Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
Another Browser? - Mozilla - Opera - Netscape cu Sascha ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Difficult to understand all in English
___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] DoS
Hi all, excuse me, but I am not willing to run freenet again, until one has answered my question for my security. This is an urgent question about running it, not how to get it run, so plz answer my question. As the whole thing is lacking of documentation, I do expect my question to be answered. Expect me to deny using freenet if you are not willing to do so! Because freenet needs people using it to be capable to run, every user is worthful and so I need to feel to be noticed with my question at least. Thank you for understanding my position. cheers, Sascha -- GNU Linux | The politician is someone who deals in man's problems of 2.4.19-cr | adjustment. To ask a politician to lead us is to ask the on a | tail of a dog to lead the dog. -- Buckminster Fuller i586 | | | ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] DoS
Hi, thank you so much for answering my questions! I really do feel better now and will continue sharing my computer for freenet, which I am convinced of, is a pretty much good invention! mentioned). Will your load decrease if you shut down Frost for an hour or two? Load immediately decreases, when shutting down frost/freenet. After restarting, my current experience is this: A few minutes like 10 or 30 I have 10 to 20 connections, then it explodes to more than 30. This seems to consumes my load. Sometimes, like the log says, they decrease which I haven't monitored, yet, but do explode again suddenly. If I refuse to start frost, freenet is using cpu time that leads to load about 6 which is accepteable. So frost is the bad guy... As I have old and small harddisks, the amount freenet is capable to use is about 350 MBytes, so I hardly believe that this is the cause for my heavy load, but frost's communication, because there are only 2 up to 8 connections to my freenet port I have monitored ever. Btw, are you running the node properly nice:d? The java is at place one consuming 9x% of cpu time when watched by top. I haven't reniced it, because I think it consumes it's cpu time it needs, so if fiddling with it, I would loose contact, right? Would using a different freenet file system decrease cpu usage leading to less load? ...as the linuxbox should be capable to do other things, I am planning to build another one just for running freenet/frost, which costs more power/money, but increases my security and keeps my first linux-box useable. The linux box has an AMD-3D cpu at 300 MHz and the new box will have a similar one, when finished. Is there a floppy distribution which can do java to run freenet/frost? I'd like to save using a harddisk to run the second linux box, if possible. In the end, I am happy to have joined this mailing list. Thanx again for your fine help. I don't understand, why there is so less docs and, as far as I have noticed at the frost message board, there is lack of developers, too. Why is that? There is really an urgent need of a common and and a more technical FAQ... cheers, Sascha -- GNU Linux | The early bird who catches the worm works for someone who 2.4.19-cr | comes in late and owns the worm farm. -- Travis McGee on a | i586 | | | ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] DoS
Hi all, running freenet for the comunity, is primarily used for frost, here. Frost is currently at a Denial of Service attack and since then, I am watching a lot of more connections to my node than before and downloads have totally stopped, but that might belong to other reasons. plz have a look at the freenet.log.snippet encluded to tell me, if evertything seems just normal and that I can continue running freenet. at the time I have stopped it, because it causes a load from 10 to 18 (!) on my linux machine, which I can't use anymore because of that high load. cu, Sascha Jan 29, 2003 1:04:00 AM (freenet.node.Node, main): Starting interfaces.. Jan 29, 2003 4:06:55 AM (freenet.session.FnpLinkManager, QThread-1129): Too many ongoing negotiations! (31/30) Jan 29, 2003 4:07:07 AM (freenet.session.FnpLinkManager, QThread-1149): Too many ongoing negotiations! (30/30) Jan 29, 2003 4:07:12 AM (freenet.session.FnpLinkManager, QThread-1134): Too many ongoing negotiations! (32/30) Jan 29, 2003 4:47:19 AM (freenet.node.states.request.TransferReply, QThread-1215): Failed to send data with CB 0x83 (CB_RECV_CONN_DIED), on chain 6aa5a52b41de6f93 Jan 29, 2003 4:50:55 AM (freenet.node.states.request.TransferReply, QThread-786): Failed to send data with CB 0x83 (CB_RECV_CONN_DIED), on chain 6479cae25e70e0ad Jan 29, 2003 5:21:26 AM (freenet.node.states.request.TransferReply, QThread-1487): Failed to send data with CB 0x7a (Unknown control byte), on chain 8d704013588c2ae6 Jan 29, 2003 9:26:24 AM (freenet.session.FnpLinkManager, QThread-2723): Too many ongoing negotiations! (32/30) Jan 29, 2003 9:26:26 AM (freenet.session.FnpLinkManager, QThread-2750): Too many ongoing negotiations! (30/30) Jan 29, 2003 9:26:41 AM (freenet.session.FnpLinkManager, QThread-2703): Too many ongoing negotiations! (40/30)
[freenet-support] java error while getting filechunks
Hi, I had a closer look at the frost/keypool/*tmp-chunk* files while download a big file, which was splitted into 100 chunks. I noticed, that chunks in the middle were zero bytes or less than the SplitFile.Blocksize and were not growing anymore, while new chunks were created and grew. I think, that the following error messages belongs to that fact, that some chunks were dead: one of them: ---cut-on--- Jan 17, 2003 5:02:22 PM (freenet.node.ds.FSDataStoreElement$KeyInputStreamImpl, Finalizer): Please close() me manually in finalizer: Key: some_long_key Buffer: freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$ExternalNativeBuffer@3b88f2 New: true ( 0 of 1025 read) java.lang.IllegalStateException: unclosed at freenet.node.ds.FSDataStoreElement$KeyInputStreamImpl.finalize(FSDataStoreElement.java:314) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.invokeFinalizeMethod(Native Method) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.runFinalizer(Finalizer.java:86) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.access$100(Finalizer.java:17) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:163) === StateChain started at Fri Jan 17 16:59:32 CET 2003 Current state: Request Done @ some_short_key ---cut-off--- manually closing and restarting freenet gave the following information: ---cut-on--- Jan 17, 2003 5:08:42 PM (freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore, main): Removing orphaned property 0x0 : some_long_key ---cut-off--- This is truly a bad bug, because if all chunks are downloaded, the file is assumed to be ready to be copied to the download directory, right? Does Java have no bugtracking system to force closing those elements automatically? What would be a workaround, until this bug is not resolved? cu Sascha -- GNU Linux | If I said you had a beautiful body - would you hold it 2.4.19-cr | against me? I am no longer infected! -- John Cleese, on a | Monty Python i586 | | | ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] reducing cpu load on a low end cpu system
Hi, what settings are best to the freenet.conf to reduce cpu load? I have a linuxbox running freenet and frost, which is frustrating, because it slows down everything and freenet's java is consuming 90 - 99 % of cpu time. For example, can I set storeCipherNames=none to reduce calculating keys, or does the cpu has to reencipher them, when they are requested? cu Sascha -- GNU Linux | Not drinking, chasing women, or doing drugs won't make you 2.4.19-cr | live longer -- it just seems that way. on a | i586 | | | ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] reducing cpu load on a low end cpu system
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:48:15PM - or thereabouts, Dave Hooper wrote: I have a linuxbox running freenet and frost, which is frustrating, because it slows down everything and freenet's java is consuming 90 - 99 % of cpu time. Type man nice and see what it says. what do you intend with that? if freenet is consuming so much cpu time, it _needs_ it, right? If I down nice freenet's pid, it will loose connections, which I might need ;) cu Sascha -- GNU Linux | DEJA VU: French., already seen; unoriginal; trite. - 2.4.19-cr | Psychol., The illusion of having previously experienced on a | something actually being encountered for the first time. i586 | | | ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Fixing build 544?
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:03:19AM + or thereabouts, Matthew Toseland wrote: Please could you try now? The file freenet.jar (stable) should be 1,533,021 bytes long with an MD5 of 8a30371333c336e9ead7db4f0093b871 Hi, does the freenet.jar linux fetches at gentoo linux at a fresh (re)start invoked by the startscript /etc/init.d/freenet differ from those you are speaking about? I restarted freenet a few minutes ago, because there was no traffic at the NIC and no connections showed by netstat. It has the same length but the md5sum (v2.1 textutils) differs. ... I assume, minor bugfixes were made ... cu Sascha -- GNU Linux | vi has two modes, the one in which it beeps, and the one 2.4.19-cr | in which it doesn't -- Alan Cox on a | i586 | | | ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] how to close
Watch this: ---schnipp--- Jan 10, 2003 9:50:30 PM (freenet.node.ds.FSDataStoreElement$KeyInputStreamImpl, Finalizer): Please close() me manually in finalizer: Key: some long key Buffer: freenet.fs.dir.NativeFSDirectory$ExternalNativeBuffer@2a55aa New: true ( 0 of 1025 read) java.lang.IllegalStateException: unclosed at freenet.node.ds.FSDataStoreElement$KeyInputStreamImpl.finalize(FSDataStoreElement.java:314) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.invokeFinalizeMethod(Native Method) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.runFinalizer(Finalizer.java:86) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.access$100(Finalizer.java:17) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:163) === StateChain started at Fri Jan 10 21:48:21 CET 2003 Current state: Request Done @ some short key ---schnapp--- how to do what the log wants me to? or what else to do? thanx, Sascha -- GNU Linux | Penguin Trivia #46: Animals who are not penguins can only 2.4.19-cr | wish they were. -- Chicago Reader 10/15/82 on a | i586 | | | ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Still not announcing..
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 10:40:53AM -0800 or thereabouts, Chris Linstruth wrote: [..] By the way, it's REALLY difficult to read your responses without whitespace between your text and the text you're replying to. very hard to read is full quoting, too. To reduce bandwidth and being eye-friendly all of us should shorten the quotings to the relevant things the answer is about, please. Please read http://learn.to/quote for arguments of my stating, thanx. Sascha -- GNU Linux | Guten Tag, ich habe einen Windowscomputer. Ich habe da 2.4.19-cr | ein Problem! - Das sagten Sie schon. on a | i586 | | | ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
