-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
vinyl1 wrote:
> When you use Freenet .7, you are testing an alpha, and an early alpha at
> that.
>
> They have not yet coded the promised opennet and onion premix routing, but
> are concentrating on getting the Darknet to work.
>
> If you want someth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
vinyl1 wrote:
> When you use Freenet .7, you are testing an alpha, and an early alpha at
> that.
>
> They have not yet coded the promised opennet and onion premix routing, but
> are concentrating on getting the Darknet to work.
>
> If you want someth
When you use Freenet .7, you are testing an alpha, and an early alpha at
that.
They have not yet coded the promised opennet and onion premix routing, but
are concentrating on getting the Darknet to work.
If you want something that is usable and stable, and would prefer not to be
part of a softwar
Hello, I'm running Freenet 0.7 build #1016 off of Debian stable.
Occasionally Freenet will come to a slow halt then die, complaining that
it has too many open files. Restarting the node fixes the problem, at
first I would only have this problem once every three days now I seem to
be getting it seve
When you use Freenet .7, you are testing an alpha, and an early alpha at
that.
They have not yet coded the promised opennet and onion premix routing, but
are concentrating on getting the Darknet to work.
If you want something that is usable and stable, and would prefer not to be
part of a softwar
Hello, I'm running Freenet 0.7 build #1016 off of Debian stable.
Occasionally Freenet will come to a slow halt then die, complaining that
it has too many open files. Restarting the node fixes the problem, at
first I would only have this problem once every three days now I seem to
be getting it seve
as 'feedback is the breakfast of champions - the one minute manager'
here is some:
freenet concept is great and thanks for bringing it to us
the 0.7 freenet experience is pretty tricky to the user:
good points:
-WEB interfaces to config the freenet is really good
-WEB access are really faster t