[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread bbac...@googlemail.com
Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^ I referred to the mail from Peter J. in the "Version 1179?" thread. He said the temporary files bug could be fixed. On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:54, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread bbac...@googlemail.com
This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for some reason we get no online update and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh works on Linux... On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:33, Ulrich Koepping wrote: > I have the same problem as described in Bug ID

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:55:25 bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites > like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable? > I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179. > Yes had that

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

2008-11-17 Thread bbac...@googlemail.com
Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable? I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179. On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya wrote: > Volodya wrote: >> bbackde at

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

2008-11-17 Thread bbac...@googlemail.com
Ok, thanks for your answer... update.CMD now downloaded 1178 (said it was a new version, but I had 1178 before) and since then update.CMD thinks I'm current enough. Still no online update offering. I keep waiting, maybe it works when 1180 is there... On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread Ulrich Koepping
I have the same problem as described in Bug ID 0002694, after updating to latest freenet version, downloads fail - this happened with multiple keys. Klicking on restart in downloads menu does result in the same error immediately : "Temporary files error: invalid block type". I deleted the

[freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote: > On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided > > you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests > > that it won't go away and

[freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided > you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests > that it won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be > told if it

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:59:20 +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^ You should be able to download the snapshot jar from http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ ... 1179 = r23606, and replace the one you're currently using.

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for > some reason we get no online update > and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh > works on Linux... Are you sure? From what I'm

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

2008-11-17 Thread Volodya
Volodya wrote: > bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: >> Many of my peers seem to run 1179 since this morning. I got no notice >> about this version via mailing list, >> and my node (1178) doesn't offer me this new version for update. >> Is something broken? update.cmd also doesn't work, see my

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

2008-11-17 Thread Volodya
bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > Many of my peers seem to run 1179 since this morning. I got no notice > about this version via mailing list, > and my node (1178) doesn't offer me this new version for update. > Is something broken? update.cmd also doesn't work, see my previous > mail that was

[freenet-support] bugs

2008-11-17 Thread Dupuy Claude
3 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node

[freenet-support] bug

2008-11-17 Thread dalej8
Probably a bug: please report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 1 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at

[freenet-support] Probably a bug: please report: 2 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets.

2008-11-17 Thread d...@darkn3t.net
2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/http://127.0.0.1:/?_CHECKED_HTTP_=https://bugs.freenetproject.org/or at [EMAIL

[freenet-support] Bug Report

2008-11-17 Thread Ted Hexter
2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node

[freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-17 Thread Markus Hahn
Dear Supporters, I am a total newbie in freenet. Every time I start freenet I get the alert that my node lies behind a NAT-device or a Firewall and that I should forward my port-Number 11833. After some discovery-attempts in the administration tool of my router I found out that there is

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote: Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests that it won't go away and is still present. : In any case we need to be told if it

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote: On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote: Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests that it won't go away and is

Re: [freenet-support] Version 1179?

2008-11-17 Thread bbackde
Ok, thanks for your answer... update.CMD now downloaded 1178 (said it was a new version, but I had 1178 before) and since then update.CMD thinks I'm current enough. Still no online update offering. I keep waiting, maybe it works when 1180 is there... On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] Version 1179?

2008-11-17 Thread bbackde
Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable? I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179. On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Volodya wrote: [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] Version 1179?

2008-11-17 Thread Peter J.
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:55:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable? I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179. Yes had that also with

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread Ulrich Koepping
I have the same problem as described in Bug ID 0002694, after updating to latest freenet version, downloads fail - this happened with multiple keys. Klicking on restart in downloads menu does result in the same error immediately : Temporary files error: invalid block type. I deleted the

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread bbackde
This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for some reason we get no online update and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh works on Linux... On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:33, Ulrich Koepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the same problem as

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for some reason we get no online update and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh works on Linux... Are you sure? From what I'm hearing in

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread bbackde
Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^ I referred to the mail from Peter J. in the Version 1179? thread. He said the temporary files bug could be fixed. On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:54, Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:59:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^ You should be able to download the snapshot jar from http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ ... 1179 = r23606, and replace the one you're currently using.