[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1097

), the mailing lists, or IRC. Thanks. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/c0bd41f5/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] jSite insertions fail

2 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B | + PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 --+ -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/a2324272/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Is Freenet not anonymous to use as it is? Can it even be dangerous for people to use, as they are mislead to think it is anonymous?

where we are going. It's not > perfect, but it's improving, and it's useful. 0.7, amongst other changes, > introduces the long-term "darknet" feature, which will be critical to > Freenet's long term security and survivability. > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/dbeaa616/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] www.minihowto.org find freenet too difficult for endusers, documentation needs to be shortened

- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/108f6da1/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Is Freenet not anonymous to use as it is? Can it even be dangerous for people to use, as they are mislead to think it is anonymous?

net's long term security and survivability. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/a9c21e41/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Node shredders my hard disk

etproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/2d959aa4/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Greetings from a newbie and possible helper.

Greetings FreeNeters, I've been exploring and testing various systems for anonymous Internet use and installed Freenet a week or so a go. My interest is largely for ideological reasons. With the coming of the Internet, it seems governments, corporations, illegal organizations, etc. are all

[freenet-support] Is Freenet not anonymous to use as it is? Can it even be dangerous for people to use, as they are mislead to think it is anonymous?

:-) I love the Freenet Idea, and this is a positive thread I have made. I have been reading the newest documentation for freenet 0.7, and as I interpret it, freenet is not anomymous to use for me, and most other freenet newbies, as we do not have any "friends" to exchange "reference nodes"

Re: [freenet-support] Is Freenet not anonymous to use as it is? Can it even be dangerous for people to use, as they are mislead to think it is anonymous?

On Thursday 03 January 2008 03:01, niel wrote: :-) I love the Freenet Idea, and this is a positive thread I have made. I have been reading the newest documentation for freenet 0.7, and as I interpret it, freenet is not anomymous to use for me, and most other freenet newbies, as we do

Re: [freenet-support] www.minihowto.org find freenet too difficult for endusers, documentation needs to be shortened

On Wednesday 26 December 2007 11:51, niel wrote: :-) I am writing some minihowtos for linux newbies, and have also written about freenet. Hi. Yes, your mini-howto was good, so we linked to it, but we had to remove it when opennet (insecure mode) came in because it was no longer up to date.

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1097

Freenet 0.7 build 1097 is now available. Please upgrade. This is mostly bugfixes, but some of them are fairly significant. There is much improved support for running the node on GCJ thanks to xor, although much remains to be done (the web interface isn't very responsive on GCJ for example).

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1097

On Friday 04 January 2008 00.51.33 Matthew Toseland wrote: Freenet 0.7 build 1097 is now available. Please upgrade. This is mostly bugfixes, but some of them are fairly significant. There is much improved support for running the node on GCJ thanks to xor, although much remains to be done (the