On Sun, 3 May 2009 01:46:37 -0400, Juiceman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > On Friday 24 April 2009 17:46:09 freenetwork at web.de wrote:
> >> 1) CHK-keys are already long enough
> >
> > Long enough to be a PITA if they are longer? Or long enough to be
> >
On Sun, 3 May 2009 01:46:37 -0400, Juiceman wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 24 April 2009 17:46:09 freenetw...@web.de wrote:
1) CHK-keys are already long enough
Long enough to be a PITA if they are longer? Or long enough