[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1339

2011-01-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
Build 1339 is out. Please upgrade asap, it will be mandatory on Monday. The main change in this build is that backoff is now separate for realtime versus bulk requests. This means, hopefully, that if the performance problems recently have been caused by realtime requests causing lots of

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1339

2011-01-29 Thread Volodya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/2011 04:54 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: Build 1339 is out. Please upgrade asap, it will be mandatory on Monday. The main change in this build is that backoff is now separate for realtime versus bulk requests. This means, hopefully, that

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1339

2011-01-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 29 January 2011 18:15:19 Volodya wrote: On 01/29/2011 04:54 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: Build 1339 is out. Please upgrade asap, it will be mandatory on Monday. The main change in this build is that backoff is now separate for realtime versus bulk requests. This means,

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1339

2011-01-29 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:54:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Build 1339 is out. Please upgrade asap, it will be mandatory on Monday. The main change in this build is that backoff is now separate for realtime versus bulk requests. This means, hopefully, that if the performance problems recently

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1336

2011-01-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 28 January 2011 23:04:27 Phillip Hutchings wrote: I was referring to Freenet's custom congestion control. There is no resending of UDP packets, unless Freenet pro-actively resends it. Right, and what we do is we resend packets if they are not acknowledged after a few round

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1336

2011-01-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 28 January 2011 18:25:09 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:14:14 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: (My last flood occurred for over 10 minutes, and then managed to stop. I believe all 5 of my connected strangers were listed as BackedOff during the flood. I will try

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1339

2011-01-29 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:25:48 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:54:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Build 1339 is out. Please upgrade asap, it will be mandatory on Monday. The main change in this build is that backoff is now separate for realtime versus bulk requests. This

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1336

2011-01-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 28 January 2011 18:39:53 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:11:29 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: CC'ing Martin in case he has any ideas. On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:01:28 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:49:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Thursday

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1339

2011-01-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 29 January 2011 18:25:48 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:54:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Build 1339 is out. Please upgrade asap, it will be mandatory on Monday. The main change in this build is that backoff is now separate for realtime versus bulk requests. This

[freenet-support] Please test the new load management branch

2011-01-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
Please get the snapshot (update.cmd testing / update.sh testing), and test it. I want to know if it causes serious problems, and also any other bugs you run into. I know there will be various errors, but I am still interested in the more severe ones. For people building from source: The tag

Re: [freenet-support] [freenet-dev] Please test the new load management branch

2011-01-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 30 January 2011 00:30:09 Matthew Toseland wrote: Please get the snapshot (update.cmd testing / update.sh testing), and test it. I want to know if it causes serious problems, and also any other bugs you run into. I know there will be various errors, but I am still interested in the