[freenet-support] internal error - node.db4o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - From Frost (since nobody seems to be using Freenet from development team): - - Anonymous - 2009.06.30 - 08:18:42GMT - I had message internal error in download/upload queue I moved file node.db4o to backup directory - and now everything works. But i lost all my download/upload keys. Anybody knows if there is any chance to get them back? just keys or filenames... i tried some tools for db4o database but don't work. is it encrypted or something? - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal http://www.freedomporn.org/ Freedom Porn, anarchist and activist smut None of us are free until all of us are free.~ Mihail Bakunin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpN/1UACgkQuWy2EFICg+2MiACgo9n7dOLPt2bYODTO5m8iIku6 J+cAoNPoPiLfRerEpU5MRugvY6llXaEs =pRu8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] internal error - node.db4o
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:53:53 +0100, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - From Frost (since nobody seems to be using Freenet from development team): - - Anonymous - 2009.06.30 - 08:18:42GMT - I had message internal error in download/upload queue I moved file node.db4o to backup directory - and now everything works. But i lost all my download/upload keys. Anybody knows if there is any chance to get them back? just keys or filenames... i tried some tools for db4o database but don't work. is it encrypted or something? This (node.db4o corruption) should be a known bug. (I mentioned it here on June 12th). It's kind of hard to duplicate -- for me it usually occurs when I have more than an average amount of data/items in my queues and my node.db4o is unusually large (200+ MB vs. a more normal 50MB). ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] Logout
Hi. I've just downloaded freenet 0.7 for Mac. The installation works perfectly, but when I try to start freenet, the terminal says : Starting freenet; Logout Then, I can't start freenet again (there is the lock with the freenet.pid). Thus I suppose a bit of Freenet has been started, but it doesn't work. What can I do? Thank you. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] Probably a bug - peer forcibly disconnected
Freenet is reporting the following on my status page: Probably a bug: please report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 1 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or to the support mailing list supp...@freenetproject.org. Please include this message and what version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are: * 201.227.63.21:46522 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 02:23:42 user1 wrote: Sorry, I am working on a very enduser level. I am still waiting for a system to come up. so I can work on a friends level (means invincible) - meaning to exchange nodes with friends anonymously in a proper way, probably ver 0,8. What do you mean by that? Do you have any suggestions for how to improve getting connections to your real-world or online friends? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] New model fit-pc2 out
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 16:42:58 user1 wrote: On Tuesday 23 June 2009 03:23:42 am user1 wrote: On Tuesday 23 June 2009 12:54:02 am Juiceman wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:05 AM, user1bq...@telia.com wrote: I have been testing a fit-pc older model as a mini freenet server with success. Just quite slow for administration. I have noticed that a newer model is out (7 w power consumption): Here are the specifications: http://fit-pc2.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page Please note that you plug the harddisk into a miniSD socket, and thus it is easy to switch harddisks - any 2.5 sata harddisk will do - one for possibly private -or one for non private stuff. Here is a minitest: http://www.linux.com/news/hardware/desktops/18899-fit-pc2-ubuntu-deskto p- in-a- tiny-box ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe Cool! What kind of performance do you get out of it? I had power failure to day 23 june 2009, and my fit-pc mini freenet server was shut down. Half an hour later it was up again by itself running without me touching it. Here is some statistic from when it again was up running: Ubuntu 8.04 - 256 mb ram - Freenet ver. 0.7.5 - store size 20 GB Java ver. 1.6.0_07 JVM ver. 10.0-b23 Used Java memory 27.4 MiB Allocated Java memory 59.6 MiB Max Java memory 254 MiB Running threads 94/500 Connected 19 Busy 1 Input rate 25.5 KiB/s (of 200 KiB/s) Output rate 26.8 KiB/s (of 50.0 KiB/s) Total input 21.9 MiB (9.25 KiB/s average) Total output 32.9 MiB (13.9 KiB/s average) Payload output 21.8 MiB (9.23 KiB/sec) (66 %) # 1222 build 01222 # 26r23771 So for the last some couple of months my mini freenet server has updated everything automatic by itself without any interference from me, and kept running and running Yes but the Total Output is a little disappointing. Are you getting heavy CPU usage? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] internal error - node.db4o
On Friday 03 July 2009 15:35:09 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:53:53 +0100, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - From Frost (since nobody seems to be using Freenet from development team): - - Anonymous - 2009.06.30 - 08:18:42GMT - I had message internal error in download/upload queue I moved file node.db4o to backup directory - and now everything works. But i lost all my download/upload keys. Anybody knows if there is any chance to get them back? just keys or filenames... i tried some tools for db4o database but don't work. is it encrypted or something? This (node.db4o corruption) should be a known bug. (I mentioned it here on June 12th). It's kind of hard to duplicate -- for me it usually occurs when I have more than an average amount of data/items in my queues and my node.db4o is unusually large (200+ MB vs. a more normal 50MB). It is caused by either flaky hardware or bugs in db4o itself. Either way there is little we can do about it apart from regular automated backups. We will implement that eventually. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] freenet fails to run 3
On Saturday 20 June 2009 16:40:32 Egbert van der Meer wrote: I am using Windows XP and Firefox both up to date. I hope this mail will not bounce because it'srather big. Yes indeed! Your problem is this: * Input Rate: 126 B/s (of 1.06 KiB/s) You have set the input bandwidth limit to 1.06KB/sec. This is evidently not enough for Freenet to work acceptably. This explains the rejections: Local Preemptive Rejection Reasons 15029 Input bandwidth liability 38 SUB_MAX_PING_TIME Go to the config menu, click on Core settings, change your input bandwidth limit to something reasonable, at least 8KB, a lot more if you have enough (downstream) bandwidth. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] freenet fails to run 3
On Sunday 21 June 2009 07:18:19 Evan Daniel wrote: On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Egbert van der Meere.vanderm...@wolmail.nl wrote: I have disabled both antivirus and firewall but it makes no difference. Atached is an plugin report stating the ports are forwarded succesfully. The test using another computer can not perform. Monitoring my CPU does not show any overload. Waiting for more suggestions to solve this problem. UPP plugin report The following device has been found : ZyXEL Prestige 2602H-61 Internet Sharing Gateway Our current external ip address is : (deleted) Our reported max downstream bit rate is : 13220 bits/sec Our reported max upstream bit rate is : 970 bits/sec Your upstream bandwidth is under 1 Kib/s? That's glacial even by dialup standards. I would say that counts as something seriously broken with your connection. Unfortunately, I doubt there's any way to make Freenet work over that slow a connection. Woah, scary numbers. Is your connection really this slow or is your router reporting bogus results? We may have to add some additional sanity checking, maybe a blacklist for ZyXEL routers; it looks like the above are probably in kilobits instead of in bits; you have ADSL2, right? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] internal error - node.db4o
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:25:26 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Friday 03 July 2009 15:35:09 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:53:53 +0100, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - From Frost (since nobody seems to be using Freenet from development team): - - Anonymous - 2009.06.30 - 08:18:42GMT - I had message internal error in download/upload queue I moved file node.db4o to backup directory - and now everything works. But i lost all my download/upload keys. Anybody knows if there is any chance to get them back? just keys or filenames... i tried some tools for db4o database but don't work. is it encrypted or something? This (node.db4o corruption) should be a known bug. (I mentioned it here on June 12th). It's kind of hard to duplicate -- for me it usually occurs when I have more than an average amount of data/items in my queues and my node.db4o is unusually large (200+ MB vs. a more normal 50MB). It is caused by either flaky hardware or bugs in db4o itself. Either way there is little we can do about it apart from regular automated backups. We will implement that eventually. I will have to humbly disagree :P. I'm running on top of Software Raid5 (and LVM), so any disk-io bugs (hardware or otherwise) would have been handled gracefully. (And my smartd daemon would have picked up on it too.) And I don't think a corruption bug this serious would still be in the wild in something as big and popular as db4o :P. (*cough*.) ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
