[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland wrote: >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg" >Content-Disposition: inline > > >--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ? > >That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly >not before 1.0. > >0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer >updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g. >simulations. > >Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every >few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase. Ok, I should rephrase "until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is activated" >On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: >>=20 >> I agree. I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable >> enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is >> activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5 >--=20 >Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org >Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ >ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > >--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg >Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" >Content-Description: Digital signature >Content-Disposition: inline > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQFEy4ygOHFIJVywduQRAk5mAKCKvmAG7uJMyLy5nBFc8LFXH9I8SwCfWHRu >E4+zIwH4Bzwg9qp34vun8xU= >=J7A9 >-END PGP SIGNATURE- > >--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg-- > >___ >Support mailing list >Support at freenetproject.org >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] New installation on dedicated server
I'm back after a break. Now i see only java-autoinstall packages to download. And the linux variants seem to be strictly X11 dependend. So i cannot install them on dedicated non-gui'ed linux rooties. Is there a way to get a non X11 dependend installation package, like before? Greets Manuel
[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! > >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" > >Content-Disposition: inline > > personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more > compatible It's more standards compliant. > > > >You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to > >several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content > >reset. > > This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and > re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible. Yes. > > On a related note... > > If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am > I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace > content back to the node that inserted it? 0.5 has security problems. 0.7 has security problems. Either way you are vulnerable primarily to those nodes you are directly connected to. Who are far fewer in 0.7, and who you hopefully already know, in 0.7. Whereas on 0.5 you may well be connected to the [insert bad guys]. Hence the darknet model is safer - at least, it's safer from a distant adversary. It is less safe from the point of view of a personal betrayal. And it remains an explicit goal that it be impossible to trace the author of an insert, however if you happen to be directly connected to them, you have a good chance of busting them with a correlation attack or something similar, until we implement premix routing (in 0.8). Also there are a number of important features which are not implemented yet, and a variety of attacks are possible. One of the big ones is that we don't have proper encryption yet; connections are encrypted, but not authenticated yet, so they can be MITMed or spoofed. That will be fixed in the reasonably near future. http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FreenetZeroPointSevenSecurity -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060729/9437ff62/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's
"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ? That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly not before 1.0. 0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g. simulations. Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase. On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: > > I agree. I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable > enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is > activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5 -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060729/8f85b9a6/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7
He has to connect to 0.7 nodes. He cannot connect to 0.5 nodes. He can get 0.7 nodes from his friends who run freenet 0.7, or from other sources such as #freenet-refs on irc.freenode.net. On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:57:01PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote: > I don't think you answered all of his question(s). > > > [Original Message] > > From: Matthew Toseland > > To: Level 13 > > Cc: > > Date: 7/28/2006 9:20:19 PM > > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7 > > > > You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to > > several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content > > reset. > > > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:43:56PM +0200, Level 13 wrote: > > > What's the best plan for upgrading from 0.5 to 0.7? > > > Is it still so that in order to use 0.7 you have to know a node that's > > > already in the network? If so, can I simply pick any node from "open > > > connections" on my node's control panel? > > > > > > Is the content under 0.7 the same or completely different? > > -- > > Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org > > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > > > ___ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060729/1eee3dbc/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] New installation on dedicated server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Run the command: DISPLAY="" java -jar selfextractpack.jar That will run the text only version of the installer. BlueStar88 wrote: > I'm back after a break. > > Now i see only java-autoinstall packages to download. And the linux > variants seem to be strictly X11 dependend. So i cannot install them on > dedicated non-gui'ed linux rooties. > > Is there a way to get a non X11 dependend installation package, like before? > > > > Greets > > Manuel > > ___ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEy9U4PxPQy5glAMwRAntwAJ42uJ+PFb23TJQTvHWPZBOciGyISACg25cz 7/551KgYqR5n1Gr4XmGAgGI= =c64K -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[freenet-support] Switching it off for a while
Am Donnerstag, 27. Juli 2006 09:45 schrieb Ortwin Regel: > You could always change your nodename to "I'll be back" or something before > you leave, then people connected at that time can see that you are just > away temporarily. That's what I was planning to do. Or send them a short node2node message... -- Mailing list archives are not a proper form of documentation.
[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple wrote: > > Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the >download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured >as the preferred download. > > http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html > > Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated >in favor of 0.5. New users are not sticking around on 0.7 because there >are few content, finding peers harder with darknet along other problems, >bugs and continual updates. > >Pushing 0.7 onto new users in spite of it lack of maturity is in poor form. > P.S. On a related topic of reports & complains about a lack of content >on Freenet 0.7, I may have an explanation for that. I am in touch with a >number of major Freenet (0.5) content providers since I run the largest >media & content index site on Freenet 0.5 (FreeNova). Many users, >including my self, are staying with 0.5 until 0.7 proves itself. > > Scruple > I agree. I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5
[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland wrote: >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" >Content-Disposition: inline personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more compatible > >You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to >several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content >reset. This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible. On a related note... If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace content back to the node that inserted it?
[freenet-support] uninstall
Hi I want to uninstall freenet what do i do to make it hapend? -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060729/365d4547/attachment.html>
[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7
You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content reset. On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:43:56PM +0200, Level 13 wrote: > What's the best plan for upgrading from 0.5 to 0.7? > Is it still so that in order to use 0.7 you have to know a node that's > already in the network? If so, can I simply pick any node from "open > connections" on my node's control panel? > > Is the content under 0.7 the same or completely different? -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060729/53bf48a6/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7
What's the best plan for upgrading from 0.5 to 0.7? Is it still so that in order to use 0.7 you have to know a node that's already in the network? If so, can I simply pick any node from "open connections" on my node's control panel? Is the content under 0.7 the same or completely different?
Re: [freenet-support] Switching it off for a while
Am Donnerstag, 27. Juli 2006 09:45 schrieb Ortwin Regel: You could always change your nodename to I'll be back or something before you leave, then people connected at that time can see that you are just away temporarily. That's what I was planning to do. Or send them a short node2node message... -- Mailing list archives are not a proper form of documentation. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7
He has to connect to 0.7 nodes. He cannot connect to 0.5 nodes. He can get 0.7 nodes from his friends who run freenet 0.7, or from other sources such as #freenet-refs on irc.freenode.net. On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:57:01PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote: I don't think you answered all of his question(s). [Original Message] From: Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Level 13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: support@freenetproject.org Date: 7/28/2006 9:20:19 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7 You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content reset. On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:43:56PM +0200, Level 13 wrote: What's the best plan for upgrading from 0.5 to 0.7? Is it still so that in order to use 0.7 you have to know a node that's already in the network? If so, can I simply pick any node from open connections on my node's control panel? Is the content under 0.7 the same or completely different? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] uninstall
Hi I want to uninstall freenet what do i do to make it hapend? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Disposition: inline personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more compatible You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content reset. This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible. On a related note... If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace content back to the node that inserted it? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured as the preferred download. http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated in favor of 0.5. New users are not sticking around on 0.7 because there are few content, finding peers harder with darknet along other problems, bugs and continual updates. Pushing 0.7 onto new users in spite of it lack of maturity is in poor form. P.S. On a related topic of reports complains about a lack of content on Freenet 0.7, I may have an explanation for that. I am in touch with a number of major Freenet (0.5) content providers since I run the largest media content index site on Freenet 0.5 (FreeNova). Many users, including my self, are staying with 0.5 until 0.7 proves itself. Scruple I agree. I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Disposition: inline personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more compatible It's more standards compliant. You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content reset. This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible. Yes. On a related note... If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace content back to the node that inserted it? 0.5 has security problems. 0.7 has security problems. Either way you are vulnerable primarily to those nodes you are directly connected to. Who are far fewer in 0.7, and who you hopefully already know, in 0.7. Whereas on 0.5 you may well be connected to the [insert bad guys]. Hence the darknet model is safer - at least, it's safer from a distant adversary. It is less safe from the point of view of a personal betrayal. And it remains an explicit goal that it be impossible to trace the author of an insert, however if you happen to be directly connected to them, you have a good chance of busting them with a correlation attack or something similar, until we implement premix routing (in 0.8). Also there are a number of important features which are not implemented yet, and a variety of attacks are possible. One of the big ones is that we don't have proper encryption yet; connections are encrypted, but not authenticated yet, so they can be MITMed or spoofed. That will be fixed in the reasonably near future. http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FreenetZeroPointSevenSecurity -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] New installation on dedicated server
I'm back after a break. Now i see only java-autoinstall packages to download. And the linux variants seem to be strictly X11 dependend. So i cannot install them on dedicated non-gui'ed linux rooties. Is there a way to get a non X11 dependend installation package, like before? Greets Manuel ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] New installation on dedicated server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Run the command: DISPLAY= java -jar selfextractpack.jar That will run the text only version of the installer. BlueStar88 wrote: I'm back after a break. Now i see only java-autoinstall packages to download. And the linux variants seem to be strictly X11 dependend. So i cannot install them on dedicated non-gui'ed linux rooties. Is there a way to get a non X11 dependend installation package, like before? Greets Manuel ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEy9U4PxPQy5glAMwRAntwAJ42uJ+PFb23TJQTvHWPZBOciGyISACg25cz 7/551KgYqR5n1Gr4XmGAgGI= =c64K -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: New installation on dedicated server
Thanks Alex, worked fine! Alex Beal schrieb: Run the command: DISPLAY= java -jar selfextractpack.jar That will run the text only version of the installer. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Disposition: inline --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year ? That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly not before 1.0. 0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g. simulations. Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase. Ok, I should rephrase until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is activated On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: =20 I agree. I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5 --=20 Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEy4ygOHFIJVywduQRAk5mAKCKvmAG7uJMyLy5nBFc8LFXH9I8SwCfWHRu E4+zIwH4Bzwg9qp34vun8xU= =J7A9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg-- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8 Content-Disposition: inline --VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=3Dpgp-sha1; protocol=3Dapplication/pgp-signature; boundary=3DMGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Disposition: inline =20 personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more compatible It's more standards compliant. Perhaps, but useless to programs that do not understand pgp-mime. Sadly, I lack the skills to add this capability to Jack B. Nymble and I am entirely too stubborn to change software from what has worked for me for years, thus your msgs are not verifyable to me at all. You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content reset. =20 This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible. Yes. =20 On a related note... =20 If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace content back to the node that inserted it? 0.5 has security problems. 0.7 has security problems. Either way you are vulnerable primarily to those nodes you are directly connected to. Who are far fewer in 0.7, and who you hopefully already know, in 0.7. Whereas on 0.5 you may well be connected to the [insert bad guys]. Hence the darknet model is safer - at least, it's safer from a distant adversary. It is less safe from the point of view of a personal betrayal. And it remains an explicit goal that it be impossible to trace the author of an insert, however if you happen to be directly connected to them, you have a good chance of busting them with a correlation attack or something similar, until we implement premix routing (in 0.8). Also there are a number of important features which are not implemented yet, and a variety of attacks are possible. One of the big ones is that we don't have proper encryption yet; connections are encrypted, but not authenticated yet, so they can be MITMed or spoofed. That will be fixed in the reasonably near future. Thanks for the clarification. That helps my decision of what to insert where. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
