Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or
GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands are
even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?)
When inserting files via fproxy, I think you have to explicitly decide
whether to compress
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with GETCHK or
GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think these commands
are even possible in fproxy -- getting chk keys without inserting?)
When inserting files via
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:33:09 +0400, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with
GETCHK or GETCHKFILE or GETCHKDDIR from telnet? (I don't think
these commands are even
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:54:42 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:33:09 +0400, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:56:46 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
Is it possible to explicitly state the compression used with
GETCHK or GETCHKFILE
Maybe you can check (the last parts) of your wrapper.log file, in
freenet's folder. Maybe post it here or somewhere.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:40:44 -0700, slsm...@cox.net wrote:
Thank you for the replies. I tried starting manually with the jars
and am still unsuccessful. I changed the
service
episodi...@mtnvoeldfh6zd61fk1br94hikbkstf2xsmvqfts16lc wrote :
episodi...@mtnvoeldfh6zd61fk1br94hikbkstf2xsmvqfts16lc wrote :
ros...@mrdnrocaisdbhx3oqxnxsr2fhlrafrkk7wsoy9ecxdq wrote :
Anybody else getting this?
I insert via PutComplexDir using TogosFCP or jSite (0.6). My site
inserts fully
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:30:28 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1250 is now available. It will be mandatory on
the 15th. Changes:
- Fix a bug which resulted in inserted data being cached locally in
the client-cache. It's not supposed to be cached at all on the
inserting node.
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:37:34 +1000, Dave D wrote:
Hi there,
I have the same problem as described here:
https://freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2949
The Download page will not load, spits out a Internal error Return
to queue page. message.
Is there a way to rectify the problem without
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 22:40:09 +, Freenet Project Inc. wrote:
Customer Feedback for Freenet Project Inc.
freenet.uservoice.com [freenet.uservoice.com] New Bug Report
0 anonymous [http://freenet.uservoice.com/users/12587447-anonymous]
a...@aol.com sent a message from
What's the name of that java profiling program that profiles which
functions all the cpu work is going into? :P
(Also, during the high-cpu periods, how much memory (out of your 512mb)
is being used?)
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:00 +0200, Jep wrote:
Got a freenet node running for no less than a
file permissions
==
Any suggestion? Thanks.
Dennis Nezic schreef:
What's the name of that java profiling program that profiles which
functions all the cpu work is going into? :P
(Also, during the high-cpu periods, how much memory (out of your
512mb) is being used
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:05:48 +0200, Jep wrote:
As I'm used to by now, it took multiple efforts to get the new
Freenet version 1259 to connect to strangers; it seems to require a
complete new install from scratch and no less will do.
No way of updating works for me, FN has been whirling all
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:25:04 -0700, Ray Jones wrote:
I am having a problem with my uploads/downloads queue with 1263 (yes,
there was also a power outage - perhaps that is the problem)
FProxy will not load the Uploads or Downloads page. It just keeps
running constantly. Over in Frost, my
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:02:48 -0700, Ray Jones wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 02:41 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
What do you mean mean the uploads/downloads page will not load?
(Ie. does it not show the queued files, but rather something like
'Internal error'?)
No, there is no end
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:51:40 -0700, Ray Jones wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:34 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
O
I can reload the Browse page or the Configuration pages,
but /downloads and /uploads will not load.
Interesting. What does your wrapper.log file say (when you try
What are the bloom-123123123123.tmp files in my system's /tmp folder,
and why aren't they ever deleted?
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:05:13 +, Freenet Project Inc. wrote:
Customer Feedback for Freenet Project Inc.
freenet.uservoice.com [freenet.uservoice.com] New Bug Report
julia...@ntlworld.com sent a message from
http://freenet.uservoice.com/forums/8861-general
Until recently, I was able to start freenet directly with a cool java
blablaoptions freenet.node.Nodestarter. Not so with the latest bunch
of freenet releases :S. Is there a nice and easy way to get it run
simply, without all these wrappers (nonsense :b)?
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:08:57 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
Until recently, I was able to start freenet directly with a cool java
blablaoptions freenet.node.Nodestarter. Not so with the latest bunch
of freenet releases :S. Is there a nice and easy way to get it run
simply, without all
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:53:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1272 is now available, including a major memory
leak fix and updates to the German translation. It will be mandatory
on the 26th, and makes 1271 mandatory immediately. Please upgrade!
Thanks. I was just about to
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:06:38 +,
Freenet Project Inc. no-re...@uservoice.com wrote:
Hello, I just took a look at freenet features and I was wondering :
Since freenet does not include a pre-configured web browser, how can
you prevent ip leaks from malicious freesites (java, browser
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:01:56 -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote:
hi all.
when i upload a file, is that file on my local data store?
what does the persistence column stand for in
http://127.0.0.1:/uploads/ ?
i would like to upload a very large amount of files and i would like
to *always*
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:41:16 -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote:
That would defeat the purpose of Freenet :b. Entirely. Imagine if
many people started doing this -- the data wouldn't spread properly,
and would fall off the network fast. We sacrificed latency for
redundancy (and security) from
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:41:16 -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote:
That would defeat the purpose of Freenet :b. Entirely. Imagine if
many people started doing this -- the data wouldn't spread properly,
and would fall off the network fast. We sacrificed latency for
redundancy (and security) from
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:10:07 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
I have my web hosting service with ssh access. I installed Java 1.6
and made sure that the java command is picked up before the default
java (openJDK) using $PATH. I had the service open port and I
can now access via the
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:17:07 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
I am trying to add multiple 24/7 servers to the freenet cause but I
have run into problems. I basically had to go one by one to do it
manually.
1) wget to obtain latest version.
2) tar -xz...
3) 1run.sh
4) run.sh
It seems I
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:24:07 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
You shouldn't run into problems doing a direct copy, assuming you
change the four ports mentioned in freenet.ini. You will simply have
multiple instances of freenet running, each accessible via it's own
http port, each
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 20:28:28 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
You shouldn't run into problems doing a direct copy, assuming
you change the four ports mentioned in freenet.ini. You will
simply have multiple instances of freenet running, each
accessible via it's own http port,
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:07:07 +0100, Mark wrote:
You shouldn't run into problems doing a direct copy, assuming you
change the four ports mentioned in freenet.ini. You will simply
have multiple instances of freenet running, each accessible via
it's own http port, each accessing it's own udp
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:10:22 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
Edit the wrapper.java.command=java line
in the wrapper.conf file.
I must be doing something wrong.
I started from scratch by deleting the freenet directory followed by
a tar -xzvf freenet...tar.gz. Then, I changed
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:52:27 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
Does the concept of seednodes apply to Darknets?
No. Seednodes are open/public/known nodes that are used to initially
connect to the opennet. Darknet refers to
dark/private/probably-unknown friends of yours that you explicitly
trust.
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:35:50 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
When I say multiple darknets I mean completely separate but under
an off-band control.
Not possible. Unless you can force your people not to enable opennet,
or not to add other darknet peers who have access to the opennet (or
access
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:04:11 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
Am I [...] correct in understanding that once a member in a darknet
joins opennet then the rest of the members become opennet members?
Correct. Freenet will route through that node (any request that is not
found in the local darknet,
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 06:58:00 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
I am thinking more along the lines of membership interests. I want
to be in the yoga darknet group but also in the tennis darknet
group. But if I join both, I have now bridged these two groups into
a new yoga-tennis group. If I
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:51:15 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
Does this mean that in Darknet mode the peers are not swapped?
Correct. They're fixed. They are your trusted friends.
OK, I can see how the constant swapping may give a malicious member
the opportunity to build a topology of the
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:00:14 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
they can also in theory replace all of your peers,
and thus know what keys you are downloading/uploading.
Isn't the content also encrypted? What good are the keys for to lead
back to the originating node?
The main idea is that
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:58:38 -0400, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
To move in DarkNet you actually have to go and talk to a person...
something like Hi, do you mind introducing me to some of your
friends? which may work only sometimes.
It seems that we are pushing technology to the point that
Why is http://github.com/freenet/fred-official seven hours older (and
a Node version string of #1278 build01278-68-g3f9a3) than
http://github.com/freenet/fred-official/tree/build01280-real ?
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 02:20:03 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1280 is now available, and
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:29:52 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a
browser supporting Javascript. Yes or no answers would be useful
(feel free to make further comments). I will post a similar poll to
FMS. I suggest somebody does Frost,
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:29:52 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a
browser supporting Javascript. Yes or no answers would be useful
(feel free to make further comments). I will post a similar poll to
FMS. I suggest somebody does Frost,
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:45:32 +0200, Romain Dalmaso wrote:
It's a no for me.
I'm not at all against JavaScript, and it's safe to enable it in
incognito mode (or when using a separate Firefox profile for Freenet).
Oh, right, it is also very insecure. I'm not sure what incognito mode
is, and
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:47:21 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Saturday 16 October 2010 11:30:59 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
On Saturday 16 October 2010 10:58:30 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Oh, right, it is also very insecure. I'm not sure what incognito
mode is, and believe
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:43:00 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Friday 15 October 2010 16:54:22 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:29:52 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a
browser supporting Javascript. Yes or no answers
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:49:42 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Saturday 09 October 2010 14:19:16 Freenet Project Inc. wrote:
Customer Feedback for Freenet Project Inc.
freenet.uservoice.com [freenet.uservoice.com] New Bug Report
jamesdu...@yahoo.com sent a message from
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 13:19:16 +, Freenet Project Inc. wrote:
Customer Feedback for Freenet Project Inc.
freenet.uservoice.com [freenet.uservoice.com] New Bug Report
jamesdu...@yahoo.com sent a message from http://freenetproject.org/
[http://freenetproject.org/]
OK NOT A REAL
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:29:52 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a
browser supporting Javascript. Yes or no answers would be useful
(feel free to make further comments). I will post a similar poll to
FMS. I suggest somebody does Frost,
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:45:42 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Friday 15 October 2010 17:07:09 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:29:52 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
We are considering making it impossible to use Freenet without a
browser supporting Javascript. Yes or no answers
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 23:55:18 +0400, Volodya wrote:
On 18.10.2010 23:29, Ray Jones wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:11 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote:
It would be really helpful if people could spend a little time to
understand what is being debated before they start ranting.
Try again. I
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:45:44 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1293 is now available, and will be mandatory on
Monday. This consists of improvements to the block transfer code,
most of which should be invisible - minor optimisations and code
simplifications. Also there are
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:45:44 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1293 is now available, and will be mandatory on
Monday. This consists of improvements to the block transfer code,
most of which should be invisible - minor optimisations and code
simplifications. Also there are
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:09:02 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Friday 22 October 2010 01:13:53 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:45:44 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1293 is now available, and will be mandatory
on Monday. This consists of improvements
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:35:27 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:09:02 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Friday 22 October 2010 01:13:53 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:45:44 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1293 is now available
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:00:30 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:35:27 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:09:02 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Friday 22 October 2010 01:13:53 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:45:44 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:27:01 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:00:30 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:35:27 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:09:02 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Friday 22 October 2010 01:13:53 Dennis Nezic wrote
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:47:58 +0200, Martin Nyhus wrote:
On Saturday 23. October 2010 19:30:18 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:27:01 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
Ok, not so obvious. How can I checkout tag build01295?
You can checkout tags just like branches, so try git checkout
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:03:59 -0500, Daxter wrote:
In particular I'm asking: why not tunnel connections in a manner
similar to VPN?
You can, with darknet ... form your own ssh tunnels with friends, etc.
___
Support mailing list
What's the status of freenet running over icedtea6? It seems to work
fine here, except for a long (2-5min) delay during startup, where cpu
is at 100%, right before the Optimise native queries: true
wrapper.log message. Any ideas what might be causing that?
wrapper.log:
STATUS | wrapper |
I switched my hardware recently, and now Freenet (or something)
is having trouble running. It consumes about 100% CPU, and very
little data goes manages to flow.
I ran an HPROF (cpu=samples,depth=30) on it, and here are the Top
10 culprits:
CPU SAMPLES BEGIN (total = 479392) Tue Nov 2 20:31:28
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:44:19 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 04:14:18 Dennis Nezic wrote:
What's going on with the networking code?
Very normal behaviour. Most threads are waiting in ServerSocket.accept
() which is expected as those threads are waiting
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:37:41 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:44:19 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 04:14:18 Dennis Nezic wrote:
What's going on with the networking code?
Very normal behaviour. Most threads are waiting
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:45:30 +, Guillaume LEROY wrote:
Hello support!
I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID
and correct connection; However, I cannot refresh the boards in FMS
and cannot send messages either. Same thing with Frost. Boards carry
0 messages
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:32:20 +0100, David Balažic wrote:
Hi!
Is there a simpler way to access freesites without freenet SW
installed than described in the second answer here :
http://wiki.freenetproject.org/InFrequentlyAskedQuestions ?
Some kind of public proxy or gateway?
Maybe a Java
Build 1321 doesn't respect my bandwidth limits. (At least not the
inputBandwidthLimit.) It uses all of my network connection's capacity
(thus degrading everything else I do on the Inernet.)
Fix!
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 17:38:29 +0100, Dsoslglece wrote:
Le 07/01/11 17:35, Dennis Nezic a écrit :
Build 1321 doesn't respect my bandwidth limits. (At least not the
inputBandwidthLimit.) It uses all of my network connection's
capacity (thus degrading everything else I do on the Inernet
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:01:34 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
1324 introduced many changes including some bugfixes and some big
changes related to timeouts and telling other peers about the node's
current status. Unfortunately it was buggy, and has been withdrawn.
1325 just includes the
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:39:49 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1326 is now available. This build changes the new
packet format so that it always starts with a predictable message ID
number, which prevents a lot of problems and *may* solve some of the
remaining excessive resend
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:56:54 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:39:49 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1326 is now available. This build changes the
new packet format so that it always starts with a predictable
message ID number, which prevents a lot
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:31:31 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Build 1327 includes three bugfixes which will help to debug 1328,
which hopefully will finally include the new load management
prerequisites (sending the load messages, two-level timeouts). It
will be mandatory on Monday but please
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:49:05 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1329 is now out. It will be mandatory on Monday.
It may be somewhat disruptive, so please report any problems you
find. This build does what 1324 was supposed to do, but with various
bugfixes. Specifically, it lays
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:56:41 +0100, Dsoslglece wrote:
Hi,
I must say that since about a week, The band use seems to be
completely stabilized… I'm still on the version 1327 (the update will
eventually be done some time automatically) and everything seems fine.
Thanks.
iMac-Intel Snow
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:21:37 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:31:31 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Build 1327 includes three bugfixes which will help to debug 1328,
which hopefully will finally include the new load management
prerequisites (sending the load messages, two
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:00:08 +0300, Volodya wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Off topic hand waving, how hard is it, honestly, to have a counter
on each incoming packet, and to only accept inputBandwidthLimit per
second? (And perhaps to add clever debugging messages,
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:06:04 +0300, Volodya wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2011 08:33 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:00:08 +0300, Volodya wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Off topic hand waving, how hard
On 12 Jan 2011, at 12:00pm, support-requ...@freenetproject.org wrote:
For some reason my node has lost the ability to recognise just about
any file type other than images, and constantly drops other types of
downloaded file into a list headed Failed downloads: unknown type
and then the
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:48:56 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334 is now available. It may fix some recent
problems (particularly bwlimitDelayTime problems). Please upgrade!
Same problem as I originally reported a while ago. Input bandwidth
limit is trivially broken. So, like
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:28:24 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011 18:24:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Fix!
Please refrain from bossing us around. You are not in a position to
do that.
Please refrain from mis-interpreting my words. (There is such a thing
as 'c-o-n-t-e-x
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011 20:32:30 Dennis Nezic wrote:
Fix!
Please refrain from bossing us around. You are not in a position
to do that.
Please refrain from mis-interpreting my words. (There is such a
thing as 'c-o-n
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
a “simple thing” like bandwidth limiting
Can someone explain why bandwidth limiting might not be such a simple
thing? Volodya tried, with his massive-incoming-packet theory
(40KiB :p), but that's not true -- freenet packets are about
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:26:56 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
On 22/01/2011, at 7:21 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
a “simple thing” like bandwidth limiting
Can someone explain why bandwidth limiting might not be such a
simple
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:22:13 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
So, the question then becomes, when the node is clearly receiving
more packets than it's supposed to, why is it taking so long (many
minutes
-- I never actually waited to see if the flood, which consumed my
entire connection's
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:18:33 +0300, Volodya wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/2011 10:32 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:22:13 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
So, the question then becomes, when the node is clearly receiving
more packets than
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:06:28 +0300, Volodya wrote:
Please describe the formula through which to calculate the speed of
the data that you need to send to your peer, which has 19 other
peers (and you have no knowledge about the speed with which they
are transmitting).
Simple:
for i
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:55:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:06:28 +0300, Volodya wrote:
Please describe the formula through which to calculate the speed
of the data that you need to send to your peer, which has 19
other peers (and you have no knowledge about the speed
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:51:22 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1335 is now available. Please upgrade, it will be
mandatory on Monday. Changes include many more bugfixes, related to
the message layer, timeouts during path folding on requests
(important for new load management),
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:29:14 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1336 is now available. Please upgrade, it will be
mandatory on Friday. Much of this build is intended to try to improve
network performance and particularly to prevent transfer failures
especially on realtime
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:59:43 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 19:42:38 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:38:55 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2011 22:28:36 you wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:29:14 +, Matthew Toseland wrote
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:55:58 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 20:14:52 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:59:43 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 19:42:38 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:38:55 +, Matthew Toseland
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:49:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:17:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:55:58 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 20:14:52 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:59:43 +, Matthew Toseland
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:44:07 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:01:28 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:49:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:17:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:55:58 +, Matthew Toseland
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:14:14 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
(My last flood occurred for over 10 minutes, and then managed to
stop. I believe all 5 of my connected strangers were listed as
BackedOff during the flood. I will try to provide more details
and more testing.)
Was
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:11:29 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
CC'ing Martin in case he has any ideas.
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:01:28 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:49:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:17:15 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Thu, 27
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:54:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Build 1339 is out. Please upgrade asap, it will be mandatory on
Monday. The main change in this build is that backoff is now separate
for realtime versus bulk requests. This means, hopefully, that if the
performance problems recently
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:25:48 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:54:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Build 1339 is out. Please upgrade asap, it will be mandatory on
Monday. The main change in this build is that backoff is now
separate for realtime versus bulk requests
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:30:09 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Please get the snapshot (update.cmd testing / update.sh testing), and
test it. I want to know if it causes serious problems, and also any
other bugs you run into. I know there will be various errors, but I
am still interested in the
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:01:59 +0100, folkert wrote:
I've got a couple of questions:
1. when creating an e-mail account, it always says it cannot
create the short address. so what is then my freenet e-mail
address?
I believe the long address (and possibly short address) are
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:10:17 +0100, folkert wrote:
I believe the long address (and possibly short address) are
originally stored in the Inbox of Freemail's imap server, if you
manage to connect to it.
Connecting to it is challenging. Evolution refuses it, mutt too.
set
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:34:46 +0100, folkert wrote:
Odd: I always get a password error.
There is a known bug[0] that makes it impossible to login with a
username containing a -, even though accounts can be created
with those names.
Aah ok, that indeed is then the issue.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:01:10 +0100, folkert wrote:
What about that the freenet daemon periodically
(configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to
which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect and
speed up distribution of data.
Data distribution on
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:35:00 +0100, folkert wrote:
Well I was thinking maybe in the future we're all using mesh
networking over wifi (or whatever wireless protocol we then have).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesh_networking
Freenet-Darknet should work wonderfully over such a network :). (Well,
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 21:05:14 +0100, folkert wrote:
which file is the database? can I (securely) delete
it every time and will it then still remember the options set? and is
it possible to select where it stores this messages database?
The sqlite3 (fms.db3) file. It contains all your
101 - 200 of 359 matches
Mail list logo
