[freenet-support] commandline modify config

[anonymous freenet]

hi is there anyway to modify config via the command line? i using windows.
reasons is i want to use task scheduler to change bandwidth limit at certain
times. should i change other things besides bandwidth limit if i limit big
big? is like 5k upload only.

sorry if you is receive this times two, i send before but no see.

also do you is no you got no archive any more here
http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/. you is need to go here
http://archives.freenetproject.org/list/support.en.html. but this page
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support is still tell
you go old page.

thanks to all people.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

[freenet-support] commandline modify config

[anonymous freenet]

hi is there anyway to modify config via the command line? i using windows.
reasons is i want to use task scheduler to change bandwidth limit at certain
times. should i change other things besides bandwidth limit if i limit big
big? is like 5k upload only.

sorry if you is receive this times two, i send before but no see.

also do you is no you got no archive any more here
http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/. you is need to go here
http://archives.freenetproject.org/list/support.en.html. but this page
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support is still tell
you go old page.

thanks to all people.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [Tech] Open-net

[anonymous freenet user]

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke  wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-665665722
>
>
>--Apple-Mail-18-665665722
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>   charset=US-ASCII;
>   delsp=yes;
>   format=flowed
>
>Opennet is a high priority, but there are a few things we must do  
>first (such as sort out our load balancing issues, and decide on  
>exactly how opennet should be implemented).
>
>Ian.

Ok, That's understandable.
Is there any kind of roughly-hoped-for-date for deploying open-net?
I realize you can't nail down a date and say on x/y/z open-net will
activate.
I'm looking for some idea of how long it's expected to take in real-time.

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [Tech] Open-net

[anonymous freenet user]

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-665665722


--Apple-Mail-18-665665722
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
   charset=US-ASCII;
   delsp=yes;
   format=flowed

Opennet is a high priority, but there are a few things we must do  
first (such as sort out our load balancing issues, and decide on  
exactly how opennet should be implemented).

Ian.

Ok, That's understandable.
Is there any kind of roughly-hoped-for-date for deploying open-net?
I realize you can't nail down a date and say on x/y/z open-net will
activate.
I'm looking for some idea of how long it's expected to take in real-time.




___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland  wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>   protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland  wrote:
>> >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>> >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=3Dpgp-sha1;
>> >protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"; boundary=3D"MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
>> >Content-Disposition: inline
>>=20
>> personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more
>> compatible
>
>It's more standards compliant.

Perhaps, but useless to programs that do not understand pgp-mime.  Sadly, I
lack the skills to add this capability to Jack B. Nymble and I am entirely
too stubborn to change software from what has worked for me for years, thus
your msgs are not verifyable to me at all.

>> >
>> >You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to
>> >several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content
>> >reset.
>>=20
>> This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and
>> re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible.
>
>Yes.
>>=20
>> On a related note...
>>=20
>> If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am
>> I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace
>> content back to the node that inserted it?
>
>0.5 has security problems. 0.7 has security problems. Either way you are
>vulnerable primarily to those nodes you are directly connected to. Who
>are far fewer in 0.7, and who you hopefully already know, in 0.7.
>Whereas on 0.5 you may well be connected to the [insert bad guys].
>
>Hence the darknet model is safer - at least, it's safer from a distant
>adversary. It is less safe from the point of view of a personal
>betrayal. And it remains an explicit goal that it be impossible to trace
>the author of an insert, however if you happen to be directly connected
>to them, you have a good chance of busting them with a correlation
>attack or something similar, until we implement premix routing (in 0.8).
>
>Also there are a number of important features which are not implemented
>yet, and a variety of attacks are possible. One of the big ones is that
>we don't have proper encryption yet; connections are encrypted, but not
>authenticated yet, so they can be MITMed or spoofed. That will be fixed
>in the reasonably near future.
>

Thanks for the clarification.  That helps my decision of what to insert
where.

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland  wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>   protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ?
>
>That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly
>not before 1.0.
>
>0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer
>updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g.
>simulations.
>
>Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every
>few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase.

Ok, I should rephrase  

"until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is
activated"



>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
>>=20
>> I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
>> enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
>> activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5
>--=20
>Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
>Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
>ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>Content-Description: Digital signature
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFEy4ygOHFIJVywduQRAk5mAKCKvmAG7uJMyLy5nBFc8LFXH9I8SwCfWHRu
>E4+zIwH4Bzwg9qp34vun8xU=
>=J7A9
>-END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--
>
>___
>Support mailing list
>Support at freenetproject.org
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
>Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
>Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple  wrote:
>
>  Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
>download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
>as the preferred download.
> 
> http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
> 
> Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated
>in favor of 0.5. New users are not sticking around on 0.7 because there
>are few content, finding peers harder with darknet along other problems,
>bugs and continual updates.
>
>Pushing 0.7 onto new users in spite of it lack of maturity is in poor form.
>  P.S. On a related topic of reports & complains about a lack of content
>on Freenet 0.7, I may have an explanation for that. I am in touch with a
>number of major Freenet (0.5) content providers since I run the largest
>media & content index site on Freenet 0.5 (FreeNova). Many users,
>including my self, are staying with 0.5 until 0.7 proves itself.
> 
> Scruple
>  

I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5

[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland  wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>   protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
>Content-Disposition: inline

personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more
compatible

>
>You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to
>several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content
>reset.

This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and
re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible.

On a related note...

If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am
I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace
content back to the node that inserted it?

Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
   protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Disposition: inline

personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more
compatible


You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to
several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content
reset.

This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and
re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible.

On a related note...

If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am
I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace
content back to the node that inserted it?







___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
as the preferred download.
 
 http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
 
 Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated
in favor of 0.5. New users are not sticking around on 0.7 because there
are few content, finding peers harder with darknet along other problems,
bugs and continual updates.

Pushing 0.7 onto new users in spite of it lack of maturity is in poor form.
  P.S. On a related topic of reports  complains about a lack of content
on Freenet 0.7, I may have an explanation for that. I am in touch with a
number of major Freenet (0.5) content providers since I run the largest
media  content index site on Freenet 0.5 (FreeNova). Many users,
including my self, are staying with 0.5 until 0.7 proves itself.
 
 Scruple
  

I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5




___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
   protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Disposition: inline


--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year ?

That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly
not before 1.0.

0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer
updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g.
simulations.

Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every
few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase.

Ok, I should rephrase  

until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is
activated



On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
=20
 I agree.  I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
 enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
 activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5
--=20
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEy4ygOHFIJVywduQRAk5mAKCKvmAG7uJMyLy5nBFc8LFXH9I8SwCfWHRu
E4+zIwH4Bzwg9qp34vun8xU=
=J7A9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

[Anonymous Freenet User]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
   protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8
Content-Disposition: inline


--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
 On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 !!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=3Dpgp-sha1;
 protocol=3Dapplication/pgp-signature; boundary=3DMGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
 Content-Disposition: inline
=20
 personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be old fashioned, but it's more
 compatible

It's more standards compliant.

Perhaps, but useless to programs that do not understand pgp-mime.  Sadly, I
lack the skills to add this capability to Jack B. Nymble and I am entirely
too stubborn to change software from what has worked for me for years, thus
your msgs are not verifyable to me at all.

 
 You have to connect to a **0.7** node. Actually you have to connect to
 several. And yes, the content is different; it's an incompatible content
 reset.
=20
 This means that it's time to download all of your favorite 0.5 content and
 re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible.

Yes.
=20
 On a related note...
=20
 If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am
 I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace
 content back to the node that inserted it?

0.5 has security problems. 0.7 has security problems. Either way you are
vulnerable primarily to those nodes you are directly connected to. Who
are far fewer in 0.7, and who you hopefully already know, in 0.7.
Whereas on 0.5 you may well be connected to the [insert bad guys].

Hence the darknet model is safer - at least, it's safer from a distant
adversary. It is less safe from the point of view of a personal
betrayal. And it remains an explicit goal that it be impossible to trace
the author of an insert, however if you happen to be directly connected
to them, you have a good chance of busting them with a correlation
attack or something similar, until we implement premix routing (in 0.8).

Also there are a number of important features which are not implemented
yet, and a variety of attacks are possible. One of the big ones is that
we don't have proper encryption yet; connections are encrypted, but not
authenticated yet, so they can be MITMed or spoofed. That will be fixed
in the reasonably near future.


Thanks for the clarification.  That helps my decision of what to insert
where.



___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]