Re: [freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 50, Issue 9

2009-11-10 Thread Evan Daniel
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:58 AM, freenet free...@pacbell.net wrote: On Nov 9, 2009, at 17:16:24 +0100, bimbek bimbek...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not need to ban the poor guy. I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because some US

Re: [freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 50, Issue 9

2009-11-10 Thread urza9814
Freenet is exactly what was being discussed. He wasn't looking for support for illegal activities, he was looking for support for Freenet, which he happened to be using in a way that in certain countries is illegal. So should we refuse support to anyone asking for help with freenet if their use of

Re: [freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 50, Issue 9

2009-11-10 Thread Evan Daniel
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM, urza9...@gmail.com wrote: Freenet is exactly what was being discussed. He wasn't looking for support for illegal activities, he was looking for support for Freenet, which he happened to be using in a way that in certain countries is illegal. So should we

Re: [freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 50, Issue 9

2009-11-10 Thread bqz69
If Freenet is probibited, something better will pop up, I think, the development of the Internet never stops, and still smarter guys will show up? Please stop this dialog, and go to the freenet message boards and continue - thanks *laugh* ___ Support