On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:57:27 +0100
SmallSister development wrote:
> Luke771 wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500
> > Dennis Nezic wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
> >>> I get the error message:
> One or more of your node's peers ha
Luke771 wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500
> Dennis Nezic wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
>>> I get the error message:
One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two
weeks since they were added. Consider removing
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500
Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
> > I get the error message:
> > > One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two
> > > weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are
I get the error message:
> One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two
> weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are
> marginally affecting performance (wasting packets talking to nodes
> that aren't there).
A quick investigation identified the culprit:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Luke771 wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:57:27 +0100
> SmallSister development wrote:
>
>> Luke771 wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500
>>> Dennis Nezic wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
> I get the error message:
> > One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two
> > weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are
> > marginally affecting performance (wasting packets talking to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Luke771 wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:57:27 +0100
> SmallSister development wrote:
>
>> Luke771 wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500
>>> Dennis Nezic wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:57:27 +0100
SmallSister development wrote:
> Luke771 wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500
> > Dennis Nezic wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
> >>> I get the error message:
> One or more of your node's peers ha
Luke771 wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500
> Dennis Nezic wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
>>> I get the error message:
One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two
weeks since they were added. Consider removing
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:46 -0500
Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
> > I get the error message:
> > > One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two
> > > weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote:
> I get the error message:
> > One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two
> > weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are
> > marginally affecting performance (wasting packets talking to
I get the error message:
> One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two
> weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are
> marginally affecting performance (wasting packets talking to nodes
> that aren't there).
A quick investigation identified the culprit:
12 matches
Mail list logo