[freenet-support] Ports to forward, hostname (dyndns)
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 22:09:49 +0100 "Level 13" wrote: > Is it enough to portforward listen-port and opennet-listen-port on > your NAT router in order for a 0.7 node to work properly Yes it's enough. >(so two ports > here as opposed to one port in 0.5)? One port if you only run Darknet or Opennet, or two ports of you run both. Another major difference with 0.5, besides the switch to UDP and the introduction of Darknet among other things, is that Freenet 0.7 does work even for users that for one or another reason can't forward any ports (for instance, those who can't access the router). These users can't connect to each other but they can still connect to anyone who can forward a port, so Freenet will work for them, as opposed to 0.5 where they could only load a bunch of extremely popular freesite. >How about the dyndns hostname, > where do you have to put it (that is, if this function is still the > same as it was on 0.5, so if you have a dynamic IP you can use a > dyndns hostname)? You paste your dyndns address in the field marked 'override IP address' in the configuration page. -- FAFS - The Freenet Applications FreeSite USK at ugb~uuscsidMI-Ze8laZe~o3BUIb3S50i25RIwDH99M,9T20t3xoG-dQfMO94LGOl9AxRTkaz~TykFY-voqaTQI,AQACAAE/FAFS/41/ freemail: luke771 at MJWEES3VJBMS2ZKMIJUECT3SJB3UK5SBKBAVQYJQO5FXGWSROE2USNDKNMZU2SK2ORXUKLDZJYWXQUSNMRYUCWD6IF3HAULWKRKWW2SJJVEGQQTDNNKGYMRWKFZW6V3ONNIDKQ3DKR3SYQKRIFBUCQKF.freemail
[freenet-support] Ports to forward, hostname (dyndns)
Is it enough to portforward listen-port and opennet-listen-port on your NAT router in order for a 0.7 node to work properly (so two ports here as opposed to one port in 0.5)? How about the dyndns hostname, where do you have to put it (that is, if this function is still the same as it was on 0.5, so if you have a dynamic IP you can use a dyndns hostname)?
Re: [freenet-support] Ports to forward, hostname (dyndns)
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 22:09:49 +0100 "Level 13" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it enough to portforward listen-port and opennet-listen-port on > your NAT router in order for a 0.7 node to work properly Yes it's enough. >(so two ports > here as opposed to one port in 0.5)? One port if you only run Darknet or Opennet, or two ports of you run both. Another major difference with 0.5, besides the switch to UDP and the introduction of Darknet among other things, is that Freenet 0.7 does work even for users that for one or another reason can't forward any ports (for instance, those who can't access the router). These users can't connect to each other but they can still connect to anyone who can forward a port, so Freenet will work for them, as opposed to 0.5 where they could only load a bunch of extremely popular freesite. >How about the dyndns hostname, > where do you have to put it (that is, if this function is still the > same as it was on 0.5, so if you have a dynamic IP you can use a > dyndns hostname)? You paste your dyndns address in the field marked 'override IP address' in the configuration page. -- FAFS - The Freenet Applications FreeSite [EMAIL PROTECTED],9T20t3xoG-dQfMO94LGOl9AxRTkaz~TykFY-voqaTQI,AQACAAE/FAFS/41/ freemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Ports to forward, hostname (dyndns)
Is it enough to portforward listen-port and opennet-listen-port on your NAT router in order for a 0.7 node to work properly (so two ports here as opposed to one port in 0.5)? How about the dyndns hostname, where do you have to put it (that is, if this function is still the same as it was on 0.5, so if you have a dynamic IP you can use a dyndns hostname)? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]