to uninstall it totally so there is no trace of it on
> my pc? Its causing freezing of my pc, for minutes of time.
>
I'm trying to install freenet on slackware, and I must say it's been
quite annoying so far...I had everything in a freenet folder in my
home directory, but had to copy half the files right into my home
directory anyways because it couldn't find them otherwise...but
anyways, here's my current
Windows 98 has some problems... but these should be less on 0.7, and I
don't know what the problem is in this instance.
Are you trying to run Freenet 0.7 or Freenet 0.5? Did the installer
create a directory with some jar files and so on in it?
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 03:09:00PM +0200, Florian
I'm sorry to hear that. You have to remove the service and then delete
the directory.
Is your computer very short on RAM? Freenet 0.7 shouldn't cause freezing
of your PC, though it's conceivable that it might push it over the edge
if it hasn't got enough RAM; how much RAM does your PC have? Hint:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 08:13:44PM -0400, Joel Salomon wrote:
How is auto-updating supposed to work? I have auto-update
notification enabled, updating disabled; should I be able to click
update on the local node web-page and have the node update? (It
claims to be doing so...)
Yes, but it
Strange... Can you try downloading it again and trying again? Oh and
does the path you are trying to install it into contain any foreign
characters?
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:50:30AM -0600, karl steenblik wrote:
I get 2 errors.
#1
BUILD FAILED
/tmp/antinstall/build.xml:36: Error while
Firstly, don't run freenet as root. :)
Secondly, which version of start-freenet.sh are you running? Can you
send me it?
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:05:18PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to install freenet on slackware, and I must say it's been
quite annoying so far...I had
But,
Freenet has several registry key!!
remove the service and delete the directory 'll not be a clean uninstalation
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
I'm sorry to hear that. You have to remove the service and then delete
the directory.
Is your computer very short on RAM? Freenet 0.7 shouldn't cause
On 6/20/06, patou22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But,
Freenet has several registry key!!
remove the service and delete the directory 'll not be a clean uninstalation
It does? Which?
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
I'm sorry to hear that. You have to remove the service and then delete
the
Lars Juel Nielsen a écrit :
On 6/20/06, patou22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But,
Freenet has several registry key!!
remove the service and delete the directory 'll not be a clean
uninstalation
It does? Which?
Search for freenet in the registry and you'll find a lot of key. I can
't say how
So you're trying to run freenet 0.5?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 10:39:31AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run everything as root. The slackware setup never made me make
another account...so I didn't. lol.
The start-freenet.sh is attached, and should that fail for some
reason, it's also
I didn't make a list. I won't go and make a list.
So, i didn't remove registry key. For the moment freenet is desactivate.
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 04:37:05PM +0200, patou22 wrote:
Lars Juel Nielsen a écrit :
On 6/20/06, patou22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fine, can somebody else have a look?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:39:20PM +0200, patou22 wrote:
I didn't make a list. I won't go and make a list.
So, i didn't remove registry key. For the moment freenet is desactivate.
Matthew Toseland a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 04:37:05PM +0200,
On 6/20/06, patou22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't make a list. I won't go and make a list.
So, i didn't remove registry key. For the moment freenet is desactivate.
Remember to tell us if it actually fixed your problem to disable it.
And we'd like to know how much RAM you have it fixed the
Couldn't we have the node immediately check for the revocation key
when it finds a new update and wait for the revocation key check to
return before displaying the update button? Admittedly there would be
a tiny chance that the key could be blown in between when the
revocation was checked for
On 6/20/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fine, can somebody else have a look?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:39:20PM +0200, patou22 wrote:
I didn't make a list. I won't go and make a list.
So, i didn't remove registry key. For the moment freenet is desactivate.
Matthew Toseland a
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 05:37:17PM -0400, Juiceman wrote:
Couldn't we have the node immediately check for the revocation key
when it finds a new update and wait for the revocation key check to
return before displaying the update button? Admittedly there would be
a tiny chance that the key
Hi,
I encountered, that after update to build 825 the Web
Interface of the FProxy is much thinner than before,
I am missing lots of options I could set before, for
example the setting of the IP, which will be displayed within the
Your own ref text.
Further there arent statistics
Indeed there is. The advanced darknet option, which should be
available through config. In freenet.ini it is
node.advancedDarknetEnabled i think.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:03:52AM +0200, Elmar wrote:
Hi,
I encountered, that after update to build 825 the Web Interface of the
FProxy is
33 matches
Mail list logo
