Re: [freenet-support] Re: Permanent node question

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:05:43AM +, Psikic wrote: Nicholas Sturm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is an interesting comment. Could this really be why we are getting little response in last few months? I haven't used freenet for a few months... I just downloaded the latest

Re: [freenet-support] some errors with build 5076

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 07:54:38PM -0400, Nikita Proskourine wrote: Here is some selective filtering of my freenet.log for errors. I am running FreeNet on WinXP with the bundled JRE (installed from scratch). A few minutes after I started my node: Apr 9, 2004 7:03:17 PM

Reminder re sessionv2 was Re: [freenet-support] Recognizable headers in Freenet conversation

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:11:37PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: I fired up Ethereal and let it capture for a few minutes, then looked for a SYN packet. The first 0xc0 bytes of the conversation have what appear to be easily recognizable bytes: 00 01 09 04 00 00, and a string of zeros later.

Re: [freenet-support] The Freenet Experience

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:20:41AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: On Tuesday 27 April 2004 10:53, Toad wrote: I assume you are using the stable branch? What build? Have you upgraded to 5077? And please show me the top few lines from http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Build 5077, problems with routing summary and log rotating

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 06:08:50PM +0200, Rudolf Krist wrote: Toad schrieb: On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:30:29PM +0200, Marc wrote: Hi, when I try to view http://localhost:/servlet/nodestatus/routing.html (the routing summary), I get nothing back. But in freenet.log I find

Re: [freenet-support] NPE in build 5077

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 05:19:11PM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: It is a known issue.. best workaround would probably be to remove the key from the RSL:s maintenance-queue before actually closing it.. The workaround is easier than that. Just take getBuf() returning null to mean the same as

Re: Minor update to script (Re: [freenet-support] log rotation)

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:11:17PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: Just noticed after I had uploaded the log rotate script that the date command was being used in two locations. Stoopid. Uhm, what exactly is this supposed to do? If you are not using logRotate=true in the config file, then the

Re: [freenet-support] NAT Freenet

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 11:05:14PM -0700, Galen wrote: Hi, One of the places where I would like to use freenet is behind NAT. I know all about port mapping, but this simply isn't available in this situation. What is the hope of running Freenet? I know virtually every other protocol

Re: [freenet-support] NAT Freenet

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:07:15PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:41:56 -0700, Galen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella, fasttrack, etc. Uploading doesn't always work really great, but downloading is quite

Re: [freenet-support] NAT Freenet

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:07:49PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote: No, they haven't. Please try running a web server behind a NAT that you can't forward ports on. Or ssh. Or any number of other client/server protocols. I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella,

Re: Minor update to script (Re: [freenet-support] log rotation)

2004-04-28 Thread Toad
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:12:39PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: On 27-Apr-2004 Toad wrote: On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:11:17PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: Just noticed after I had uploaded the log rotate script that the date command was being used in two locations. Stoopid. Uhm

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet crashes DSL modem

2004-05-01 Thread Toad
Usually this is caused by the hardware routers/etc not being able to support enough connections. You could try decreasing maxNodeConnections (the default is now 200, but if you have an old config file it might be forced to 512; you could try 100). On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 08:30:34PM -0700, Galen

[freenet-support] Stable build 5078

2004-05-03 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5078 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. All stable branch users should upgrade ASAP. Changelog: * Make 5077 mandatory. This is a fairly significant change. 5077 made huge changes, including some fundamental changes to how freenet routes (bidirectional

Re: [freenet-support] Which is the best browser to use for security with Freenet

2004-05-15 Thread Toad
Sure. On Windows: Mozilla, Opera (with some configuration, specifically you must set it not to ignore MIME types), Firebird/Firefox, Lynx, Links. On Linux/BSD/etc: Mozilla, Firebird/Firefox, Konqueror (probably; not thoroughly tested), Links, Lynx. On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:41:50AM -0700, mary

[freenet-support] Request for help: Seednodes for stable

2004-05-15 Thread Toad
We need seednode sources for stable urgently. All you need to do is give dodo.freenetproject.org access to mainport: mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,212.13.198.248 in your freenet.conf And send me the address of the node. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official

[freenet-support] Stable build 5082

2004-05-15 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5082 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Please upgrade ASAP. Stable branch users should upgrade at least weekly as Freenet is still at a relatively early phase of development. You can use the update option on the start menu, or freenet-webinstall.exe to update

Freenet project paypal account frozen was Re: [freenet-support] Payment failure

2004-05-17 Thread Toad
The account has apparently been frozen. Feel free to slashdot. (I was rather tempted to CC this to announce, but I don't think it would have been a good idea :) ). We should be able to get the money back (fortunately there wasn't much in the account).. but it may take 6 months... Apparently the

Re: [freenet-support] Re: mailing list subscriber email should bypass spam blockers

2004-05-18 Thread Toad
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Someone wrote: Edward J. Huff schrieb: Nothing goes through my ISP's mail server, but since traffic on port 25 is unencrypted, they can read my mail anyway. As an alternative you could post to and read the lists via the gmane news group server,

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet directory sharing between Linux/windoz

2004-05-18 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:27:41AM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 May 2004 09:40, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote: Also, linux's FAT32 driver doesn't care for case... However, if the Freenet client get a directory listing and do

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet directory sharing between Linux/windoz

2004-05-18 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:04:06PM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 May 2004 15:55, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote: As I said, FAT32 filesystems under Linux are *case-insensitive*...Whenever you type the name in UPPER or lower case,

Re: [freenet-support] Here's the bounce reply (the list WILL block subscribers on DSL addresses running their own MTAs)

2004-05-18 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:16:58PM -0400, Jay Oliveri wrote: Don't wait for someone to implement what you've suggested (allowing direct SMTP connections from a dynamic IP); there's enough work to do without building these kinds of things that just lead to constant maintenance. There's

Re: [freenet-support] mailing list subscriber email should bypass spam blockers

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:21:31AM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: On Tue, 18 May 2004, Toad wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: =20 And to further the mail objection against having to use my ISP's mailer to talk to *this* list

Re: [freenet-support] Snapshots

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 04:13:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems so, as if the snapshots do not get updated anymore. At least the unstable-latest.jar (or similiar, the file which gets downloaded from the update script) is still version 60103, although 60105 was already announced.

Re: [freenet-support] freenet on slashdot

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 08:08:22PM -0700, pineapple wrote: The paypay-freenet incident has landed on slashdot. Wonder how the website will hold up? :) The website isn't a problem, it's hosted on sourceforge. The problem with slashdot is usually that the network gets 10,000 new hosts, of which

Re: [freenet-support] Datastore loses keys on restart

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:54:28AM -0400, Daves Lists wrote: My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the thread limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My datastore is set to 50 gigs and is no where near full. Below are the stats before and after. Were those

Re: [freenet-support] Datastore loses keys on restart

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:13:48AM +0200, TLD wrote: Daves Lists wrote: My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the thread limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My datastore is set to 50 gigs and is no where near full. Below are the stats before and

Re: [freenet-support] error first time start freenet

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:14:36AM -0500, tripolar wrote: I am running Debian-sid, 2.6.3 kernel, and java from sun ( j2re-1_4_2_04 ). I installed freenet, edited the conf file- just added my ip address. When I started freenet $sh start-freenet.sh I get this error ( below) though this part

Re: [freenet-support] Here's the bounce reply (the list WILL block subscribers on DSL addresses running their own MTAs)

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
This shouldn't happen any more - at least, not from SORBS. On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:29:19AM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 18 09:25:34 2004 Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 09:24:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem MAILER-DAEMON To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet directory sharing between Linux/windoz

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
Arguably we should change the index format to not include actual pathnames. On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:07:48AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: Or adding code to handle the situation better even... /N -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [freenet-support] freenet crashing (with less log to get under the 40 K limit)

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:33:50AM -0400, Ed Soniat wrote: I have a freenet configuration which was working great and then it started crashing. Since it was working fine and I haven't changed anything I doubt it is the configuration file. Some times it runs for several minutes, some times

Re: [freenet-support] Here's the bounce reply (the list WILL block subscribers on DSL addresses running their own MTAs)

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:30:59PM -0700, Chris Linstruth wrote: Reversing this should do the trick. SORBS.NET is way too aggressive and often out-of-date with marginal support in gettting erroneous entries removed. Spamhaus hasn't given me any problems at all. Nor has the mail-abuse.org

Re: [freenet-support] Re: freenet on slashdot

2004-05-21 Thread Toad
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 03:44:20PM +0200, Ole Tange wrote: On Wed, 19 May 2004 20:32:08 +0100, Toad wrote: and most of the rest are behind NATs which the user doesn't properly work around. :) Is there any reason why we cannot use STUN to avoid the NAT problems? It ought to be fairly

Re: [freenet-support] Re: freenet on slashdot

2004-05-21 Thread Toad
Umm. I was told that most NATs would use the port number to forward packets from any and all external hosts to the one internal PC that has used a given port.. is that wrong? On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 06:48:42PM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On

Re: [freenet-support] Re: freenet on slashdot

2004-05-21 Thread Toad
In any case, is it fair to say that we will probably need some sort of introduction over the network for anything like this to work? i.e. we will need a way to send a message to a node we are not directly connected to, through the network? On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 07:36:16PM +0100, Toad wrote

Re: [freenet-support] Re: freenet on slashdot

2004-05-21 Thread Toad
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 07:37:25PM +0100, Toad wrote: In any case, is it fair to say that we will probably need some sort of introduction over the network for anything like this to work? i.e. we will need a way to send a message to a node we are not directly connected to, through the network

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet through UDP

2004-05-21 Thread Toad
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 09:36:57PM +0200, Ole Tange wrote: On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:02:39 +0100, dave-kId6I2PxnVtBDgjK7y7TUQ wrote: and most of the rest are behind NATs which the user doesn't properly work around. :) Is there any reason why we cannot use STUN to avoid the NAT problems? It

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet through UDP

2004-05-22 Thread Toad
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 01:39:37AM +0200, Martin Scheffler wrote: On Friday 21 May 2004 22:27, Toad wrote: STUN is used to determine whether you are behind NAT. If you are then you need a third party to start connections to others behind NAT. The third party need not be a single server

Re: [freenet-support] trouble installing it

2004-05-22 Thread Toad
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:27:41PM +, c enrique wrote: hello i just need some help with this issue. When I try to run freenet.sh this is the error message i'm getting : [EMAIL PROTECTED] freenet]$ sh start-freenet.sh Detected freenet-ext.jar Detected freenet.jar Starting Freenet now:

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-24 Thread Toad
at it then, see if I can find where to do the limiting. I knew Java knowledge would come in handy :P So for now my node is offline. I've lowered my rate limiting to 500 bytes/sec to keep things under control, but I'm waiting for my ISPs traffic information to come back online... Toad

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-24 Thread Toad
much traffic it wants, and this will oscillate wildly according to how many domestic versus international nodes are connecting. I'm *hoping* domestic nodes will learn that it is worthwhile connecting to me, but they may be put off by the average they get. I don't know. Someday when Toad

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-24 Thread Toad
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:32:50AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One thing that I can think of is limiting the size of incoming files not requested by the node directly - stop splitfiles and things going through. I'm more interested in the

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-24 Thread Toad
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:42:28PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote: Toad wrote: On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:05:42AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: So I've been working towards a Linux traffic shaper that gives sets no limits on traffic with domestic IP addresses and limits international traffic

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-26 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:34:18AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:04:53AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: Not terribly well, because of high level bandwidth limiting. The node needs to know how much bandwidth is available

Re: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-26 Thread Toad
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:08:25PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: version 0.5.2.8 on win2k server and I install it by just clicking on freenet- webinstall.exe . I am on a Nat so I have modify freenet.ini file with ipAddress=192.168.0.1 and a redirector to this ip with the random freenet

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-26 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:39:34PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote: On Tue, 25 May 2004 10:51:20 -0400, Jay Oliveri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Fred takes too much CPU and RAM because it's written in Java. I hate this depate. It's true that object orienting uses up (a few) more bytes than

Re: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-26 Thread Toad
Go to Advanced mode on the Web Interface. Then tell us exactly what the error message says when you try to get the page(s). On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:26:07AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I try to get http://127.0.0.1:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] but always same error Couldn't retrieve key and

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:15:25AM +0200, Garb wrote: Conrad Sabatier wrote: I find Java's memory requirements to be totally unreasonable, its performance lackluster, and I've finally come to the conclusion that it was indeed a poor choice of language in which to implement a project of

Re: Re[5]: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:49:30PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote: But if I understand, Freenet can't work on a network without fixed IP or dns server ? Freenet can't work with an internal IP and port redirection from the external IP so no way to go throw a firewall ? Lot of constraint for

Re: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 05:53:51AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have re download the seednode after thinking freenet was frozen for 5 minutes because no progress bar working (another bug). What exactly happened? You tried to access a freenet site and it took more than 5 minutes to fetch

Re: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:27:07PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I said above, it is technically possible to run it behind a firewall ok so I have put an automatic update of dns name in my internal Dns server which point to my external IP (externalIP.server.network) and put it in the

Re: Re[5]: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 01:37:24PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote: Below Or use a service such as dyndns.org and put your hostname in your freenet.ini. Freenet has routines to check for IP changes (I've disabled them - static IP), so it should work pretty well once it's established, but

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on NetBSD 1.6 (old java version)

2004-05-28 Thread Toad
A 1.4 JVM is an absolute requirement, because we use NIO. Sorry. Kaffe or GCJ might run on NetBSD, however, right now the NIO doesn't work on that either (bugs, being worked on, but can't give you a schedule). On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:23:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I recently

Re: [freenet-support] freenet on Mac OS X 10.3.3

2004-05-28 Thread Toad
Does it start anyway? On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:12:49AM +, Paul wrote: Hi. I have successfully run freenet on Mac OS X for some time. I have downloaded installed the latest stable, but when I attempt to start freenet, here is the result: iMac:~/freenet paul$ sh ./start-freenet.sh

Re: [freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest

2004-05-28 Thread Toad
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:13:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-29 Thread Toad
Woah. We have MUCH less bandwidth in the UK. :| On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 10:13:04AM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote: On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:39:14 -0400, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's either not that speed, or not DSL! ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little

[freenet-support] Stable build 5083

2004-05-29 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5083 is now available. All stable branch users should upgrade. This build will be made mandatory in the fairly near future, so it is a good idea to upgrade soon. If you don't know which branch you're on you're probably running stable. If on linux, MacOS/X, or other POSIX

Re: [freenet-support] Host access problem

2004-05-31 Thread Toad
Woah. Oh well, what do you expect from the Church of Scientology? On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote: Having found that I was using Mozilla 1.6 for most browsing, I allowed it to become the default browser with EarthLink TotalAccess. Before that I'd had Internet

Re: [freenet-support] Host access problem

2004-05-31 Thread Toad
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 07:52:20PM +0100, Toad wrote: Woah. Oh well, what do you expect from the Church of Scientology? I heard they own Earthlink, that all. If they don't, I apologize for spreading malicious rumours. On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote: Having

Re: [freenet-support] Error messages- java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2004-06-01 Thread Toad
Hmmm. What are you running this on? If unix, what's your ulimit -n ? On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:10:58PM +, tripolar wrote: java.io.IOException: Too many open files at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method) at

Re: [freenet-support] Error messages- java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2004-06-01 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:46:10PM +, tripolar wrote: I am running Debian-sid I am currently trying to find my ulimit -n ?? Any clues? Thanks Just type it at a command line. Toad wrote: Hmmm. What are you running this on? If unix, what's your ulimit -n ? On Tue, Jun 01, 2004

[freenet-support] Request for help: NullPointerException on startup

2004-06-01 Thread Toad
Hi. Some users have been reporting NullPointerException's on startup of their stable nodes. I have a possible fix, but I'd like to test this before merging it to stable. If you have this problem please mail me and I'll send you a jar to test. Include which branch you are running. -- Matthew J

Re: [freenet-support] Permanent node default

2004-06-02 Thread Toad
All nodes, whether transient or not, now accept queries and process them for other nodes. It is unclear whether transient actually means anything, we will probably remove it soon. On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 07:33:16AM +, Cossack wrote: Would it be advantageous to make freenet default to a

[freenet-support] Stable build 5084

2004-06-02 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5084 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP, if you are running a stable branch node (if you're not, you'll know). You can do this by running the update.sh script on POSIX like systems such as Linux or MacOS/X (stop the node first, then update it, then start it), or on

[freenet-support] 5083/5084 errata

2004-06-02 Thread Toad
If you downloaded 5083 or 5084 recently, for a POSIX-like platform such as Linux or MacOS/X, if you downloaded the tgz, rather than upgrading an existing node, or if you built from CVS, you may have got an incorrect update.sh. It accidentally slipped in in 5083 and has now been corrected. It would

Re: [freenet-support] How to set ulimit -Hn 65536 on a Debian machine?

2004-06-03 Thread Toad
/etc/security/limits ? On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 12:15:28AM +, tripolar wrote: I have read Ed's tips below though I am still at a loss as how to add ulimit stuff to /etc/profile and /etc/initscript here is the path to java /usr/lib/j2re1.4-sun/bin/java and the path for freenet is

Re: [freenet-support] data store

2004-06-04 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 06:06:46AM -0500, Robert Greenage wrote: is there a problem if my nodes data store reaches 100% ? No. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

[freenet-support] Sourceforge problems

2004-06-04 Thread Toad
There are some minor technical issues happening: Sourceforge appears to be down: CVS is not working, at least not from my PC. Cannot connect to host. Interestingly, the web site is still up. The seednodes.ref (stable seednodes) file consists of one node: physical.tcp=82.32.16.59:49561 ... End

Re: [freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest

2004-06-08 Thread Toad
Hi! On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:33:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for my late reply I was out of town most of last week. The newest build seems to have fix the problem with it almost always being overloaded, but it still is getting overloaded by this by a lot. It will get

Re: [freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship of Web sites

2004-06-08 Thread Toad
My reply is on tech. That is the more appropriate forum. Or perhaps even chat. On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote: First they came for the child porn sites ... http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1232422,00.html Discussion on

Re: [freenet-support] trouble getting any information

2004-06-08 Thread Toad
How long has the node been up? Go to advanced mode on the web interface. What is the error message now? It will be more detailed. How many incoming connections do you have? Show me the top few lines of the following page: http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html As the warning on

Re: [freenet-support] Bad request URI???

2004-06-08 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:41:57AM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote: Hi, I have just tried to insert a file into the network, running stable build 5084. After the successful insertion, I used the URI: freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to request the file just inserted on the main web interface

Re: [freenet-support] freenet on Mac OS X 10.3.3

2004-06-10 Thread Toad
I can add a special case to make this work. But I need the output of the uname command on OS/X. On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:12:49AM +, Paul wrote: Hi. I have successfully run freenet on Mac OS X for some time. I have downloaded installed the latest stable, but when I attempt to start

Re: [freenet-support] Datastore loses keys on restart

2004-06-10 Thread Toad
Does this still happen? I think it was caused by tempfile leaks which hopefully are fixed now... On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:54:28AM -0400, Daves Lists wrote: My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the thread limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My

Re: [freenet-support] Error - unable to recover from out of memory

2004-06-11 Thread Toad
What build of Freenet? How much memory in the machine? Did you try to reduce the memory limit? Are you running on Windows? If you are running on *nix, please send your start-freenet.sh .. if you are running on Windows, there's an equivalent issue with direct memory settings but I don't know what

Re: [freenet-support] Install failed

2004-06-11 Thread Toad
I can get it easily enough. Would you like me to email you seednodes.ref? I could bzip2 it, if you have bzip2 to decompress it, to save space (it'll still be ~ 2MB...). On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:59:10AM +0200, Mathieu Benoit wrote: Dear all, I'm not able to connect to any freenet servers to

Re: [freenet-support] permanent node Q's

2004-06-11 Thread Toad
How is your node now? What did you set the ipAddress to? It needs to be the external IP address of your router... if it's on a dynamic IP, the best way to do this is with dyndns... On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:24:28PM +, runya sairon wrote: i run my T1 ( win xp ) behind a DI-604

Re: [freenet-support] optimum settings

2004-06-12 Thread Toad
, miguel wrote: Could Toad or Ian or someone out there supply us with some config file settings that will make Freenet run optimally(on most machines) without us having to do experiment after time-consuming experiment until we eventually(or not) discover which settings are best. And please

Re: [freenet-support] connection problems

2004-06-15 Thread Toad
You appear to have set outputBandwidthLimit=250. That is not a good idea! On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 11:15:26AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am having lot of trouble getting anywhere after installation. Can anyone tell me what the problem is from looking at this info? Node Version 0.5

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-15 Thread Toad
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:45:46AM -0500, David Masover wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Madeline Brubaker wrote: | Would someone step me through setting up Norton Internet Security | Professional properly? I'm not entirely sure how to Do yourself a favor, and

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-15 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 12:15:09AM -0400, Michael R. Stork wrote: David Masover wrote: Michael R. Stork wrote: [...] | a hardware firewall and NAT. I wouldn't connect any PC direct to a | cable/DSL line. I would. A linux one. Or better, a BSD one. With daily updates. The firewall

Re: Linux vs Windows was (Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall)

2004-06-15 Thread Toad
Because the solution he offered was actually reasonably practical. For a lot of people anyway. Maybe not trivial but certainly not hard, and probably not expensive. However we are straying dangerously close to advocacy here... On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 12:25:15AM -0400, Michael R. Stork wrote:

Re: [freenet-support] Norton Firewall

2004-06-15 Thread Toad
:) Good point. Personally I've never used Norton even on a Windows machine.. maybe somebody here has. On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 02:08:00AM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote: Now that we have let off the steam, did anyone ever really try to answer this nice person's questions to her satisfaction?

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-15 Thread Toad
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:46:24PM -0500, David Masover wrote: | I had an external firewall only that sat between the cable modem and the | house LAN, but there was a problem; someone else on the LAN got a worm | (they aren't as savvy) and I was running Windows without a firewall, and | with

Re: [freenet-support] Norton Firewall

2004-06-15 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:01:24PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Find the IP address of my NAT or Firewall. The FAQ says to consult my manual but I can't find this information. check http://www.whatismyip.com/ it displays your ip from their POV which is the IP the freenet nodes have

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-15 Thread Toad
I would respond to this, but this is DEFINITELY getting off-topic. Please take distribution/OS advocacy to chat. On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 06:04:59PM -0500, David Masover wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nicholas Sturm wrote: | Dear | |Madeline Brubaker: | | |

Re: [freenet-support] Norton Firewall

2004-06-15 Thread Toad
If you are just using NIS and connecting directly to the DSL modem/cable modem, then you just need to tell NIS to allow incoming connections on the listenPort... you probably don't need to set ipAddress. And if you do, on a dynamic DNS system, it probably would be a bad idea anyway. On Sun, Jun

Re: [freenet-support] How to speed up Java

2004-06-15 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:29:53PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote: Saw this on /. - thought it might interest someone. Especially the part about using the server JVM instead of client JVM when speed is an issue (i.e, if you have plenty of ram but you feel Freenet use too much CPU) My

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-16 Thread Toad
Really people, can we take the advocacy to chat or private email? Oh and btw, the number of nodes on freenet is ~ 4000-16000. On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 07:53:38PM -0400, Michael R. Stork wrote: David Masover wrote: an excuse to tell them how ignorant they are for not doing it your way

Re: [freenet-support] DATA STORE

2004-06-16 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:55:08AM -0700, miguel wrote: Hey there! I have a 6+ gigabyte datastore(yeah, yeah, hold the praise. Thank you, thank you...) My 3 nodes (usually 1-2 of them are running) have DSs of: storeSize=0.9G (second unstable node used for testing) storeSize=19G (stable node)

Re: [freenet-support] DATA STORE

2004-06-16 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:07:02AM -0400, Michael R. Stork wrote: Toad wrote: On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:55:08AM -0700, miguel wrote: What I can't figure is this... When I stop Freenet for whatever reason, and then restart it, it looks to me like it should load some of my previously

Re: [freenet-support] webinterface not available

2004-06-16 Thread Toad
Strange... what Java version are you running it under? On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:09:54PM +0200, Hessi James wrote: hi, i run an up-to-date windows version of freenet. the webinterface however is not reachable, the site does not finish loading. in freenet.log i get many errors like this

Re: [freenet-support] Node not caching keys requested?

2004-06-16 Thread Toad
Is the store full? If not, this is probably a bug... On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:33:53PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote: I've just started running a freenet node again, it's been up for a few hours (and is getting bombarded by incoming connections :P). However, I'm trying to download FUQID

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents

2004-06-16 Thread Toad
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:17:30PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: a) one does not use Fproxy for fetching a file In which case whatever you did use would retry. Not necessarily. Scripts talking FCP via netcat most likely won't... And, I think

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents

2004-06-19 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:17:30PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: b) the failing file is an image. In that case it just disappears and you have to reload

Re: [freenet-support] max connections not chagning

2004-06-19 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 07:29:05PM -0700, ShoeyFighter wrote: I'm using the latest freenet client on win98se (don't say anything ;p) and Java 1.42, and I can't get the maximum connections to work properly. I set my max connections to 75, and my max threads to 200, but when I access my node

Re: [freenet-support] max connections not chagning

2004-06-19 Thread Toad
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:15:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using the latest freenet client on win98se (don't say anything ;p) and Java 1.42, and I can't get the maximum connections to work properly. I set my max connections to 75, and my max threads to 200, but when I access my

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] where is the http:// in freenet where i can download all those trader's software

2004-06-19 Thread Toad
Uh, you want us to tell you where you can get WaReZ from on Freenet, right? That would almost certainly be illegal... and this IS an open list. Personally I try to avoid proprietary software, but that which I *DO* use (games) I pay for... On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:14:48PM +0800, currency

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents

2004-06-21 Thread Toad
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:03:18PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [putting every image into an iframe to work around Freenet's reloading bugs] It works pretty

Re: [freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-24 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:31:41AM +0200, Jano wrote: Latest stable, windows 2000, java 1.4.2: After a restart and seeing that I have these peers: Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 13 (12/1/200) OUCH! Have you reseeded recently? In any case if you leave it running for a day

Re: [freenet-support] Re: RNFs

2004-06-24 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:49:46PM +0200, Someone wrote: Toad schrieb: OUCH! Have you reseeded recently? In any case if you leave it running for a day or so it should accumulate more... a reasonable number is 100+ connections... I found that around 30 connections or normal and 60

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >