[freenet-support] 1143 seems to have a few problems

2008-04-24 Thread vinyl1
It seems that memory use is up, and so is the number of peers backed off. Maybe peers are experiencing memory issues? I have cut my output bandwith in an attempt to mitigate the problem.

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1141, 1142, 1143

2008-04-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080424/1f0fd060/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Node complains: Please forward UDP port xxx

2008-04-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
reenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080424/b743efd0/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Node complains: Please forward UDP port xxx

2008-04-24 Thread bbac...@googlemail.com
Ok, that is what the node message says. The point is that I never saw this message before, and the node now always shows this message, even when the node runs for >24 hours. So something was changed in the node code. I will ignore it. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: >

[freenet-support] Node complains: Please forward UDP port xxx

2008-04-24 Thread bbac...@googlemail.com
Starting with 1142 the node complains that the UDP port is not forwarded. It is actually forwarded, and was forwarded always without problems... Other apps do not complain about their forwarded port. Am I the only one who has this problem? Can I ignore it?

[freenet-support] Node complains: Please forward UDP port xxx

2008-04-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
on-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080424/d70bfb0a/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Node complains: Please forward UDP port xxx

2008-04-24 Thread bbackde
Starting with 1142 the node complains that the UDP port is not forwarded. It is actually forwarded, and was forwarded always without problems... Other apps do not complain about their forwarded port. Am I the only one who has this problem? Can I ignore it?

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.0 Release Candidate 2 is now available!

2008-04-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet version 0.7 Release Candidate 2 is now available for public testing. Release candidate 2 features many bugfixes and a number of usability improvements. Freenet is a global peer-to-peer network designed to allow users to publish and consume information without fear of censorship. To use

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1141, 1142, 1143

2008-04-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7 build 1143 was released yesterday, and is mandatory tomorrow. Sorry for the lack of changelogs. Here they are for the last few builds: 1141: - Don't give up so easily when loading plugins. We were having some problems with plugins failing to load. 1142: - Show one-line summaries of

[freenet-support] 1143 seems to have a few problems

2008-04-24 Thread vinyl1
It seems that memory use is up, and so is the number of peers backed off. Maybe peers are experiencing memory issues? I have cut my output bandwith in an attempt to mitigate the problem. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org