Re: [freenet-support] node.ipAddressOverride
The box I have running Fred has multiple IPv4 and IPv6 IPs. I want Fred to use one of each. I had first attempted to set bindTo to the two IPs I want it to use, but although I could get both IPv4 and IPv6 to work independently, I was not able to get it to bind to one of each. The only way I could get both to work was to allow it to bind to all. -Pascal On 10/4/2012 10:31 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Friday 28 Sep 2012 22:01:46 Pascal wrote: node.ipAddressOverride is not working correctly in the noderef. Instead of overriding physical.udp it is prepending it. Sorry for the unclear documentation. IP address override doesn't override the other detected IPs; this is intended. We only override it if you set bindTo as well. Of course you can't do that if you're e.g. on a static IP but behind a NAT. Usually bindTo is only used when there are multiple local internet connections and you only want Freenet to use one of them, in which case we should only advertise that address. Do you need a true ip address override that works even if you don't have a local inet interface? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Datastore resize
"Datastore(PUBKEY-cache) maintenance in progress: xxx/xxx. We have changed the datastore so that it will cause less load on your computer (particularly disk accesses), but we have to rebuild the indexes first.." This is coming up every time I have to reboot. Who or what is 'we', is this planned, and if so, why haven't I anywhere seen it announced that this is supposed to happen? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet hangs and restarts shortly after startup
Am Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2012, 16:07:25 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Saturday 29 Sep 2012 22:59:19 guido wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been letting my Freenet node just run in the background without > > paying any attention to it for maybe the last 12 months or so. Lately, > > I've had another look at it and the wrapper log file, and it appears it > > hasn't been running nearly as smoothly as I thought. According to the > > wrapper logfile, it has been caught in an endless loop of starting up, > > running for a short time (~10 minutes) and then hanging and being reset > > by the wrapper. I see the > > following lines a lot in wrapper.log: > > Argh. Is this Windows, Mac or Linux? Sorry, I suppose I should have been more specific from the start... Linux > How many cores? 4 Cores > How much CPU is Freenet using just before it crashes, top shows it using about 250% CPU, even when there is no apparent reason for that. The rest appears to be used up by four ksoftirqd kernel processes. (This stops when Freenet is not running.) > and is anything else going on? (E.g. games?) There are a few KVM-based virtual machines running in the background, but they don't use a lot of resources. Apart from that, nothing big is running on this box, not even X. (It's a headless machine.) java -version reports: java version "1.6.0_35" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_35-b10) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.10-b01, mixed mode) Another thing that may be of interest: Every time freenet restarts, it says it's trying to migrate the datastore to the new format - even when it had apparently finished this migration the last time. Guido ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Datastore resize
On Friday 28 Sep 2012 21:54:45 Pascal wrote: > With the 1st stage of the rebuild taking 3 weeks, and 1416 becoming > mandatory in 2 weeks, if I had just waited my node would be unusable for > a week. I noticed an option to do the resize at startup instead that > was supposed to be faster, so I set that and upgraded. I let it run for > a bit and then did the math, it was still going to take 3 weeks. CPU > and HDD were both practically idle. I don't know what a resize does, > but it sure seems like there is a bug in there somewhere. It sleeps 100ms after processing a batch of 128 blocks, to try to avoid severe performance effects on the rest of the system. Resize on startup turns this off, so *should* be slightly faster. I have no idea why it was so slow for you but I imagine it has to do with hard disk seeks being slow - the number of bytes transferred could well be relatively low even though the hard disk is seeking constantly. > > -Pascal > > > On 9/28/2012 4:10 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 Sep 2012 02:38:07 Pascal wrote: > >> Changed my datastore size from "750g" to "850g" just over 5 hours ago. > >> It now shows "Datastore(CHK-store) resize in progress: 108040/10717960." > >>At this rate it will take about 3 weeks just to finish CHK-store. > >> Does it them take another 3 weeks to do CHK-cache? (They were the same > >> size beforehand). > > > > Datastore resizing is slow. Especially if it's already mostly full. :( > ___ > Support mailing list > Support@freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] Installation Difficulties
Hi, I have been having trouble installing Freenet on my Mac. I have Mac OS X 10.6.8 with a 2.4GHz Intel Core 2Duo Processor I tried installing, but came across a few problems detailed in the attached screenshots. Thank you for your reply! -- Seth Roberts Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20121004/15e280ac/attachment-0001.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: KNOCKScreenshot 2012-10-04 at 8.33.49 AM.png Type: image/png Size: 86564 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20121004/15e280ac/attachment-0003.png> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: KNOCKScreenshot 2012-10-04 at 8.35.09 AM.png Type: image/png Size: 161998 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20121004/15e280ac/attachment-0004.png> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: KNOCKScreenshot 2012-10-04 at 8.35.29 AM.png Type: image/png Size: 57625 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20121004/15e280ac/attachment-0005.png>
Re: [freenet-support] node.ipAddressOverride
On Friday 28 Sep 2012 22:01:46 Pascal wrote: > node.ipAddressOverride is not working correctly in the noderef. Instead > of overriding physical.udp it is prepending it. Sorry for the unclear documentation. IP address override doesn't override the other detected IPs; this is intended. We only override it if you set bindTo as well. Of course you can't do that if you're e.g. on a static IP but behind a NAT. Usually bindTo is only used when there are multiple local internet connections and you only want Freenet to use one of them, in which case we should only advertise that address. Do you need a true ip address override that works even if you don't have a local inet interface? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet hangs and restarts shortly after startup
On Saturday 29 Sep 2012 22:59:19 guido wrote: > Hi, > > I have been letting my Freenet node just run in the background without paying > any attention to it for maybe the last 12 months or so. Lately, I've had > another look at it and the wrapper log file, and it appears it hasn't been > running nearly as smoothly as I thought. According to the wrapper logfile, it > has been caught in an endless loop of starting up, running for a short time > (~10 minutes) and then hanging and being reset by the wrapper. I see the > following lines a lot in wrapper.log: Argh. Is this Windows, Mac or Linux? How many cores? How much CPU is Freenet using just before it crashes, and is anything else going on? (E.g. games?) > > [...cut...] > INFO | jvm 3280 | 2012/09/29 16:51:56 | SSK-cache cleaner in progress: > 3055616/3068886 > INFO | jvm 3280 | 2012/09/29 16:51:56 | SSK-cache cleaner in progress: > 3063808/3068886 > INFO | jvm 3280 | 2012/09/29 16:51:57 | SSK-cache cleaner finished > successfully. > ERROR | wrapper | 2012/09/29 17:06:11 | JVM appears hung: Timed out waiting > for signal from JVM. > ERROR | wrapper | 2012/09/29 17:06:11 | JVM did not exit on request, > terminated > INFO | wrapper | 2012/09/29 17:06:11 | JVM exited on its own while waiting > to kill the application. > STATUS | wrapper | 2012/09/29 17:06:12 | JVM exited in response to signal > SIGKILL (9). > STATUS | wrapper | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | Reloading Wrapper configuration... > STATUS | wrapper | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | Launching a JVM... > INFO | jvm 3281 | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | WrapperManager: Initializing... > INFO | jvm 3281 | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | WrapperManager: WARNING - The > Wrapper jar file currently in use is version "3.3.1" > INFO | jvm 3281 | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | WrapperManager: while the > version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is > INFO | jvm 3281 | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | WrapperManager: "3.2.3". > INFO | jvm 3281 | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | WrapperManager: The > Wrapper may appear to work correctly but some features may > INFO | jvm 3281 | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | WrapperManager: not > function correctly. This configuration has not been tested > INFO | jvm 3281 | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | WrapperManager: and is > not > supported. > INFO | jvm 3281 | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | WrapperManager: > INFO | jvm 3281 | 2012/09/29 17:06:16 | freenet.jar built with freenet- > ext.jar Build #29 rv29 running with ext build 29 rv29 > [...cut...] > > So, what's wrong here? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
