Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-29 Thread Fake Name
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens >> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main >> network. There might be now, but the i

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-29 Thread Fake Name
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens >> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main >> network. There might be now, but the i

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-29 Thread Fake Name
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens >> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main >> network. There might be now, but the i

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*

2006-09-06 Thread Fake Name
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Don't feed the troll > I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to Beta state with open-net p.s. please don't top-post > >>Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet >>failures-in-wait

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-28 Thread Fake Name
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke wrote: >On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote: >> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens >> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main >> network. There might be now, but the idea of the way

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-29 Thread Fake Name
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke wrote: >On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote: >> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens >> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main >> network. There might be now, but the idea of the way

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-29 Thread Fake Name
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke wrote: >On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote: >> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens >> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main >> network. There might be now, but the idea of the way

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*

2006-09-03 Thread Fake Name
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, "freenetwork at web.de" wrote: >Don't feed the troll > I am not a troll. 0.7 is in alpha state. It needs to move to Beta state with open-net p.s. please don't top-post > >>Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet >>failures-in-waiting until it pr